The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 25th February 2000, 12:56 PM
Barb Hayes
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
I Say... QS-9000/TS16949/ISO 9000:2000

If TS 16949 is going to replace QS-9000 and the other European standards, will it be updated to reflect the changes that are going to come through from the ISO 9000:2000 revision? As QS-9000 is derived from ISO 9001, this leaves me wondering.....

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 26th February 2000, 05:39 AM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 605
Karma: 11559
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Yin Yang

I haven't heard anything yet about any plan to coordinate them numerically or otherwise.
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 28th February 2000, 10:45 AM
Roger Eastin Roger Eastin is offline
An Original Cover!

Registration Date: Dec 1998
Location: Greenville, SC
 
Posts: 471
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 54
Karma: 45
Roger Eastin has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Quid Pro Quo

According to an article in ActionLINE, Hank Gryn from Chrysler and Steve Walsh from Ford, ISO/TS 16949 will NOT replace QS9K for the forseeable future. (Of course, I'm not sure what their window of time is for the "forseeable future".) They also mention in the article that since there is a 3 year period to convert to ISO 9000:2000, QS9K will not issue another edition for that length of time. Also, they expect ISO/TS 16949 to be updated by the end of 2001 (to conform with ISO9000:2000). It is an interesting article.
  #4  
Old 28th February 2000, 11:06 AM
Barb Hayes
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Thank you for the information gentlemen. You don't happen to remember what month the article appeared in ActionLine magazine do you Roger? If so, please let me know. I am going to subscribe this week, but will also order the back issue if you can remember.
Thanks again.
  #5  
Old 28th February 2000, 11:44 AM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 605
Karma: 11559
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Yin Yang

Quote:
Originally posted by Roger Eastin:

... ISO/TS 16949 will NOT replace QS9K for the forseeable future.
The important point is that it doesn't matter what happens to QS9000 if Ford, GM and Chrysler accept 16949 in lieu of QS9000 - which is, as I understand it, the case right now.

  #6  
Old 28th February 2000, 03:28 PM
Spaceman Spiff's Avatar
Spaceman Spiff Spaceman Spiff is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Mar 1999
Location: FL
Age: 44
 
Posts: 73
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 45
Karma: 10
Spaceman Spiff has less than 100 Karma points so far.
I Say...

This may be a technicality, but isn't "in lieu" basically in place of? Which means 16949 is taking QS9K's place.
  #7  
Old 29th February 2000, 01:51 AM
Roger Eastin Roger Eastin is offline
An Original Cover!

Registration Date: Dec 1998
Location: Greenville, SC
 
Posts: 471
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 54
Karma: 45
Roger Eastin has less than 100 Karma points so far.
The issue is the current one - Jan/Feb 2000.
  #8  
Old 1st March 2000, 04:30 AM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 605
Karma: 11559
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Yin Yang

They're saying one or the other. But take a look - european automakers are accepting 16949 as are others. For example, as I understand it in Germany VDA 6.1 is the 'current' standard but 16949 will be an aceptable alturnate.

Is QS9000 dead? Not yet but I bet you don't see companies registering to it in 4 years. Yes - in lieu of - instead of.
Closed Thread

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Will OSHAS 18001 be aligned with ISO 9001:2000? Sushil Kumar Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 2 19th March 2005 10:23 AM
ISO 9000:2000 to TS 16949:2000 Gap Assessment Tool Staci ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2 1st July 2003 10:54 AM
AS9100 vs. ISO 9001:2000 - How closely aligned is AS9100 to ISO9001:2000 energy AS9100 Aerospace Standard and Requirements 7 30th January 2003 05:04 PM
QS-9000 vs. ISO 9001:2000 vs. TS 16949 BobD ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5 10th September 2002 04:59 PM
TS 16949 Revision to ISO 9000:2000 Alignment Roger Eastin ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard 12 12th August 2001 02:00 PM



The time now is 11:17 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts