The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Nonconformance and Corrective Action
Forum Username


Search the Elsmar Cove
Custom Search
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Follow Marc & Elsmar
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed  Marc Smith's Google+ Page  Marc Smith's Linked In Page   Marc Smith's Elsmar Cove YouTube Page  Marc Smith's Facebook Page  Elsmar Cove Twitter Feed
Elsmar Cove Groups
Elsmar Cove Google+ Group  Elsmar Cove LinkedIn Group  Elsmar Cove Facebook Group
Sponsor Links





Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access

Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:

Howard's
International Quality Services
Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting
Bob Doering's
Correct SPC - Precision Machining

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook
IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors
SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers
Quality Digest Portal
IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology
ASQ - American Society for Quality
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 18th April 2008, 04:57 PM
goodnede goodnede is offline
Involved in Discussions

 
Registration Date: Oct 2006
Location: huntsville, AL
 
Posts: 44
Thanks Given to Others: 38
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Karma Power: 36
Karma: 30
goodnede has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Receiving Discrepancy Report vs Nonconformance Report

I have made a couple of posts (replies) and happy to see replies back to what I had to say. Anyway, I have a question that I would like to have an outsider opinion or two on. It is rather simple question actually.

If the receiving material handler finds an error in paperwork, quantity or packaging should this be written as a "receiving discrepancy report" to be handled by the buyer or as a nonconformance report to be handled by Quality? I know my take on it, I just want to see if anyone agrees with me.

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 18th April 2008, 05:02 PM
Stijloor's Avatar
Stijloor Stijloor is offline
Super Moderator

 
Registration Date: May 2003
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina.
 
Posts: 14,526
Thanks Given to Others: 3,192
Thanked 4,527 Times in 3,207 Posts
Karma Power: 1548
Karma: 25248
Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Re: receiving discrepancy report vs nonconformance report

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by goodnede View Post

I have made a couple of posts (replies) and happy to see replies back to what I had to say. Anyway, I have a question that I would like to have an outsider opinion or two on. It is rather simple question actually.

If the receiving material handler finds an error in paperwork, quantity or packaging should this be written as a "receiving discrepancy report" to be handled by the buyer or as a nonconformance report to be handled by Quality? I know my take on it, I just want to see if anyone agrees with me.
The person(s) that own this purchasing/receiving process should take corrective action. I don't think that's "quality's" job.

Stijloor.
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 18th April 2008, 05:16 PM
Coury Ferguson's Avatar
Coury Ferguson Coury Ferguson is offline
Moderator here to help

 
Registration Date: Jan 2006
Location: SoCal
Age: 56
 
Posts: 4,320
Thanks Given to Others: 941
Thanked 622 Times in 511 Posts
Karma Power: 479
Karma: 5830
Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Re: receiving discrepancy report vs nonconformance report

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Stijloor View Post

The person(s) that own this purchasing/receiving process should take corrective action. I don't think that's "quality's" job.

Stijloor.
I agree. The process owner needs to take the appropriate action.

What does the documented System say who is the process owner/responsible party? That would fall under nonconforming material/process.

__________________

"The one thing I want to leave my children is an honorable name." "It is hard to fail, but it is worse never to have tried to succeed." Theodore Roosevelt Chicago, IL, April 10, 1899
  #4  
Old 18th April 2008, 05:20 PM
Wes Bucey's Avatar
Wes Bucey Wes Bucey is offline
Quality Manager

 
Registration Date: Sep 2003
Location: Illinois
 
Posts: 10,919
Thanks Given to Others: 517
Thanked 3,016 Times in 1,944 Posts
Karma Power: 1179
Karma: 21556
Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Wes Bucey is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Re: receiving discrepancy report vs nonconformance report

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by goodnede View Post

I have made a couple of posts (replies) and happy to see replies back to what I had to say. Anyway, I have a question that I would like to have an outsider opinion or two on. It is rather simple question actually.

If the receiving material handler finds an error in paperwork, quantity or packaging should this be written as a "receiving discrepancy report" to be handled by the buyer or as a nonconformance report to be handled by Quality? I know my take on it, I just want to see if anyone agrees with me.
Why not tell us YOUR opinion? Do you fear skewing the results? I'm pretty sure the Cove crowd is not so easily swayed.

The entity which discovers/detects the nonconformance is responsible for creating the NC. How it gets handled (internally, top officer to top officer, formal request for root cause and corrective action, etc.) ultimately depends on the particular nonconformance, the relationship between levels of the supply chain, and suspicion of root cause.

If the nonconforming paperwork, quantity, or packaging is causing a disruption in the production cycle, I think it belongs in Quality purview for issuing and receiving NC, but certainly, purchasing should be in the loop, especially if they can resolve the entire matter with a quick phone call, rather than a protracted round of "he said, she said" which NC exchanges have been known to generate.

If the count is off because a package got left on a truck is a different issue than if the count is off because each package is labeled with a different count than the actual count. Similarly, labeling which has smudged bar codes is a different issue than packaging with no bar codes when they should be present. If the inspection sheet was inadvertently left on the shipping clerk's desk instead of inserted in package #1 of 10, or inserted in package #2 of 10, is certainly a different issue than if no inspection sheet was ever generated.

Why involve purchasing as an intermediary instead of "an also notified party?" Personally, I prefer ALL records related to quality (product, service, shipping, packaging, etc.) kept in one place with the product or supplier master file so ALL pertinent information is available in one place when evaluating product or supplier for future or continuing business.

__________________

"Few minds wear out; more rust out"
Inscribed over the entrance of Louis Pasteur School, Chicago
Christian Nestell Bovee (1820-1904) in Thoughts, Feelings and Fancies, 1857
  #5  
Old 18th April 2008, 05:21 PM
Coury Ferguson's Avatar
Coury Ferguson Coury Ferguson is offline
Moderator here to help

 
Registration Date: Jan 2006
Location: SoCal
Age: 56
 
Posts: 4,320
Thanks Given to Others: 941
Thanked 622 Times in 511 Posts
Karma Power: 479
Karma: 5830
Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Re: Receiving Discrepancy Report vs Nonconformance Report

I have moved this post to this forum. You should get some other responses. Maybe not today (since it is Friday and most people are off/ready to get off work or going home), but just hang in there.

__________________

"The one thing I want to leave my children is an honorable name." "It is hard to fail, but it is worse never to have tried to succeed." Theodore Roosevelt Chicago, IL, April 10, 1899
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Nonconformance and Corrective Action

Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?


Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
How to write a Nonconformance Report mohammedrenu ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 - Questions and Discussions 16 30th June 2010 04:26 PM
Incoming Quality Receiving Inspection Report sample Mike SAR Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 2 20th July 2009 07:40 PM
Any difference between nonconformance report and record? D.Salman Nonconformance and Corrective Action 2 21st May 2009 10:42 AM
Nonconformance report form format viren ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 - Questions and Discussions 1 10th June 2008 01:18 AM
(DDR) Delivery Discrepancy Report received from customer for late delivery Cordon - 2007 Nonconformance and Corrective Action 3 20th July 2006 10:03 AM



The time now is 12:15 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


   


Marc Timothy Smith - Elsmar.com
8466 LeSourdsville-West Chester Road, Olde West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929
513 341-6272
NOTE: This forum uses "cookies".