|
|
 |
|

21st September 2000, 04:37 AM
|
|
An Early Cover
Registration Date: Jun 1999
Location: Donegal Ireland
|
|
Posts: 278
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 48 Karma: 15 
|
|
Planning of Realization Processes - Setting Quality Objectives - ISO 9001
In planning the processes for realization of the product the organization shall determine the following as appropiate;
A) quality objectives for the product, project or contract.'
____________________________________________
Would i be right in thinking that in a prototype/project environment, as opposed to mass production, it is very difficult to set quality objectives?.
Regards
------------------
Andy B
|

21st September 2000, 09:06 AM
|
|
|
|
Andy,
I wouldn't think so, of course, our prototypes end up getting shipped to our customer anyway.
But our engineering staff wants the material built to their drawings/designs. One quality objective.
Our customers want the designs created to meet their specifications. Another quality objective.
And not only that, but everything is supposed to be at the correct rev level. I know that corrections go out to the floor, from the customer, etc. So you still have quality objectives. The specifics just change from project/design to project/design.
Just my experience.
AJP
|

22nd September 2000, 03:49 AM
|
|
An Early Cover
Registration Date: Jun 1999
Location: Donegal Ireland
|
|
Posts: 278
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 48 Karma: 15 
|
|
|
Thanks for the reply AJPaton.
I sort of took building a product to the specification required and using the materials defined as a standard requirement, not really a quality objective.
Do you have any other thoughts what could be a quality objective in this environment?
Regards
------------------
Andy B
|

22nd September 2000, 07:13 AM
|
 |
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: May 2000
Location: Scotland, UK
|
|
Posts: 66
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 40 Karma: 19 
|
|
Andy
A possible example : Your contract/specification may require delivery in 12 weeks, however your objective is to deliver it in 10 weeks, as this will generate a higher satisfaction for your customer.
In our case we are actively trying to get our customers to tell us relatively what is more important - speed/cost/flexibility/responsiveness. We find this very difficult to embody in a contract, as defined customer requirements, as by there nature they are difficult to make tangible in the way that the dimensional specifications of a prototype would be. However getting the right balance of the above, can be clearly indicated as a Quality objective and if we get a clear steer from our customers, the measurement of performance on this objective should be inexorably linked to customer satisfaction.
Our other quality objectives stem from management policy - e.g. policy is to be more profitable, objective for prototype is to deliver it with 25% less labour.
Hope these thoughts help....
Cheers, Al.
|

23rd September 2000, 06:19 PM
|
|
|
It's been my experience that a large number of problems seem to come from an inability to identify a prototype. In one factory in which I worked, we made twelve trailers as a prototype batch, every one was different. In another company it was declared 'we are not in the business of making prototypes', yet every item was 'custom built'.
I suggest we should 'make our mistakes' on prototypes, not on 'production' items.
|

4th June 2002, 02:47 PM
|
 |
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Aug 2001
Location: Rutherfordton, NC
|
|
Posts: 131
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 36 Karma: 15 
|
|
Quality Plans
Are Quality Plans a requirement of clause 7.1 of ISO 9001:2000?
I have a copy of Advanced Product Quality Planning and Control Plan (APQP) from AIAG, but it is more than I am looking for.
I am trying to get my hands on a copy of ISO 10005 "Guidelines for Quality Plans". Can anyone help?
Best Regards,
Hank Fowler
__________________
Insanity - believing results can be changed without changing the processes that create them.
Last edited by HFowler; 5th June 2002 at 09:38 AM.
|

5th June 2002, 10:15 AM
|
 |
Send Martini's !!!!!!!
Registration Date: Feb 2002
Location: Wine Country, NY
Age: 38
|
|
Posts: 201
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 23 Times in 19 Posts
Karma Power: 42
|
|
Quality Plan
Hey Hank !
7.1 does not require a Quality Plan, but, does only referecne it in NOTE 1----that you may refer your documented planning process as a Quality Plan.
Whatever you wanna call it, a consistent, documetned format used for this process is certainly value added and required---- but you cannot be audited to a "Quality Plan".
P.S.--SORRY ! ISO 10005 must be the ONLY guideline I don't have. Good luck sir !
__________________
Operator Error cannot be the Root Cause. Oh, unless you're a Pilot.
|

5th June 2002, 02:12 PM
|
|
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Dec 2001
Location: W Windsor NJ
Age: 55
|
|
Posts: 58
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 34 Karma: 10 
|
|
ISO 10005 is available for purchase from ANSI...
__________________
bew
"But of the good leader; when his work is done, his aim fulfilled, the people will say 'We did this ourselves'." (Lao-Tsu)
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|