The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 17th August 2001, 06:45 AM
MD MD is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Aug 2001
Location: Latvia
Age: 32
 
Posts: 34
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 34
Karma: 10
MD has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Question Supplier evaluation

What methodics do you use to evaluate your suppliers?
As ISO 9001:2000 clause 7.4.1 says "The organization shall evaluate and select suppliers in accordance with organizations requirements."
How exactly do you evaluate them?
Any new ideas, methodics suggerstions would be greatly appreciated !
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 17th August 2001, 09:46 AM
Fire Girl's Avatar
Fire Girl Fire Girl is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Apr 2001
Location: Orillia, Ontario, Canada
Age: 34
 
Posts: 112
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 37
Karma: 20
Fire Girl has less than 100 Karma points so far.
When we initially started our ISO 9001:1994, many of our suppliers we approved on past performance. Now we send out "Inital Quality Survey Checklist" which asks a variety of questions. However, if the company has a registered quality system like ISO or QS 9000 they do not need to complete the survey, just send us a copy of their cert.

If the supplier causes us to generate a significant number of NCR's we may generate a CPAR. We also have a supplier rating system.

I hope I kind of answered your question. Anybody else with some ideas?

Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 17th August 2001, 09:56 AM
tomvehoski tomvehoski is offline
Courtesy Access

Registration Date: May 2001
Location: Warren, MI
 
Posts: 548
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
Karma Power: 67
Karma: 1119
tomvehoski is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.tomvehoski is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.tomvehoski is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.tomvehoski is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.tomvehoski is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.tomvehoski is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.tomvehoski is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.tomvehoski is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.tomvehoski is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.
I agree with the past performance (try to avoid the word "Grandfather") for existing suppliers and surveys. For "mission critical" suppliers I try to do my own audit. Even if they are ISO/QS, it does not mean they are meeting all of MY requirements. I like to do product/process specific audits. During my toy train SQE days I would often drive for four hours to do a 30 minute audit, buy off on production samples, and drive home. Long day, but it was much cheaper than rejection, sort, scrap, remake, late production start, sort some more, scrap some more, late shipment, customer complaints, etc.

Too bad I could never find many manufacturing facilities in Hawaii or Las Vegas.

Tom
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17th August 2001, 03:37 PM
Jim Biz's Avatar
Jim Biz Jim Biz is offline
Forum Moderator

Registration Date: Mar 2000
Location: MID-WEST USA
 
Posts: 486
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Karma Power: 51
Karma: 114
Jim Biz is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.Jim Biz is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.
I Say...

Surveys of their methods
(include all relevant items that standards require)

Personal Visits (do a customer/supplier audit)

Regards
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14th November 2001, 12:42 PM
Trakman's Avatar
Trakman Trakman is offline
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected

Registration Date: Jun 2001
Location: Markham, Ontario, Canada
Age: 46
 
Posts: 38
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0
Karma: 10
Trakman has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Red Face 7.4.1 Supplier Evaluation... How often?

We have been reviewing every supplier annually. We have almost 120 suppliers, and formally reviewing each one annually is a massive effort.

I am considering that suppliers get formally reviewed at the start of a new project/contract (projects/contracts go for 1 to 4 years). Our appproved supplier list indicates when ISO certs expire, stricter incoming inspections, etc... so the monitoring really occurs as an ongoing process during the initial requisition phase.

During the project/contract, for suppliers that cause us headaches, we impose stricter monitoring, tightened incoming inspections, and other techniques to ensure that their quality (lack of) will not affect our product or service.

Does anyone else formally review suppliers on a project/contract basis, not on a calendar time basis?

Thanks!


Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 14th November 2001, 12:49 PM
gpainter gpainter is offline
Courtesy Access

Registration Date: Sep 2001
Location: Southern Indiana
Age: 47
 
Posts: 941
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 29 Times in 25 Posts
Karma Power: 65
Karma: 696
gpainter is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.gpainter is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.gpainter is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.gpainter is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.gpainter is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.gpainter is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.
Default

We send out a survey, may also do an on-site visit,check references and value.
Current suppliers are evaluated on a scoring system based on quality and on-time delivery.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 14th November 2001, 01:04 PM
db's Avatar
db db is offline
Where's the shall?

Registration Date: Jul 2001
Location: Plymouth, MI
Age: 53
 
Posts: 2,202
Thanks Given to Others: 208
Thanked 166 Times in 128 Posts
Karma Power: 129
Karma: 2579
db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.db is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default Supplier Evaluation

I see this to be a two-step process:

1. Determine what you want from your suppliers. Don’t tie yourself into a knot by trying to apply all the supplier requirements to all suppliers. You can have different “rules” for different classes of materials, or even different suppliers. Carrying this to the extreme, you could list kickbacks as a requirement.
2. The second step is deciding how you will evaluate your suppliers based on the requirements outlined in step one. Once again, the evaluations vary from class of material and/or individual supplier. [Personally, I hate surveys.]

The important thing to remember is that the rules are yours. If you publish the rules, and stick to them, you should have no problem.

Hope that helps
Dave B
__________________
Dave B (the other Dave)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 15th November 2001, 09:16 AM
tim banic
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Hehehe... My $.02 worth

We Have the vendor evaluation sheet (1 page long), anything more & they don't bother filling it out.

We are also evaluating all of our suppliers on a regular basis. we will meet with each supplier. Once a week a supplier will come in for a heart to heart visit (until all are done, then we start over), up date information, discuss problems & what we can do for each other to build our relationship. They can be called inearly if we need to.

We also have a probation system in place for evaluation. The 1st 3 deliveries are monitored & inspected thoroughly. If there are no problems with the deliveries (qty, on time, etc.) they are taken off probation. They can be put back on probation if NCR's are issued against them. Purchasing & QC determine that.

We also visit their facility (if possible).

Good Luck
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
ISO 9001 Clause 7.4 Purchasing, Evaluation and Re-Evaluation - Consulting Company Iman Attarzadeh ISO 9001 - Quality Management Systems Standard 15 5th April 2009 08:43 AM
Evaluation of Service Supplier - Third party audit NC against clause 7.4.1 Buetze ISO 19011 and ALL Auditing Discussions 6 8th July 2008 08:15 PM
Supplier Selection - ISO 9001 Clause 7.4.1 - Need Help qualityqueen1974 Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 5 1st May 2008 02:11 PM
Supplier Evaluation - A Form? What shall be done to Effectively evaluate Supplier? balaji_blr Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 4 13th November 2003 07:07 AM
ISO 9001 Clause 4.6.2 - Subcontractor (Supplier) Development Arturo Rosales Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 48 9th June 2003 07:23 PM



The time now is 02:03 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts