The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories > Measurement Uncertainty (MU)


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 19th March 2008, 02:28 AM
Ruebenn Ruebenn is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: May 2007
Location: Malaysia
 
Posts: 40
Thanks Given to Others: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 11
Karma: 10
Ruebenn has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Please Help! RF/Microwave Power Measurement Uncertainty

Dear All,

I have scoured some technical websites for some help on the measurement uncertainty of RF/MICROWAVE power measurements.
I Gather that there are 2 general methods..there is one which is the ANSI method and the other the standard ISO method?
Can i choose the former method to derive my uncertainty for the measurement of RF/MICROWAVE power if i am comfortable with it?
Would i be going against the ISO17025/ISO GUM rules?

Rgds
Ruben
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 28th March 2008, 01:28 AM
Hershal's Avatar
Hershal Hershal is offline
Metrologist-Auditor

Registration Date: Mar 2004
Location: So Cal, California, U.S.
Age: 53
 
Posts: 1,621
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 310 Times in 224 Posts
Karma Power: 186
Karma: 6526
Hershal is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Hershal is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Hershal is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Hershal is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Hershal is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Hershal is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Hershal is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Hershal is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default Re: RF/Microwave Power Measurement Uncertainty

You may be able to use the ANSI method, but still need to consider the various effects because you need to know what your uncertainty contributions are and what they are doing to you.

In particulare, look for mismatch loss, VSWR, Rho and Gamma of both the source and load, and depending on your conduit you may have surface loss to consider. A modern analyzer can help with the calculation of most of that, so you don't have to break out the Smith charts, but you may still have to calculate mismatch loss and VSWR.

Depending on the frequency and power you are working with, additional influences may also come in, but the listed ones will do to begin.

Hope this helps.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 28th March 2008, 03:49 AM
Ruebenn Ruebenn is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: May 2007
Location: Malaysia
 
Posts: 40
Thanks Given to Others: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 11
Karma: 10
Ruebenn has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default Re: RF/Microwave Power Measurement Uncertainty

Dear Sir,

Thanks for the help.
The ANSI method gives me a better approximations at certain power levels but the ISO method does the same at some levels as well.
I am in a fix to use which method so that i can finalize my documents.
Is it a sin to have to methods of calculation uncertainties over at different levels as per the ISO 17025 requirements?
Anyways, calculation wise - i think both is not a bother as i think have already covered more parameters in the budget( i am thinking to drop some parameters(budget)to come up with a better BMC) BUT I AM JUST WORRIED SO AS TO COMPLY TO THE ISO 17025 requirements, thats all.
Anyways, thanks for the help.
Appreciate the help.

Rgds
Ruben
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 3rd May 2008, 01:17 AM
Ruebenn Ruebenn is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: May 2007
Location: Malaysia
 
Posts: 40
Thanks Given to Others: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 11
Karma: 10
Ruebenn has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default Re: RF/Microwave Power Measurement Uncertainty

Dear Sir,

Can you tell me what is the SI unit of amplitude modulation?
Also the frequency and phase modulation as well?
I wish to know how to put them in the S.I units?
I know all the units are in Hz..hertz over Hertz cancels off leaving a relative value, true?

For the calculation of amplitude,phase and freq modulation using the 8902S system,
it is stated as 3% + 1 digit (what is the digit here- is it the noise floor,resolution or what?)

Appreciate the help.
Also when i state my bmc for the tuned rf level for a certain range..
say for an example my bmc for a tuned rf level measurement from the range 0dB to 10 dB is 0.03 dB,
what does this mean?
Does it mean 0.03dB of the range or the reading?

Rgds
Ruben
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories > Measurement Uncertainty (MU)

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
TUR (test uncertainty ratio) based on Standard or Expanded Measurement Uncertainty? ScottBP Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 2 25th March 2009 11:04 AM
What is Measurement System Uncertainty (MU)? ashram Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 6 14th February 2009 09:55 PM
Measurement Uncertainty & Tolerance - Adding Uncertainty to the Tolerance Charles Wathen ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories 12 5th June 2008 08:16 AM
Please help me with Measurement Uncertainty (MU) Calculations? amanbhai Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 11 23rd April 2007 05:53 PM
Measurement Uncertainty - Measurement Uncertainty in Measurement Results Marc Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations 0 17th April 2006 08:13 AM



The time now is 01:15 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts