|
|
 |
|

20th March 2001, 03:39 AM
|
 |
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Mar 2001
Location: Manila, Philippines
Age: 38
|
|
Posts: 639
Thanks Given to Others: 225
Thanked 63 Times in 49 Posts
Karma Power: 73
|
|
Defining Record Retention Times - Is 5 years long enough?
We currently set our record retention for all documents as five years, now we haven't reach the five year mark and our record retention area is now approaching to be full. Slowly, we are transferring some of the records in an electronic format. However, we would like to reduce it to three years retention plus one year in the active file?Would it be okay? Does our auditor would clearly agree with us? How do we define this? How do we classify the following documents to be retained? Please comment.
Thanks,
Raffy
|

20th March 2001, 11:08 AM
|
 |
Super Moderator
Registration Date: Jan 2001
Location: NC, USA
|
|
Posts: 3,140
Thanks Given to Others: 318
Thanked 770 Times in 525 Posts
Karma Power: 255
|
|
|
Record retention is best looked at by your document types, life cycle of your product(s), importance of the information and impact on your, and your customers', business. Also get your financial/legal people involved to help identify items that need to be kept for legal or tax purposes, etc.
If you have records that contain information that is transferred to another form, you may not have to keep them as long as some others. An example might be if you are keying information into your computer systems from forms filled in by hand. Maybe you only want to keep the hand-written records for one year (or less) and the computer record becomes your "official" record. Use your history of data entry accuracy to help you here.
Obviously, if you work in a sector where product life cycles are long and impact on safety is high, you may want to keep records a longer time. But you are not going to add any value by keeping your internal audit records for five years. A typical audit cycle is three years, why hang on to those records for 5, for example.
The problem that I have seen most often is that too many companies just say "we will keep the records for 5, 7, 10 or how many ever years." If you spend a little time up front and figure out how long you really need the records, you can reduce costs dramatically in record retention. 1) man-hours spent moving files to different locations as you run out of room. 2) Additional storage areas, new construction or remodeling. 3) Reduced number of filing cabinets/boxes, etc. 4) If you are really into the tree-hugging (I am) you can often times re-use the folders for items with a less-lengthy retention.
I hope this helps somewhat, I remember the first ISO system I did and record retention seemed like an overwhelming menace. Just look at things with the viewpoint of "How many times do I reference this after 1 year, after 3 years, after 7 years, etc. etc." It's kind of like cleaning out the closets or the utility shed!
|
|
Thanks to SteelMaiden for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
|
|

20th March 2001, 02:05 PM
|
|
|
|
I agree wholeheartedly. A lot of places take the shortcut and blanket their entire system with a retention period that's way too long for many records. I've had situations where the retention period has been defined as short as one week (the daily data was transferred to a summary report each week).
I think the best approach is a record master list that identifies each record in the system. For each record, critically evaluate how far back you really use them. I think you'll be surprised at how infrequently some records are really used.
Remember that you as the supplier have every right to dictate the retention period (as long as your retention doesn't violate a customer requirement). If your retention period is too short and starts affecting the integrity of your quality system, your internal control systems should catch the problem.
|

20th March 2001, 07:31 PM
|
 |
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Mar 2001
Location: Manila, Philippines
Age: 38
|
|
Posts: 639
Thanks Given to Others: 225
Thanked 63 Times in 49 Posts
Karma Power: 73
|
|
Thank you for the quick response.
Raffy
|

1st June 2001, 06:43 AM
|
 |
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Mar 2001
Location: Manila, Philippines
Age: 38
|
|
Posts: 639
Thanks Given to Others: 225
Thanked 63 Times in 49 Posts
Karma Power: 73
|
|
Record Retention
Hi,
Were having a problem in keeping our records. Since in our procedures it must be kept for five years. Our company starts five years ago, and now our retention area for all quality records and documents are all full. What could be the exact retention years we have to specify? Please help me.
Thanks in advance,
Raffy
ffyra@yahoo.com
|

1st June 2001, 08:23 AM
|
 |
Forum Moderator
Registration Date: Mar 2000
Location: MID-WEST USA
|
|
Posts: 486
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Karma Power: 51 Karma: 114  
|
|
In our case - we select retention timeframes according to the importance of the document.
Some are kept 5 years - some are kept for 3 some are "Archived" to computer files every year (which reduces the ammount of space needed) Some are boxed up - identified by date period and stored after 1 years retention. From an ISO viewpoint things like Management review meeting minutes - Ncr files etc. the timeframe for registration is 3 years - so we keep them no longer that that.
Regards
Jim
|

1st June 2001, 10:55 AM
|
|
|
|
The retention of records depends on the organisational policy. This can be described in the company's apex manual. It varies from two years to five years.
|

13th June 2001, 04:03 PM
|
 |
Just Me!
Registration Date: Jun 2001
Location: Southeast USA
|
|
Posts: 482
Thanks Given to Others: 67
Thanked 26 Times in 21 Posts
Karma Power: 63
|
|
|
Don't forget you also need to consider: Customer Contract req, regulatory and statuatory req, as well as the direct value of the informaiton.
We use an off-site Records Management Storage for long-term retention. But you should evaluate the $/benefit as well as consider if you are keeping records in the best 'format type'. If you enter any data into computer - you should only have short-term need for hardcopy retention (presuming, of course, that you have proper file back-up systems in place).
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|