The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 10013 - Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 15th June 2001, 10:45 AM
Russ's Avatar
Russ Russ is offline

Registration Date: Apr 2001
Location: Tipton, IN USA
 
Posts: 222
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 22 Times in 16 Posts
Karma Power: 42
Karma: 172
Russ is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.Russ is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Russ
Lightbulb Accessability of Intranet Quality Manual

I need anyones thoughts on how they make their intranet QM accessable yet safeguard other information on a Supervisors PC. Do you use stand-alone stations just for viewing the QM. I have ours set up so it can be accessed on any networked PC here. Yet the Supervisors don't want just anyone walking up to their PC and accessing things. So I'm looking for other avenues to pursue to make the manual easily accessable, yet protect the PC from other users. What did I get myself into here!
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 15th June 2001, 11:43 AM
goose goose is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Apr 2001
Location: nc
 
Posts: 49
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 35
Karma: 10
goose has less than 100 Karma points so far.
We had similar problem; but it really existed before we started using electronic document document.

There was and is the risk that someone can possible use anyones PC.

What really sold the electronic scheme was they, the users, didn't have to keep their "big honkin" binders up todate.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 15th June 2001, 12:16 PM
energy
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
If your computer "owners" object to someone snooping around in their files, just have them hide the files. This option is available in Windows Explorer-View options. I use it at home to keep the grandchildren away from files that I prefer that they do not access. If they can't see them, they aren't curious. Of course, as with most things, there is a way around it. But the terminals are company property and should not contain information that would embarrass the company. In our particular situation, all user have their own place on the "users" drive that is password protected. Confidential stuff is stored there. Personnally, I would tell the "owners" that the terminals are company property and will be used to access the QM. Get any unauthorized (That's usually the real reason) stuff off the machine or hide it.
Hang tough

energy

[This message has been edited by energy (edited 18 June 2001).]

[This message has been edited by energy (edited 18 June 2001).]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15th June 2001, 12:47 PM
E Wall's Avatar
E Wall E Wall is offline
Just Me!

Registration Date: Jun 2001
Location: Southeast USA
 
Posts: 482
Thanks Given to Others: 67
Thanked 26 Times in 21 Posts
Karma Power: 63
Karma: 977
E Wall is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.E Wall is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.E Wall is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.E Wall is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.E Wall is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.E Wall is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.E Wall is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.E Wall is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.
Yin Yang

Our shop floor is set up with a computer for each department to access the maintenance work order system. Supervisors & all staff have separate computers at their desks.

We're still struggling with the 'big honking binders' until I can get project priority raised; but I am looking at launching via intranet using Microsoft Explorer and Adobe Acrobat Reader (which are standard on all computers and non-license req. for acrobat reader only).

I keep looking to see if anyone comes across with a better way to keep control while allowing access.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17th June 2001, 09:15 PM
James Gutherson's Avatar
James Gutherson James Gutherson is offline
Returning to the Cove

Registration Date: Nov 1998
Location: Orange, NSW, Australia
Age: 41
 
Posts: 155
Thanks Given to Others: 2
Thanked 14 Times in 9 Posts
Karma Power: 51
Karma: 178
James Gutherson is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.James Gutherson is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.
Send a message via MSN to James Gutherson Send a message via Skype™ to James Gutherson
Question

I must admit when I first saw this thread I thought, why do your supervisors want to hide aspects of the QMS from some users? I find it vital that the system is completly open and all information is available to everyone. This not only increases ownership of the system, but helps them do their job better and see that their efforts are making a difference.
But from some of the other responces I see the angle of protecting the system from changes. Is this what is being asked? If so I think by far the best solution is a web based system (HTML), or if printed layout control is necessary, then PDF files are great.

James Gutherson
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 17th June 2001, 10:22 PM
Graeme's Avatar
Graeme Graeme is offline
$ Contributor

Registration Date: Sep 2000
Location: Lilburn, GA, USA
Age: 60
 
Posts: 401
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Karma Power: 63
Karma: 894
Graeme is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Graeme is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Graeme is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Graeme is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Graeme is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Graeme is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Graeme is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Graeme Send a message via MSN to Graeme Send a message via Yahoo to Graeme
Thumbs up


My key assumptions are that (1) you have a functional internal network, (2) the network has at least one file server, and (3) each person who uses the QMS material has access to the network through a single-user or shared PC.

If my assumptions are correct, then the answer is to put the file copies that everyone can access in a shared folder on the server. Everyone on the network except the document control person should have read-only access to that folder, and the document control person should have full access. The network operating system takes care of permissions and other security. That way everyone can use their own computers without bothering the supervisor. It makes document control a lot easier as well, and the web page menu for the documents becomes your "master list".

If you do not have a file server, then I strongly suggest getting one - for several reasons that are oustide the scope of this area. Unitl you get one, then put the PDF files you want people to see in a separate shared folder on the supervisor's PC. The supervisor would have full access, of course, and the access for everyone else should be read-only and only over the network.

I agree with your supervisors that other people should not be able to log on to a superviror's computer and be able to do random walks through all of the business and personnel management stuff they have. In every organization I have ever worked in, snooping around a supervisor's files is something that, when you get caught, you will not get a second chance to try it.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 18th June 2001, 12:57 PM
energy
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Russ,
My problem is that I take what I read verbatum. Your post says that you want to allow the personnel to view the "Quality Manual". I saw no harm in Supervisors allowing someone to access the Quality Manual. But, the topic has spread into the accessing the quality management system and the possibility that unauthorized changes may occur as well as people viewing supervisor's confidential stuff. There are plenty of posts in various topics in the forums that have addressed this ad-nauseoum. You should consider purchasing a stand alone monitor as you mentioned, with read only rights. This is of course if you intend to put other documentation on you intranet system. I still feel that any confidential information be kept in Human Resources and not on a personal PC, Supervisor or not. We are not talking about the CEO's PC, are we?

energy

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 18th June 2001, 10:59 PM
Russ's Avatar
Russ Russ is offline

Registration Date: Apr 2001
Location: Tipton, IN USA
 
Posts: 222
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 22 Times in 16 Posts
Karma Power: 42
Karma: 172
Russ is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.Russ is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Russ
I Say...

energy
The thought of using the stand alone PC's does seem like a good way to go. One thought was to use 5 strategically placed units just for the QM out on the floor. This would let the QM be accessed, and not risk anything on any of the Supervisors PC's. We may go with that or maybe some touchscreen units. Just have to see what the pres. will go for. I have write access reserved for me only, so that is not a problem here. And no, we only have this problem out on the floor with the shared, Supervisor PC's.
Thanks for your input.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 10013 - Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
ISO 9001:2008 and AS9100 combined Quality Manual (Systems Manual) westpa AS9100 Aerospace Standard and Requirements 50 9th August 2009 05:22 AM
What is the best format for an Intranet Quality Manual? Sebastian ISO 10013 - Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 7 14th July 2009 11:25 PM
ISO 17025 Quality Manual - How elaborate does the quality manual have to be? shawnann ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories 5 17th November 2008 05:40 AM
Quality Manual vs. ISO9001:2000 Standard - Quality Manual doesn't address all of 9001 qualityboi ISO 9001 - Quality Management Systems Standard 6 12th October 2005 03:57 PM
Moving to Intranet QM (Quality Manual and Documentation) - Recommendations? Russ ISO 10013 - Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 19 27th April 2005 09:55 AM



The time now is 11:21 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts