|
|
 |
|

16th July 2001, 04:14 AM
|
|
|
7.6 control of monitoring and measuring devices in the service industry
is "7.6 Control of Monitoring and Measuring Devices" not applicable in service industry where "instrument" or "equipment" (e.g. caliper, weighing scale) per se is not in use?
what device are they talking about here? can a form, say for example used for measuring customer satisfaction, be considered a device?
thank you very much and hope to hear from you guys.
|

16th July 2001, 12:44 PM
|
 |
Inactive Registered Visitor
Registration Date: Aug 2000
Location: Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA
|
|
Posts: 229
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Karma Power: 42 Karma: 20 
|
|
|
romelnar
It might help in answering your question if we knew what the industry and service your organization performs.
Rick
|

16th July 2001, 09:52 PM
|
|
|
we are in in a PROPERTY MANAGEMENT industry. we manage people, building etc. we don't use any "devices", "equipment" or "instrument" to measure anything.
|

16th July 2001, 10:09 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by romelnar:
we are in in a PROPERTY MANAGEMENT industry. we manage people, building etc. we don't use any "devices", "equipment" or "instrument" to measure anything.
|
Maybe an additional question.
Have your customers requested registration or compliance to ISO?
I'm at somewhat of a loss as to why you would seek ISO and not sure if measurement and test equipment could be waived.
Anybody in the service industry that can help?
ASD...
|

16th July 2001, 10:33 PM
|
 |
Your Elsmar Cove Host
Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Karma Power: 605
|
|
For all intents and purposes M&TE doesn't apply. I did a service business to the 2000 version and that's what it comes down to. That does NOT mean you do not measure things. You provide a service, however you just have to look at the quality policy requirement to know that (this is just 1 example) you have to have goals which implies measurables. If you don't have measureables, you have no way of knowing if you are meeting your goals.
In short, you *probably* (there is a very remote possibility that you could have some type of measurement software - such as a computer program which tracks something - like Time-On-Line in a telephone response operation) are exempt from 7.6.
A form is controlled by your document control system and then, after it is completed, by your records control system.
Yes - I believe ISO 9001 is the correct standard.
[This message has been edited by Marc Smith (edited 16 July 2001).]
|

16th July 2001, 11:28 PM
|
|
|
ok guys consider this and tell me if this valid:
monitoring and measuring devices measure the parameters of a particular product (e.g. width of a wire is measured by a caliper, thermohygrograph measures temperature and relative humidity). in service industry, their product is the "service" they are providing (see "3 terms and definition" of iso9001: 2000). what are the important and critical parameters that they measure? example is " speed of response", "manner of their response", etc. say for example that these parameters are measured using a "customer satisfaction survey" form. will this form they are using be considered as monitoring and measuring device? i think the answer is "yes". then how do they verify this form? one way is to revise it in a periodic basis depending on the current environment. what is the intent? "to guarantee an accurate response". since you want them to respond in a manner that is value-adding to you, you want to guarantee yourself an accurate and true answer. by revising either the physical form or its content periodically, one can avoid a boredom in answering the survey.
i think this is what is in ISO9004-2: 1991 which was now integrated in ISO9001: 2000. remember that this new version is intended genirically and should be interpreted as how it can be adopted on any organization such as service.
[This message has been edited by romelnar (edited 16 July 2001).]
|

17th July 2001, 12:53 AM
|
 |
Your Elsmar Cove Host
Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Karma Power: 605
|
|
-> what are the important and critical parameters that they
-> measure?
What these parameters are depends entirely upon what the company does - and what it determines to be 'important measureables'.
-> will this form they are using be considered as monitoring
-> and measuring device?
While one could argue that a form is a 'device', and one could probably go so far as to even say the form could be 'calibrated', I really don't think 7.6 is meant to address forms. Can you imagine trying to 'calibrate' a Customer Survey' (as an example).
The largest part of it to me is I do not believe the intent is to define a form as a 'device'. During the service company registration that I was involved in it was clear they were not looking at forms as M&TE. The standard talks about "...measuring equipment..." which doesn't equate very well to a form.
One last thing - if you have a form, what standard are you going to 'calibrate' it against? You cannot 'calibrate' something unless you have a standard to compare it to. ISO 9001:2000, section 7.6 line item "a" requires traceability.
-> one way is to revise it in a periodic basis depending on
-> the current environment.
Nope - that's not a 'standard'.
Please give an example of a form which you believe to be a good example of a 'measuring device' or 'measurement equipment' and what standard (with traceability) you would 'calibrate' it against.
|

18th July 2001, 02:45 PM
|
|
|
|
I am also in the service industry (courier)and have wrestled with one aspect of our process. At our location we "cube" boxes using automated equipment. For those not familiar with this process a dimensioner takes measurements from the box and assignes it to the PIN(Package ID Number). We do this not as an essential part of our process but as a process required for appropriate compensation for the size of freight we carry (billing which is not in our scope).
This process does not provide evidence of conformity to product requirements. In this case does this equipment fall under this clause?
Thx
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|