|
|
 |

21st September 2000, 03:33 AM
|
|
An Early Cover
Registration Date: Jun 1999
Location: Donegal Ireland
|
|
Posts: 278
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 48 Karma: 15 
|
|
Stupid Question of the Day - Start at section 4 or section 5?
The new ISO 9000:2000 has 8 main sections. As i understand it the first few sections is just assistance to writing the manual ie Scope and Normative References.
At some point you actually start writing how you satisfy the standard.
Is this correct. If yes where do i start writing up the standard? Before Section 4 the Quality Management System or before section 5 Management Responsibility?
Or am i completely away with the fairíes today.
Regards
------------------
Andy B
|

25th September 2000, 09:04 PM
|
 |
Your Elsmar Cove Host
Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 15,852
Thanks Given to Others: 1,892
Thanked 1,563 Times in 1,016 Posts
Karma Power: 604
|
|
I start with section 4.
|

26th September 2000, 10:45 AM
|
|
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Dec 1998
Location: South Central Massachusetts
|
|
Posts: 788
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 12 Posts
Karma Power: 63 Karma: 151  
|
|
me too....
|

26th September 2000, 03:43 PM
|
|
|
|
I may be wrong but isn't section 4 just the system requirements ? Wouldn't you start your manual on section 5.
|

26th September 2000, 07:39 PM
|
 |
Your Elsmar Cove Host
Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 15,852
Thanks Given to Others: 1,892
Thanked 1,563 Times in 1,016 Posts
Karma Power: 604
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by StvFran:
I may be wrong but isn't section 4 just the system requirements ? Wouldn't you start your manual on section 5.
|
I don't see any harm starting on section 5 -- I just address section 4 so some fool auditor doesn't pull the old "You didn't address section 4..." or something. It's no big deal -- section 4 is just a "We do this..." thingie.
|

27th September 2000, 06:10 AM
|
|
An Early Cover
Registration Date: Jun 1999
Location: Donegal Ireland
|
|
Posts: 278
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 48 Karma: 15 
|
|
|
Maybe the question wasnt so daft.
I will probably accept your advise Marc, but would i be the only person that has a bad feeling in the stomach when writing such a handbook in respect of its value to the organisation.
Regards
------------------
Andy B
|

27th September 2000, 06:44 AM
|
 |
Your Elsmar Cove Host
Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 15,852
Thanks Given to Others: 1,892
Thanked 1,563 Times in 1,016 Posts
Karma Power: 604
|
|
If you are talking about a quality or systems manual and you are saying you fail to see any value in it -- yup - that's the way I see it. At best it's a sales gimmick.
|

27th September 2000, 12:28 PM
|
 |
Inactive Registered Visitor
Registration Date: Mar 1999
Location: FL
Age: 44
|
|
Posts: 73
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 45 Karma: 10 
|
|
I just went through a review session on the ISO9001:2000 FDIS yesterday and according to the instructor Sections 5.5.5, 5.5.6, and 5.5.7 of DIS were moved to Section 4 of FDIS. I guess we have to start with Section 4 after all.
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|