Elsmar Cove Forum Header Graphic The Elsmar Cove Wiki Sitemap More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar Cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page
NQA-USA
NQA-USA
Miner's MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) Blog 
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Nonconformance and Corrective Action
Forum Username

Wooden Line

Controls for Corrective Actions - A Plan - A Schedule - A Time Limit

Search the Elsmar Cove
Search Elsmar
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Follow Marc & Elsmar
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed  Marc Smith's Google+ Page  Marc Smith's Linked In Page   Marc Smith's Elsmar Cove YouTube Page  Marc Smith's Facebook Page  Elsmar Cove Twitter Feed
Elsmar Cove Groups
Elsmar Cove Google+ Group  Elsmar Cove LinkedIn Group  Elsmar Cove Facebook Group
Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:

Howard's
International Quality Services
Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting
Bob Doering's
Correct SPC - Precision Machining

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook
IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors
SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers
Quality Digest Portal
IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology
ASQ - American Society for Quality
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 26th July 2000, 10:55 AM
AJPaton

 
 
Total Posts: n/a
Question Controls for Corrective Actions

ISO 4.14.2 d) application of controls to ensure that corrective action is taken and that it is effective.

Does this indicate that there should be a:
1) plan for corrective action
2) schedule for corrective action
3) any other time limit for completion of corrective actions?

How do you control that corrective action is taken if you have no proposed close out date?

Thanks,

AJP

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 26th July 2000, 11:13 AM
Jim Biz's Avatar
Jim Biz

 
 
Total Posts: 486
Clown

AJ - Don't know for sure why - but have always "read- TIMLEY" - into this one - sure setting dates is fine and within x days normally works out ..but some reasonably take longer than others .

Regards
Jim
Sponsored Links

  Post Number #3  
Old 26th July 2000, 12:11 PM
AJPaton

 
 
Total Posts: n/a
Read This!

We've got a time limit for coming up with a corrective action plan, but now we're discussing what should be in the plan. Specifically, a completion date for the corrective action.

The assignee is best able to assess how long the action items will take. However, should s/he include that information in the plan?

My argument is that in order to implement controls some due date for action items must be set up.

Can you have controls on the corrective actions without some schedule involved, minimum - projected/required completion date?

I'd say no, but I may be missing something.

Thanks,

AJP

[This message has been edited by AJPaton (edited 26 July 2000).]
  Post Number #4  
Old 27th July 2000, 01:50 AM
Jim Biz's Avatar
Jim Biz

 
 
Total Posts: 486
The Hat

AJ you have a good basis for argument - I see a number of variables & possible good/bad outcomes to each side of the situation.

Quote:
Originally posted by AJPaton:

The assignee is best able to assess how long the action items will take. However, should s/he include that information in the plan?
I for one would tend to agree - the assignee should take origional responsibility and include completion due timing as long as it is "REASONABLE" and "TIMLEY" to the task at hand. A free pass to set a date possibly years down the road is however not a good thing.

The responsibility for accepting the date supplied should/could be agreed and communicated to the assignees superior.

Sad part is that when you start "Setting Dates/timelines" that may/could be missed - what action steps would be included in the plan/procedures to cover a "missing the date issue" ?

It COULD turn into a "if I wait long enough the situation will go away item" and if nothing has been covered on the "what will happen if I just ignore it anyway" syndrome. - That would tend to give ammunition to anyone that really believes this ISO document stuff is "just bull" anyway.

IMHO PROJECTED could work - as long as there is a mechinisim in planning/procedure for moving the projected date due to unseen circumstances that come to light after the origional planning stage.... That way the assignees supierior would retain some semblance of "control" over what is or is not happening/when with the issue.

The final outcome of what works...where depends heavily on the individual workplace environment, commitment and attitudes.

Regards
Jim

[This message has been edited by Marc Smith (edited 28 July 2000).]
  Post Number #5  
Old 14th August 2000, 06:52 PM
Bryan

 
 
Total Posts: n/a
We see setting a reply due date for CAR's issued works ok, but setting a date for actual closure of CAR is more difficult. We had an understanding that a CAR could not be closed until the CA has been validated. Now recently, during an audit, we were told by our auditor that we did not have to wait to varify, in fact we could close the CAR if we accepted the reply, trusted the CA to take place from the CAR. If the CA did not work, we could just issue a new CAR.
I guess my guestion would be, is this a true statement made by the autitor that CAR'S can be closed before we validate the CA ??
Thanks for any input.

Bryan
  Post Number #6  
Old 15th August 2000, 11:12 AM
AJPaton

 
 
Total Posts: n/a
Clown

Bryan,

Our current take on this is that the Corrective Action can be closed when the action items are completed.

However, we then have an "Effectiveness Review" date that is set to check on the efficacy of the corrective action. That's how we set a control on the effectiveness, which I mentioned in my opening for this topic.

Hope this helps.

AJP
  Post Number #7  
Old 15th August 2000, 07:29 PM
Marc's Avatar
Marc

 
 
Total Posts: 24,473
Yin Yang

I think the 'typical' approach is to consider the CA open until effectiveness is confirmed. However, in some instances this may take months or more. Typically a few weeks or so is sufficient time before confirming effectiveness in a high volume production operation.
  Post Number #8  
Old 21st August 2000, 12:17 PM
barb butrym

 
 
Total Posts: 792
For long term complex CA I close them when action is complete and schedule a follow up audit when there is too long a period between...... For simple stuff I followup first, then close.....there is an option box on the CAR for choosing....

Your auditor should not be giving you advice that detailed/specific...it is only his opinion...You can be flexible, as these wounds for CA/PA are self inflicted typically

[This message has been edited by barb butrym (edited 21 August 2000).]
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Nonconformance and Corrective Action

Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?


Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Quality Plan (Inspection, Recording and Corrective Actions) VijayMaldini Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 2 3rd October 2011 03:43 PM
On Time Delivery - Non conformance? Root Causes, Corrective Actions Sardokar ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 - Questions and Discussions 10 11th March 2011 03:26 AM
Improve the Cycle Time of Corrective Actions What have I got myself into shane23 Nonconformance and Corrective Action 7 14th August 2009 06:52 PM
Corrective actions - What frequency do you monitor and take corrective actions Andrews Nonconformance and Corrective Action 3 10th September 2002 08:31 PM
Supplier Corrective Actions - EFFECTIVE corrective actions on CAR's Al Cohen Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 7 17th August 2002 07:12 PM



The time now is 04:06 PM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


   


Marc Timothy Smith - Elsmar.com
8466 LeSourdsville-West Chester Road, Olde West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929
513 341-6272
NOTE: This forum uses "cookies".