

5th December 2008, 05:39 PM

Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: Jul 2008


Posts: 10
Thanks Given to Others: 5
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 25 Karma: 10


Validate 99.5% reliability 90% confidence  Sample size calculation
If I state a component is 99.5% reliable at 90% confidence, I can calculate the sample size needed to validate the R&C target is 460 samples. I would expect to see .5% cumulative failures in the field for the life of the product. Sample size = ln(1C)/ln(R)
Someone has stated if the test is performed using the 95th percentile usage profile (more harsh usage profile than the median user), then I can validate the same reliability using a smaller sample size. For example, I can use a sample size of 22, to meet 99.5% reliability with 90% confidence if I use a 95th percentile usage profile. I expect .5% cumulative failures in the field for the life of the product?
Are the previous statements correct? Can I reduce the sample size from 460 to 22, and validate 99.5% reliability of the population by adjusting the usage profile?
Calculation:
I test to R90/C90, I need 22 samples.
Population Reliability = 1(195th percentile user)(1Reliability)
=1(1.95)(1.9)
=R99.5%

8th December 2008, 06:14 AM


Moderator here to help
Registration Date: Jan 2006
Location: SoCal
Age: 56


Posts: 4,321
Thanks Given to Others: 941
Thanked 621 Times in 510 Posts
Karma Power: 477


Re: Validate 99.5% reliability 90% confidence  Sample size calculation
Can someone help here?
__________________
"The one thing I want to leave my children is an honorable name." "It is hard to fail, but it is worse never to have tried to succeed." Theodore Roosevelt Chicago, IL, April 10, 1899

Thanks to Coury Ferguson for your informative Post and/or Attachment!


12th December 2008, 05:03 PM

Willy Grunfeld
Registration Date: Jul 2005
Location: Israel


Posts: 228
Thanks Given to Others: 19
Thanked 65 Times in 51 Posts
Karma Power: 59


Re: Validate 99.5% reliability 90% confidence  Sample size calculation
Someone has stated if the test is performed using the 95th percentile usage profile (more harsh usage profile than the median user), then I can validate the same reliability using a smaller sample size.
I never heard of 95th percentile usage profile and don't know what is meant by that. It doesn't sound right to me. The word harsher sugests you are referring to some accelaration factor. Other than temperature which can be used as an acceleration factor and for which the relationships are known I don't know of any acceleration factor that can be used readily.
Assuming that you are referring to accelerated testing, the test time can be reduced or conversely the sample size if the test time remains unchanged. I wouldn't take that formula as correct unless you have the full reference how is it derived. ooks suspicious to me
__________________
Willy Grunfeld
RAMSQ Consultant

Thanks to w_grunfeld for your informative Post and/or Attachment!


12th December 2008, 05:18 PM

Willy Grunfeld
Registration Date: Jul 2005
Location: Israel


Posts: 228
Thanks Given to Others: 19
Thanked 65 Times in 51 Posts
Karma Power: 59


Re: Validate 99.5% reliability 90% confidence  Sample size calculation
"If I state a component is 99.5% reliable at 90% confidence, I can calculate the sample size needed to validate the R&C target is 460 samples. I would expect to see .5% cumulative failures in the field for the life of the product. Sample size = ln(1C)/ln(R)"
99.5% reliable means there is a 0.995 probability it will fail at time t. You can't "expect" =calculate the number of failures without knowing the failure rate and the time.
90% confidence is just what it sounds that there is a 90 %probability that the actual reliability will indeed be 99.5% and a 10% chance that it won't.
I don't know where did you take that formula to calculate the sample size....you can't talk about sample size without taking time into consideration. The assumption (for constant failure rate) is that 100 parts operating for 1,000 hours is the same as 1000 parts operating for 100 hours.
__________________
Willy Grunfeld
RAMSQ Consultant

Thanks to w_grunfeld for your informative Post and/or Attachment!


23rd December 2008, 10:53 AM

Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: Jul 2008


Posts: 10
Thanks Given to Others: 5
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 25 Karma: 10


Re: Validate 99.5% reliability 90% confidence  Sample size calculation
w_grunfeld, Thanks for your reply!
The sample size equation comes from the number of samples for the lower binomial confidence bound, for a zero failure test. The R&C are life targets, and the zero failure test is for 1 life. I should have clarified.
Thanks again for your response!

Lower Navigation Bar


Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)


Thread Tools 
Search this Thread 


Display Modes 
Rate Thread Content 
Linear Mode


Forum Posting Settings

You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off



Similar Discussion Threads

Discussion Thread Title 
Thread Starter 
Forum 
Replies 
Last Post or Poll Vote 
Sample Size and Confidence question for Small Sample Size on Large Lots

RMedrano 
Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 
8 
17th March 2008 08:01 PM 
Finding sample size by using confidence level and probability

Nissim Shaked 
Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 
1 
19th September 2006 10:04 AM 
Sample size selection to make sure 95% confidence detectability

rexlee 
Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 
5 
14th November 2005 10:57 AM 
Sample size to determine confidence interval

Benoit 
Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 
5 
21st January 2005 09:38 AM 
Testing for Process Confidence  Sample Size

Mark Smith 
Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 
3 
22nd July 1999 10:52 AM 

