The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories > Measurement Uncertainty (MU)


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 7th April 2008, 09:50 AM
pagnonig's Avatar
pagnonig pagnonig is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: Aug 2007
Location: Italy
Age: 37
 
Posts: 67
Thanks Given to Others: 52
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Karma Power: 11
Karma: 30
pagnonig has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Question Measurement Uncertainty (MU), Accuracy, Precision - Relationship?

Hi All,

I'm a bit confused about how Measurement Uncertainty relates to Measurement Accuracy and Precision.

Could anybody help me (examples will be much appreciated!).

Thank you.
Giuseppe
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 7th April 2008, 11:56 AM
Benjamin28 Benjamin28 is offline
Tater Salad

Registration Date: Dec 2006
Location: CT
 
Posts: 379
Thanks Given to Others: 89
Thanked 149 Times in 107 Posts
Karma Power: 37
Karma: 922
Benjamin28 is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Benjamin28 is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Benjamin28 is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Benjamin28 is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Benjamin28 is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Benjamin28 is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Benjamin28 is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Benjamin28 is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.
Default Re: Measurement Uncertainty (MU), Accuracy, Precision - Relationship?

Accuracy is the closeness of a measured value to it's true value.

Precision is the repeatability of those measurements.

Uncertainty is a scientific quantification of the amount of error in a measurement when you take into account the many different variables which can effect it.

You can not truly know the accuracy of a measurement without knowing the Measurement uncertainty and you can not calculate the measurement uncertainty until you know the precision and much more.
__________________
"Don't Tell Me the Sky is the Limit . . . . . . There Are Footprints on the Moon".
Reply With Quote
Thanks to Benjamin28 for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 8th April 2008, 06:30 AM
pagnonig's Avatar
pagnonig pagnonig is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: Aug 2007
Location: Italy
Age: 37
 
Posts: 67
Thanks Given to Others: 52
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Karma Power: 11
Karma: 30
pagnonig has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default Re: Measurement Uncertainty (MU), Accuracy, Precision - Relationship?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benjamin28 View Post

Accuracy is the closeness of a measured value to it's true value.

Precision is the repeatability of those measurements.

Uncertainty is a scientific quantification of the amount of error in a measurement when you take into account the many different variables which can effect it.

You can not truly know the accuracy of a measurement without knowing the Measurement uncertainty and you can not calculate the measurement uncertainty until you know the precision and much more.
Dear Benjamin,

thank you for the info.
Could you please suggest/post any document which explains, in simple terms, the concepts you summarized.

Giuseppe
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 8th April 2008, 09:33 AM
Umang Vidyarthi Umang Vidyarthi is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: Mar 2007
Location: Gurgaon / India
Age: 63
 
Posts: 503
Thanks Given to Others: 189
Thanked 176 Times in 122 Posts
Karma Power: 44
Karma: 1186
Umang Vidyarthi is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.Umang Vidyarthi is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.Umang Vidyarthi is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.Umang Vidyarthi is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.Umang Vidyarthi is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.Umang Vidyarthi is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.Umang Vidyarthi is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.Umang Vidyarthi is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.Umang Vidyarthi is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.
Yin Yang Re: Measurement Uncertainty (MU), Accuracy, Precision - Relationship?

Quote:
Originally Posted by pagnonig View Post

Dear Benjamin,

thank you for the info.
Could you please suggest/post any document which explains, in simple terms, the concepts you summarized.

Giuseppe
Hello Pagnonig,

Benjamin has provided good answers here. I surmise from your post, that you perhaps are not well versed on the subject. I suggest you go through the MSA manual published by AIAG. Rummaging through the section E & F of chapter 1 will provide you with more clarity.

You may also benefit from the SPC newsletter, I am providing link for four very good articles :

http://www.spcforexcel.com/ezine/sept2007/sept_2007.htm

http://www.spcforexcel.com/ezine/oct2007/oct_2007.htm

http://www.spcforexcel.com/ezine/nov2007/nov_2007.htm

http://www.spcforexcel.com/ezine/dec2007/dec_2007.htm

Besides, you just google and find plenty of sites offering articles,books,and training. Here are some :

http://www.statgraphics.com/measurem...s_analysis.htm

http://www.minitab.com.mx/training/T...entSystems.pdf

http://www.qualitytrainingportal.com.../msa/index.htm

http://ezinearticles.com/?Measuremen...MSA)&id=801704

Hope this helps

Umang
__________________
Quality has to be caused, not controlled.-Philip Crossby
Success comes in cans, failure in can'ts
Reply With Quote
Thanks to Umang Vidyarthi for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  #5  
Old 8th April 2008, 09:47 AM
Benjamin28 Benjamin28 is offline
Tater Salad

Registration Date: Dec 2006
Location: CT
 
Posts: 379
Thanks Given to Others: 89
Thanked 149 Times in 107 Posts
Karma Power: 37
Karma: 922
Benjamin28 is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Benjamin28 is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Benjamin28 is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Benjamin28 is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Benjamin28 is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Benjamin28 is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Benjamin28 is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Benjamin28 is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.
Default Re: Measurement Uncertainty (MU), Accuracy, Precision - Relationship?

Giuseppe I don't really have such a document at hand myself. I would think that a physics teacher or a good beginner's book in metrology would be a good source for basic definitions and learning examples.

For examples of each concept I would use something along these lines.

Accuracy: Brad measures the outside diameter of a washer to be 0.20 inches, the true value of the OD is 0.20 inches and therefore his measurement is accurate. (so accuracy is described as a comparison of a measured value to it's true value)[it should be noted that the true value of a measurement can be infinitely small and therefore can never truly be known]

Precision: Brad uses a different instrument to measure the OD of the same washer and it reads 0.22" so he measures 10 more times and gets the same reading all ten times....it would be said that the instrument is very precise but not accurate.

Uncertainty: Brad uses his superior metrology skills to assess the uncertainty of measurements in his caliper as +/- 0.0005". In this way Brad can safely say that measurements made by this instrument utilizing a sound measurement method in a controlled setting will be within that interval 98% of the time.


These are pretty simplified examples, and as I said I'm sure you could find better ones from a physics teacher or a physics book but I hope this is of some help to you.
__________________
"Don't Tell Me the Sky is the Limit . . . . . . There Are Footprints on the Moon".
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 8th April 2008, 09:50 AM
pagnonig's Avatar
pagnonig pagnonig is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: Aug 2007
Location: Italy
Age: 37
 
Posts: 67
Thanks Given to Others: 52
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Karma Power: 11
Karma: 30
pagnonig has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default Re: Measurement Uncertainty (MU), Accuracy, Precision - Relationship?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benjamin28 View Post

Giuseppe I don't really have such a document at hand myself. I would think that a physics teacher or a good beginner's book in metrology would be a good source for basic definitions and learning examples.

For examples of each concept I would use something along these lines.

Accuracy: Brad measures the outside diameter of a washer to be 0.20 inches, the true value of the OD is 0.20 inches and therefore his measurement is accurate. (so accuracy is described as a comparison of a measured value to it's true value)[it should be noted that the true value of a measurement can be infinitely small and therefore can never truly be known]

Precision: Brad uses a different instrument to measure the OD of the same washer and it reads 0.22" so he measures 10 more times and gets the same reading all ten times....it would be said that the instrument is very precise but not accurate.

Uncertainty: Brad uses his superior metrology skills to assess the uncertainty of measurements in his caliper as +/- 0.0005". In this way Brad can safely say that measurements made by this instrument utilizing a sound measurement method in a controlled setting will be within that interval 98% of the time.


These are pretty simplified examples, and as I said I'm sure you could find better ones from a physics teacher or a physics book but I hope this is of some help to you.

Thank you very much to both of you for your valuable help!
Giuseppe
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 9th April 2008, 04:40 AM
Umang Vidyarthi Umang Vidyarthi is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: Mar 2007
Location: Gurgaon / India
Age: 63
 
Posts: 503
Thanks Given to Others: 189
Thanked 176 Times in 122 Posts
Karma Power: 44
Karma: 1186
Umang Vidyarthi is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.Umang Vidyarthi is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.Umang Vidyarthi is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.Umang Vidyarthi is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.Umang Vidyarthi is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.Umang Vidyarthi is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.Umang Vidyarthi is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.Umang Vidyarthi is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.Umang Vidyarthi is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.
Yin Yang Re: Measurement Uncertainty (MU), Accuracy, Precision - Relationship?

Quote:
Originally Posted by pagnonig View Post

Thank you very much to both of you for your valuable help!
Giuseppe
You are welcome. There is more material on the cove. Click on the forum discussion thread index (located on left hand top in third row, highlighted in blue). In the index, click on 'Measurement Uncertainty (MU)', to open the pandora box.

There is another valuable thread you may benefit from- 'Accuracy vs Precision-what is more important for process capability'.

Here : http://elsmar.com/Forums/showthread.php?t=22349

Umang
__________________
Quality has to be caused, not controlled.-Philip Crossby
Success comes in cans, failure in can'ts
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories > Measurement Uncertainty (MU)

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Precision and Accuracy - Definitions venkatesan Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations 9 12th February 2009 03:30 PM
Accuracy vs. Precision - What is more important for process capability? Statistical Steven SPC Monitoring and Statistical Analysis Techniques 50 10th July 2007 08:23 AM
Relationship between ANOVA and measurement accuracy - Mechanical strenth of a closure davis007 SPC Monitoring and Statistical Analysis Techniques 13 12th June 2006 02:46 PM
CFR Title 21 820.72.b accuracy and precision jrcook5 Medical Devices (21 CFR part 820) 4 17th October 2005 03:28 PM
Dimensional Requirement: Precision vs. Accuracy of its Measurement Paul A. Pelletier ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories 2 31st July 2000 07:07 PM



The time now is 02:10 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts