The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 16th March 2000, 03:05 AM
Konstantin Stavrou
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Question Survey Audit Days (Mandays) - TS 16949

I want to know the MINIMUM number of on-site auditor days which should be spent by the certification body/registrar on initial ISO/TS16949. Excuse me for my bad english.
Our company is QS9000 & VDA 6.1 certified and there are still working 800 employees. We want to combine these norms in one audit.
Our auditor comes every 6 months for three days to our plant to make his surveillance audit. So there are now 3 mandays for QS9000 & VDA 6.1 + ??-mandays for 16949 ???

Thank you.



[This message has been edited by Konstantin Stavrou (edited 23 March 2000).]
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 16th March 2000, 12:07 PM
Christian Lupo
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Lightbulb

Fot initial TS audits, it 12 mandays, for on-going surveillance its 6 days per year.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 17th March 2000, 03:50 PM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is online now
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,852
Thanks Given to Others: 1,892
Thanked 1,563 Times in 1,016 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 604
Karma: 11544
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Question

Christian: Is your info from the TS document?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17th March 2000, 04:21 PM
Christian Lupo
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
No this comes from the 12/6/99 revision of the Automotive Certification Scheme for ISO/TS-16949 Rules for Achieving IATF Recognition Annex 3: Audit Mandays for Certification to ISO/TS-16949. This is the IATF's rules for being an Accredited TS registrar. It is only a draft because it has not been accepted by European Accreditation bodies. Although some registrars are performing TS registrations none of them are sanctioned under an accredited scheme (i.e. RAB,RvA, accredits registrars to Guide 62).

[This message has been edited by Christian Lupo (edited 17 March 2000).]
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20th March 2000, 07:38 AM
Dieter
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
BIG Smile

Regarding Konstantins Request for the amount of audit days there are also ways to reduce the amount of days for the initial audit for TS 16949 to 6 days instead of 12. The amount of surveillance days per year is correct - if you do design and the requested facility does not work under a coporate scheme. IF you are intersted in the specific requirements, please do not hesitate to send me an email or call me at 0049 40 32015-256.

Regarding the command that the accreditation requirements are not published because of european concerns, I can say that the accreditation requirements for the GErman registrars/plants are officialy published long before chrismas last year. The QSACL is also available since four months. Only the english version is still expected. The german accreditation/registration requirements refering to ISO/TS 16949 registration requirements dated June 16, 1999.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 20th March 2000, 10:00 AM
Christian Lupo
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
There are adjustments that can be made for the number of mandays...for example "corporate" certifications.

Dieter is correct, the IATF and the registrars participating in the ISO/TS-16949 pilot program have accepted the terms of the accreditation scheme. It is the accreditation bodies and (of course) the registrars that are not part of the pilot program, that do not agree with the scheme.

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25th April 2000, 07:16 AM
Peter Kraft
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Lightbulb

The mandays for TS 16949 are exactly the same like for the QS 9000 (registration and follow-ups). The only difference is, that the TS certificate is given for a 3 year period which means that after these 3 years you have to suffer a "renovation" or re-certification audit which will require more days than a normal follow-up. You may calculate about 66% of the certification audit.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Required number of auditor days (Audit Man-Days) for AS9100 pigeon AS9100 Aerospace Standard and Requirements 32 11th June 2008 05:45 AM
Audit Days - Our TS 16949 upgrade audit from QS-9000 will be 13 days - Why? ISOPete ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4 10th January 2005 10:09 AM
How many mandays should the ISO9001 registration audit be? Ingeniero1 ISO 19011 and ALL Auditing Discussions 6 12th July 2004 06:11 PM
Number of Required Audit Mandays - TS 16949:2002 Konstantin Stavrou Registrars (Certification Bodies) and Registration 13 6th October 2003 06:22 AM
14001 Registration Audit Mandays Mike Smith ISO 14001 and Environmental Related Standards 3 29th April 2003 10:28 AM



The time now is 03:50 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts