|
Elsmar Cove Forum Sidebar
|
|
|
|
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
|
| Monitor New Forum Posts
|
|
Follow Marc & Elsmar
|
|
|
Elsmar Cove Groups
|
|
|
Sponsor Links
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access
|
 |
|
Sponsored Links
|
|
|
|
Courtesy Quick Links
|
 Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:
Howard's International Quality Services
Atul's Symphony Technologies
Marcelo Antunes' SQR Consulting
Bob Doering's Correct SPC - Precision Machining
NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook
IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors
SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers
Quality Digest Portal
IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology
ASQ - American Society for Quality
|
|
 |

18th March 2008, 07:46 PM
|
|
Getting Involved (6 to 9 Posts)
Registration Date: May 2006
|
|
Posts: 8
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 29 Karma: 10 
|
|
Surface Roughness Testing - Comparison of models for measuring Ra, Rmax, Rt, Rz
Hello,
My employer is prepared to spend about $8~10K on a surface roughness tester. Has anyone experience with the SJ-401 by Mitutoyo or the Model 440 (Multiple Parameter Unit) by Precision Devices? Any other recommendations for measuring Ra, Rmax, Rt, Rz?
Our specifications are fairly simple. Ra 1.6, 3.2, Rmax=40; Rmin=25, (microns). Some capability to address porosity, ie. Sk (skewness), would be nice but not absolutely necessary. A skidless model would be preferred.
Unit will get heavy use and should last for many years.
|

8th April 2008, 09:13 AM
|
 |
Super Moderator
Registration Date: Jun 2000
Location: North of Chicago,Illinois, USA
Age: 53
|
|
Posts: 2,171
Thanks Given to Others: 472
Thanked 386 Times in 277 Posts
Karma Power: 280
|
|
|
Re: Surface Roughness Testing - Comparison of models for measuring Ra, Rmax, Rt, Rz
Can anyone help with this question?
__________________
CarolX
Theater is life, film is art, and television is furniture.
|

8th April 2008, 09:24 AM
|
 |
Q. A. Manager
Registration Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sarasota, Florida
|
|
Posts: 478
Thanks Given to Others: 405
Thanked 235 Times in 152 Posts
Karma Power: 75
|
|
|
Re: Surface Roughness Testing - Comparison of models for measuring Ra, Rmax, Rt, Rz
We have the Mitutoyo SJ-201 which is the hand held model (kind of an entry level tester) and have had very good luck with it. It is used in severl areas of the shop and is easy to use. I'm sure the SJ-401 will be as reliable and a lot more versitile. We have been very satisfied with our Mitutoya equipment so far.
Doug
__________________
Doug
W4JDZ
|

8th April 2008, 09:36 AM
|
 |
Not out of the crisis
Registration Date: Apr 2006
Location: Butler, NJ
|
|
Posts: 2,451
Thanks Given to Others: 170
Thanked 632 Times in 458 Posts
Karma Power: 284
|
|
|
Re: Surface Roughness Testing - Comparison of models for measuring Ra, Rmax, Rt, Rz
Hi Schnuer - welcome to the cove!
I use a Pocket Surf portable roughness gauge for measuring machined brass and stainless steel. We only use the Ra scale.
Here is the current model, ours is older: http://www.mahr.com/index.php?NodeID=2410
It's an old gauge, but it's held up to being used by many people, many times a day - all of our operators, set up guys, QC inspectors, and R&D people used it multiple times on a daily basis. We keep it on a stand in the QC office.
If you use it heavily expect to replace the probes fairly frequently as they will see the most abuse. We replace ours every 6 months.
|
|
Thanks to ScottK for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
|
|

8th April 2008, 05:39 PM
|
|
Getting Involved (6 to 9 Posts)
Registration Date: May 2006
|
|
Posts: 8
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 29 Karma: 10 
|
|
|
Re: Surface Roughness Testing - Comparison of models for measuring Ra, Rmax, Rt, Rz
The proposal has gone through to purchase an SJ-401 alright from Mitutoyo. We already own a Crysta Apex CMM from this company so it was an easy decision after all.
Thanks all for the replies.
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Forum Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Discussion Threads
|
| Discussion Thread Title |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post or Poll Vote |
|
Standard to use as a guide in measuring surface "roughness" of aluminum tubing
|
german78 |
ISO 17025 and related Metrology Topics - Measurement Devices, Calibration and Test Laboratories |
1 |
9th February 2011 03:08 PM |
|
Correct Length to Measure Surface Roughness
|
Spacewalker |
Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics |
4 |
7th January 2010 03:08 PM |
|
The difference between Rz and Rz3 Surface Roughness
|
Italian1022 |
Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics |
6 |
27th August 2009 08:05 AM |
|
Surface Roughness - What is difference between Ra, Rmax & Rt
|
reddy |
Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics |
6 |
25th July 2007 11:51 AM |
|
Honda Surface Roughness Callout (ex. 12.5S)
|
ksanders |
Customer and Company Specific Requirements |
5 |
3rd June 2004 09:57 PM |
|
|