The Elsmar Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to ProblemsElsmar Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Nonconformance and Corrective Action
Forum Username

Wooden Line

Receiving Discrepancy Report vs Nonconformance Report


Search the Elsmar Cove
Search Elsmar
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Follow Marc & Elsmar
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed  Marc Smith's Google+ Page  Marc Smith's Linked In Page   Marc Smith's Elsmar Cove YouTube Page  Marc Smith's Facebook Page  Elsmar Cove Twitter Feed
Elsmar Cove Groups
Elsmar Cove Google+ Group  Elsmar Cove LinkedIn Group  Elsmar Cove Facebook Group
Sponsor Links


Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:

Howard's
International Quality Services
Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting
Bob Doering's
Correct SPC - Precision Machining

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook
IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors
SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers
Quality Digest Portal
IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology
ASQ - American Society for Quality
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 18th April 2008, 04:57 PM
goodnede

 
 
Total Posts: 44
Receiving Discrepancy Report vs Nonconformance Report

I have made a couple of posts (replies) and happy to see replies back to what I had to say. Anyway, I have a question that I would like to have an outsider opinion or two on. It is rather simple question actually.

If the receiving material handler finds an error in paperwork, quantity or packaging should this be written as a "receiving discrepancy report" to be handled by the buyer or as a nonconformance report to be handled by Quality? I know my take on it, I just want to see if anyone agrees with me.

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 18th April 2008, 05:02 PM
Stijloor's Avatar
Stijloor

 
 
Total Posts: 14,919
Re: receiving discrepancy report vs nonconformance report

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by goodnede View Post

I have made a couple of posts (replies) and happy to see replies back to what I had to say. Anyway, I have a question that I would like to have an outsider opinion or two on. It is rather simple question actually.

If the receiving material handler finds an error in paperwork, quantity or packaging should this be written as a "receiving discrepancy report" to be handled by the buyer or as a nonconformance report to be handled by Quality? I know my take on it, I just want to see if anyone agrees with me.
The person(s) that own this purchasing/receiving process should take corrective action. I don't think that's "quality's" job.

Stijloor.
Sponsored Links

  Post Number #3  
Old 18th April 2008, 05:16 PM
Coury Ferguson's Avatar
Coury Ferguson

 
 
Total Posts: 4,316
Re: receiving discrepancy report vs nonconformance report

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Stijloor View Post

The person(s) that own this purchasing/receiving process should take corrective action. I don't think that's "quality's" job.

Stijloor.
I agree. The process owner needs to take the appropriate action.

What does the documented System say who is the process owner/responsible party? That would fall under nonconforming material/process.
  Post Number #4  
Old 18th April 2008, 05:20 PM
Wes Bucey's Avatar
Wes Bucey

 
 
Total Posts: 11,010
Re: receiving discrepancy report vs nonconformance report

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by goodnede View Post

I have made a couple of posts (replies) and happy to see replies back to what I had to say. Anyway, I have a question that I would like to have an outsider opinion or two on. It is rather simple question actually.

If the receiving material handler finds an error in paperwork, quantity or packaging should this be written as a "receiving discrepancy report" to be handled by the buyer or as a nonconformance report to be handled by Quality? I know my take on it, I just want to see if anyone agrees with me.
Why not tell us YOUR opinion? Do you fear skewing the results? I'm pretty sure the Cove crowd is not so easily swayed.

The entity which discovers/detects the nonconformance is responsible for creating the NC. How it gets handled (internally, top officer to top officer, formal request for root cause and corrective action, etc.) ultimately depends on the particular nonconformance, the relationship between levels of the supply chain, and suspicion of root cause.

If the nonconforming paperwork, quantity, or packaging is causing a disruption in the production cycle, I think it belongs in Quality purview for issuing and receiving NC, but certainly, purchasing should be in the loop, especially if they can resolve the entire matter with a quick phone call, rather than a protracted round of "he said, she said" which NC exchanges have been known to generate.

If the count is off because a package got left on a truck is a different issue than if the count is off because each package is labeled with a different count than the actual count. Similarly, labeling which has smudged bar codes is a different issue than packaging with no bar codes when they should be present. If the inspection sheet was inadvertently left on the shipping clerk's desk instead of inserted in package #1 of 10, or inserted in package #2 of 10, is certainly a different issue than if no inspection sheet was ever generated.

Why involve purchasing as an intermediary instead of "an also notified party?" Personally, I prefer ALL records related to quality (product, service, shipping, packaging, etc.) kept in one place with the product or supplier master file so ALL pertinent information is available in one place when evaluating product or supplier for future or continuing business.
  Post Number #5  
Old 18th April 2008, 05:21 PM
Coury Ferguson's Avatar
Coury Ferguson

 
 
Total Posts: 4,316
Re: Receiving Discrepancy Report vs Nonconformance Report

I have moved this post to this forum. You should get some other responses. Maybe not today (since it is Friday and most people are off/ready to get off work or going home), but just hang in there.
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Nonconformance and Corrective Action

Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?


Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Incident Report or Nonconformance Report for Equipment Failure? element79 Quality Management Related Issues 5 5th November 2014 12:24 PM
Is an 8D Report and a NCR (Nonconformance Report) the same? S.DAMODARAN Nonconformance and Corrective Action 2 17th May 2012 10:40 AM
NCR (Nonconformance Report) Combined with Corrective Action Report? nadrojh Nonconformance and Corrective Action 1 22nd April 2012 10:12 PM
Format for Discrepant Material Report (DMR) - Nonconformance Report (NCR) biju-joseph Documentation Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 1 5th March 2012 11:42 PM
(DDR) Delivery Discrepancy Report received from customer for late delivery Cordon - 2007 Nonconformance and Corrective Action 3 20th July 2006 10:03 AM



The time now is 01:36 PM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


 


Marc Timothy Smith - Elsmar.com
8466 LeSourdsville-West Chester Road, Olde West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929
513 341-6272
NOTE: This forum uses "cookies".