|
|
 |
|

30th April 2008, 12:08 PM
|
 |
Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: Jul 2007
Location: Washington, DC, USA
|
|
Posts: 188
Thanks Given to Others: 2
Thanked 117 Times in 78 Posts
Karma Power: 34
|
|
Vote on poll 'bubbles' thread up when someone votes but doesn't post
The ever popular "Six Sigma - Statistical Tools - Valid or Hype? Value? Can a CQE do the same?" thread has a recent post, but I cannot get to it because I can't get past page 26, and the post is on a subsequent page.
Geoff Withnell
|

30th April 2008, 12:12 PM
|
 |
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southeast Wisconsin
Age: 57
|
|
Posts: 9,216
Thanks Given to Others: 755
Thanked 2,297 Times in 1,550 Posts
Karma Power: 612
|
|
Re: Six Sigma Thread issue
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geoff Withnell
The ever popular "Six Sigma - Statistical Tools - Valid or Hype? Value? Can a CQE do the same?" thread has a recent post, but I cannot get to it because I can't get past page 26, and the post is on a subsequent page.
Geoff Withnell
|
It appears that the most recent actual post is this one. Threads that have polls attached will show new posts when someone votes in the poll but doesn't actually post anything (a "feature" I find irritating).
__________________
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.-- Joseph Heller
|

30th April 2008, 12:15 PM
|
 |
Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: Jul 2007
Location: Washington, DC, USA
|
|
Posts: 188
Thanks Given to Others: 2
Thanked 117 Times in 78 Posts
Karma Power: 34
|
|
Re: Six Sigma Thread issue
Thanks, I didn't realize that "feature" existed.
Geoff Withnell
|

1st May 2008, 08:52 AM
|
 |
Cross Forum Moderator
Registration Date: May 2003
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina.
Age: 61
|
|
Posts: 6,626
Thanks Given to Others: 1,318
Thanked 2,233 Times in 1,596 Posts
Karma Power: 377
|
|
Re: Six Sigma Thread issue
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Wynne
It appears that the most recent actual post is this one. Threads that have polls attached will show new posts when someone votes in the poll but doesn't actually post anything (a "feature" I find irritating).
|
I agree. Marc is working on an update of the Cove software. Maybe that's one of the things that will get fixed.
Stijloor.
|

1st May 2008, 09:46 AM
|
 |
Your Elsmar Cove Host
Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,567 Times in 1,019 Posts
Karma Power: 605
|
|
Re: Six Sigma Thread issue
This has come up a number of times and discussed over the years since this software was installed in 2001. If you look at the thread listing in a forum view, you may notice the date column header says: "Last Post or Poll Vote".
It's not a matter of a 'fix'. It is not a 'bug'. It's a setting I can turn on or off. The problem is if it is not set to bubble the thread up when someone adds a vote to a poll you have no way to know that a vote was added. There is no email sent to people who have 'subscribed' to the thread or anything like that. This 'switch' was set a number of years ago because of that.
So - The question becomes, do you want to know when someone adds a vote to a poll (many people 'vote' but don't post) or not. If the switch isn't set to 'bubble the thread up' in the listing when someone votes but doesn't post you will soon loose the thread to history. On a personal level, I want to see when someone votes on a poll but doesn't post. I don't want to have to hunt through a listing of threads I have subscribed to and check every thread with a poll to see if someone has added a vote.
This could be mitigated if we put a close date on every poll and limited the poll to a week or other short time period.
__________________
A Search is a terrible thing to waste!
One Test is Worth 1000 Expert Opinions - The plural of anecdote is not data.
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them. - Unknown
|

1st May 2008, 09:53 AM
|
 |
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southeast Wisconsin
Age: 57
|
|
Posts: 9,216
Thanks Given to Others: 755
Thanked 2,297 Times in 1,550 Posts
Karma Power: 612
|
|
Re: Six Sigma Thread issue
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc
It's not a matter of a 'fix'. It is not a 'bug'.
|
I think it is a "bug" in the sense that when someone votes but doesn't post, the software picks out the last post (which might have been months before) and shows it as a new post. I know it says "most recent post or vote," but there's no way of telling whether it's an actual new post or not without opening the post.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc
This could be mitigated if we put a close date on every poll and limited the poll to a week or other short time period.
|
I think it makes good sense to put time limits on polls. I don't see what's gained by leaving a poll open for years.
__________________
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.-- Joseph Heller
|

1st May 2008, 10:01 AM
|
 |
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southeast Wisconsin
Age: 57
|
|
Posts: 9,216
Thanks Given to Others: 755
Thanked 2,297 Times in 1,550 Posts
Karma Power: 612
|
|
Re: Six Sigma Thread issue
There's a good example here. It's a poll that was intiated six years ago, and when someone recently voted, it brought up this post which is two years old.
__________________
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.-- Joseph Heller
|

1st May 2008, 10:08 AM
|
 |
Cross Forum Moderator
Registration Date: May 2003
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina.
Age: 61
|
|
Posts: 6,626
Thanks Given to Others: 1,318
Thanked 2,233 Times in 1,596 Posts
Karma Power: 377
|
|
Re: Six Sigma Thread issue
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Wynne
I think it is a "bug" in the sense that when someone votes but doesn't post, the software picks out the last post (which might have been months before) and shows it as a new post. I know it says "most recent post or vote," but there's no way of telling whether it's an actual new post or not without opening the post.
I think it makes good sense to put time limits on polls. I don't see what's gained by leaving a poll open for years.
|
I agree. Polls usually deal with an issue that is very relevant at the time it is initiated. I would suggest to keep a poll open for 2 weeks and then available for viewing, but not for voting anymore. What do my Fellow Covers think?
Stijloor.
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|