The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Manufacturing, Service, and Business Systems Processes > Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards
Forum Username


Search the Elsmar Cove
Custom Search
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Follow Marc & Elsmar
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed  Marc Smith's Google+ Page  Marc Smith's Linked In Page   Marc Smith's Elsmar Cove YouTube Page  Marc Smith's Facebook Page  Elsmar Cove Twitter Feed
Elsmar Cove Groups
Elsmar Cove Google+ Group  Elsmar Cove LinkedIn Group  Elsmar Cove Facebook Group
Sponsor Links





Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access

Click the graphic above.
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:

Howard's
International Quality Services
Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting
Bob Doering's
Correct SPC - Precision Machining

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook
IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors
SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers
Quality Digest Portal
IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology
ASQ - American Society for Quality

Related Topic Tags
samples and sampling plans, confidence reliability (statistics), reliability analysis and testing
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #1  
Old 5th December 2008, 05:39 PM
doops doops is offline
Involved in Discussions

 
Registration Date: Jul 2008
 
Posts: 10
Thanks Given to Others: 5
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 26
Karma: 10
doops has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Please Help! Validate 99.5% reliability 90% confidence - Sample size calculation

If I state a component is 99.5% reliable at 90% confidence, I can calculate the sample size needed to validate the R&C target is 460 samples. I would expect to see .5% cumulative failures in the field for the life of the product. Sample size = ln(1-C)/ln(R)

Someone has stated if the test is performed using the 95th percentile usage profile (more harsh usage profile than the median user), then I can validate the same reliability using a smaller sample size. For example, I can use a sample size of 22, to meet 99.5% reliability with 90% confidence if I use a 95th percentile usage profile. I expect .5% cumulative failures in the field for the life of the product?

Are the previous statements correct? Can I reduce the sample size from 460 to 22, and validate 99.5% reliability of the population by adjusting the usage profile?

Calculation:
I test to R90/C90, I need 22 samples.
Population Reliability = 1-(1-95th percentile user)(1-Reliability)
=1-(1-.95)(1-.9)
=R99.5%

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 8th December 2008, 06:14 AM
Coury Ferguson's Avatar
Coury Ferguson Coury Ferguson is offline
Moderator here to help

 
Registration Date: Jan 2006
Location: SoCal
Age: 56
 
Posts: 4,321
Thanks Given to Others: 941
Thanked 622 Times in 511 Posts
Karma Power: 478
Karma: 5830
Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Coury Ferguson is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Re: Validate 99.5% reliability 90% confidence - Sample size calculation

Can someone help here?

__________________

"The one thing I want to leave my children is an honorable name." "It is hard to fail, but it is worse never to have tried to succeed." Theodore Roosevelt Chicago, IL, April 10, 1899
Thanks to Coury Ferguson for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 12th December 2008, 05:03 PM
w_grunfeld w_grunfeld is offline
Willy Grunfeld

 
Registration Date: Jul 2005
Location: Israel
 
Posts: 230
Thanks Given to Others: 19
Thanked 68 Times in 53 Posts
Karma Power: 61
Karma: 883
w_grunfeld is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.w_grunfeld is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.w_grunfeld is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.w_grunfeld is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.w_grunfeld is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.w_grunfeld is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.w_grunfeld is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.
Re: Validate 99.5% reliability 90% confidence - Sample size calculation

Someone has stated if the test is performed using the 95th percentile usage profile (more harsh usage profile than the median user), then I can validate the same reliability using a smaller sample size.

I never heard of 95th percentile usage profile and don't know what is meant by that. It doesn't sound right to me. The word harsher sugests you are referring to some accelaration factor. Other than temperature which can be used as an acceleration factor and for which the relationships are known I don't know of any acceleration factor that can be used readily.
Assuming that you are referring to accelerated testing, the test time can be reduced or conversely the sample size if the test time remains unchanged. I wouldn't take that formula as correct unless you have the full reference how is it derived. ooks suspicious to me

__________________

Willy Grunfeld
RAMSQ Consultant
Thanks to w_grunfeld for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  #4  
Old 12th December 2008, 05:18 PM
w_grunfeld w_grunfeld is offline
Willy Grunfeld

 
Registration Date: Jul 2005
Location: Israel
 
Posts: 230
Thanks Given to Others: 19
Thanked 68 Times in 53 Posts
Karma Power: 61
Karma: 883
w_grunfeld is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.w_grunfeld is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.w_grunfeld is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.w_grunfeld is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.w_grunfeld is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.w_grunfeld is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.w_grunfeld is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.
Re: Validate 99.5% reliability 90% confidence - Sample size calculation

"If I state a component is 99.5% reliable at 90% confidence, I can calculate the sample size needed to validate the R&C target is 460 samples. I would expect to see .5% cumulative failures in the field for the life of the product. Sample size = ln(1-C)/ln(R)"

99.5% reliable means there is a 0.995 probability it will fail at time t. You can't "expect" =calculate the number of failures without knowing the failure rate and the time.
90% confidence is just what it sounds- that there is a 90 %probability that the actual reliability will indeed be 99.5% and a 10% chance that it won't.
I don't know where did you take that formula to calculate the sample size....you can't talk about sample size without taking time into consideration. The assumption (for constant failure rate) is that 100 parts operating for 1,000 hours is the same as 1000 parts operating for 100 hours.

__________________

Willy Grunfeld
RAMSQ Consultant
Thanks to w_grunfeld for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  #5  
Old 23rd December 2008, 10:53 AM
doops doops is offline
Involved in Discussions

 
Registration Date: Jul 2008
 
Posts: 10
Thanks Given to Others: 5
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 26
Karma: 10
doops has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Re: Validate 99.5% reliability 90% confidence - Sample size calculation

w_grunfeld, Thanks for your reply!

The sample size equation comes from the number of samples for the lower binomial confidence bound, for a zero failure test. The R&C are life targets, and the zero failure test is for 1 life. I should have clarified.

Thanks again for your response!
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Manufacturing, Service, and Business Systems Processes > Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards

Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?


Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Sample Size and Confidence question for Small Sample Size on Large Lots RMedrano Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 8 17th March 2008 08:01 PM
Finding sample size by using confidence level and probability Nissim Shaked Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 1 19th September 2006 10:04 AM
Sample size selection to make sure 95% confidence detectability rexlee Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 5 14th November 2005 10:57 AM
Sample size to determine confidence interval Benoit Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 5 21st January 2005 09:38 AM
Testing for Process Confidence - Sample Size Mark Smith Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 3 22nd July 1999 10:52 AM



The time now is 01:43 PM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


   


Marc Timothy Smith - Elsmar.com
8466 LeSourdsville-West Chester Road, Olde West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929
513 341-6272