The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Information Resources - Papers - Articles - Etc. > Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notices


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 2nd May 2001, 12:47 PM
qaadrian
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Question Out of Tolerance (OOT) Condition - What is an Out of Tolerance Condition?

We are having a 'spirited discussion' about what constitutes on out of tolerance (OOT) condition for the calibration of customers standards and equipment. As QA I say it's any condition that does not meet the customers contractual requirements, or pass our calibration procedure. This is generally agreed to except in the case when the equipment is in operative. If its inoperative, then some people say its not an out of tolerance condition. Where can I find a clear definition for OOT? I'm interested in learning about other peoples views on this topic. Thanks for the feedback.
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 2nd May 2001, 06:32 PM
Al Dyer
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Question

I guess I need to ask, how does your group define non-operational and if you are talking about a gage being non-operational?

As an example, on occasion we take perfectly good gages out of circulation and tag them as "idle".

Is it operational? I guess it depends on the wording in your system documentation.

As for out of tolerance, your right on the mark.

Maybe some more examples from the Cove Group?

ASD...
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 2nd May 2001, 09:12 PM
Dan Larsen
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
My two cents...

"Out of tolerance" would be unable to meet the customer requirements (defined contractually). I'd be careful about using "my own" tolerances to define out of tolerance. In fact, ISO 17025 prohibits the cal service from making a judgement call of "in" or "out" unless the customer has requested this.

As for inoperative, I guess you could make a case for the gage being OOT; if it can't be used to measure, then it can't measure within the tolerance. In effect, the "as found" would be OOT. However, as a calibration consumer, I think I'd prefer the "as found" to show "Damaged" or "Not Operative" instead of "Out of Tolerance". The statement that the gage is damaged may help me in validating a review of previous results.


Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 2nd May 2001, 09:42 PM
qaadrian
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Sorry, I should have been a bit more specific. We calibrate electrical equipment for customers. We don't have a definition for "non-operational" because not everyone can reach a consesus (its a stubborn group). Thats why I say if you can't take a reading, then it's OOT. Good point about making judgements. We are going to 17025 in the near future. Last bit of info: I did grant certain exceptions - if a fuse is blown or the battery is dead or if it's a typical user function/adjustment, then it's not an OOT. The tech is allowed to fix the problem and then proceed with taking As Found data. Thanks for the feedback so far. I hope I can get a couple more points of view.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 3rd May 2001, 11:19 AM
CarolX's Avatar
CarolX CarolX is offline
Super Moderator

Registration Date: Jun 2000
Location: North of Chicago,Illinois, USA
Age: 49
 
Posts: 2,087
Thanks Given to Others: 419
Thanked 314 Times in 234 Posts
Karma Power: 176
Karma: 4810
CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
I have a question - if the unit is inoperative, how can you call is out of tolerance? If it doesn't work, how can you check it against a standard? We work with standard measuring equipment, i.e. micrometer, calipers. If a set of calipers is dropped, or the gears become jamb, we repair the unit and then subject it to a full calibration.

And for Dan - is your 2 cents worth adjusted for inflation and/or the rising porice of fuel??? LOL

CarolX

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 3rd May 2001, 10:50 PM
Dan Larsen
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
To CarolX...

I generally make it a point to gas up BEFORE a trip to Chi Town. It doesn't save a lot, but it gives me a few extra cents to spend on the Illinois lottery! (I figure you Flatlander's have pulled enough of out of Wisconsin...it's MY turn! )
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 4th May 2001, 11:46 AM
CarolX's Avatar
CarolX CarolX is offline
Super Moderator

Registration Date: Jun 2000
Location: North of Chicago,Illinois, USA
Age: 49
 
Posts: 2,087
Thanks Given to Others: 419
Thanked 314 Times in 234 Posts
Karma Power: 176
Karma: 4810
CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Dan...

LOL!!!!

Shall we confuse the rest of the contributors with a Flatlander vs Cheesehead debate??????

Have a good day!

CarolX
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 4th May 2001, 12:53 PM
qaadrian
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs up

Appreciate all of the feedback. I've decided to define, in writing, "Inoperative" and "Out-of-Tolerance" conditions for the lab using their suggestions. Basically, if you can't perform the cal, it's inoperative. If you can do the cal and the results do not meet the customers or the calibration procedures acceptance criteria, it will be an OOT. Of course, the final decision rests with the customer. Have a good weekend everybody.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Information Resources - Papers - Articles - Etc. > Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations

Bookmarks

Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Thermoplastic Elastomer Tolerance Table - ISO 3302 / RMA tolerance question QMMike Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 2 6th November 2009 01:07 AM
Root Cause Condition / Corrective Action Condition LexieB Problem Solving, Root Cause and Failure Analysis 2 18th September 2009 05:20 PM
Gage R&R Total Tolerance question - Use the full process tolerance? 02SCvette Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 10 4th August 2008 11:18 AM
Determination of M&TE out of tolerance condition and what to do when found Charles Wathen ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories 6 16th April 2004 04:55 PM
Out of Tolerance Condition - Definition of *Significant* Out of Tolerance Condition MRagman Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations 2 15th May 2001 10:49 AM



The time now is 06:35 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts