The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 14th August 2000, 06:36 PM
sherry
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Question Who's minding the store?

What words of wisdom could you provide to a company that does not have a separate QC function? And, the company does not have an established (formal or informal) quality plan or system.

All departments; Manufacturing, Eng., Sales, service, and Finance have just taken responsibility and accountability for Quality control within their individual departments.

(As far as I’m concerned when this change was made nobody really knew what kind of impact it could (will) have. I do not feel management or even personnel within the department(s) truly understand the methodology of Quality.)

The departments do not have to report on their process, yields, error's, etc. (because thier responsibile); therefore, its like a kid in the candy store, who will know the difference?

I want to provide objective evidence (not just my thought's) this is not the preferred method in managing a company with such diversity. We are about 220 employees and obviously not ISO certified..........

Thanks for your help
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 15th August 2000, 09:30 AM
Kevin Mader's Avatar
Kevin Mader Kevin Mader is offline
One of THE Original Covers!

Registration Date: Nov 1998
Location: Wallingford, CT USA
Age: 43
 
Posts: 1,158
Thanks Given to Others: 22
Thanked 63 Times in 43 Posts
Karma Power: 94
Karma: 1335
Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Kevin Mader
Sherry,

Divided responsibility generally means that nobody is responsible. Unless these departments have a common aim and understanding of quality, then they will ultimately drive in different directions.

Organizations need consistency in direction. This must be provided by management. The need to have an independent function leading the organization is less necessary if Senior management provides good leadership. Still, the Quality function generally helps drive the Quality initiative. Additionally, Senior Management must provide organizational AIM, the initiative to be driven.

Not knowing much about your circumstance, it is difficult to say with any degree of certainty what case you are in. I would guess by your request that you are probably in an organization who views Quality as overhead and believes that by decreeing that "Quality is everyone's job!" it will get done right. If this is true, the Senior Management has not the understanding of how Quality is achieved or recognized its need.

By the way you put it, your organization wants Quality. They don't realize that they NEED Quality. The NEED is driven intrinsically. Sometimes External Forces, such as a Customer requirement, or a very zealous Quality minded individual such as yourself, can drive the need. More so from a Customer than from you, unfortunately. So how can you get Senior Management to recognize this need? That is the trick I suppose.

Regards,

Kevin




Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 15th August 2000, 10:33 AM
sherry
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Yin Yang

Good morning Kevin and thank you for comments. You actually understood the situation at my organization very well! I didn't want to go on and on with my original posting but I believe our senior management has made this decision based on ignorance.

The senior management of this company has been here for the past 20 years not knowing how the world progressed around them (speaking technically of course); therefore, they do not "know" what tools are available to assist their missions and goals.

I have tried to enlighten them as to what a quality structure can do, but as soon as I leave their office (with a vote of confidence), another managers will go in and explain how it won’t work in his/her department. Then my little road I was trying to pave, disappears……..

I wrote a quality plan and all the VP's signed it; however, it became very evident they never read it. I know this is a very TOUGH battle but I'm determined to help my company be world class. (I know they can be and should be; I just have to roll my sleeves up a little higher!)

If you have any suggestions or past experience that can assist me with this tremendous endeavor, I would be grateful if you would pass them along.

Thanks again for your reply,
sherry
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15th August 2000, 11:57 AM
CarolX's Avatar
CarolX CarolX is offline
Super Moderator

Registration Date: Jun 2000
Location: North of Chicago,Illinois, USA
Age: 49
 
Posts: 2,087
Thanks Given to Others: 419
Thanked 314 Times in 234 Posts
Karma Power: 176
Karma: 4810
CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Hello Sherry,

As a quality professional for over 20 years, my goal has always been to eliminate my job and my department. In other words, get each and every person within an organization so quality minded, that I work myself out of a job.

Your situation sounds completely different. I believe your company may have taken it's first step toward closing it's doors.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 16th August 2000, 04:54 AM
Andy Bassett Andy Bassett is offline
An Early Cover

Registration Date: Jun 1999
Location: Donegal Ireland
 
Posts: 278
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 48
Karma: 15
Andy Bassett has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Very interesting subject this. I seem to be able to agree with everyone.

Actually i could agree with the concept of closing down the Quality Dept, if only because as soon as one exists it tends to get saddled with the responsibility for quality, which IMHO is an unhealthy situation.

However, you can only close the QC if the company processes are clear, and the depts themselves are trained to understand what quality is and are capable of measuring it themselves.

Normally this is one of the last steps on the Quality road. Not the first. However closing the QC could be a way of forcing responsibility for QC onto depts. A drastic measure in the short-term.

Could this be what somebody is trying to do.



------------------
Andy B
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 16th August 2000, 10:47 AM
sherry
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Yin Yang

Good morning Andy,

I'm sure your correct in the fact my company is trying to force QC onto the actual departments; however, my concern is the departments really do not know have a concept for Quality.

Most people here feel quality is just to check a part when it comes in the door, not monitor processes, verify inprocess work, etc.

If I knew people had a clear concept of QC I most likely wouldn't worry to the degree I have. You mentioned procedures, policies, work instructions, etc., well, for all practical purposes, we do not have any.....
(I'm in the process of developing a Document Control Procedure, we all agree that this is necessary.)

Thanks sherry
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 16th August 2000, 11:33 AM
Andy Bassett Andy Bassett is offline
An Early Cover

Registration Date: Jun 1999
Location: Donegal Ireland
 
Posts: 278
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 48
Karma: 15
Andy Bassett has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Sounds like an opportunity for a trainer or consultant.

There must be people around you or not too far away that would go along and do something like a free proposal/GAP Analysis for you to give to your Management Team.

Be prepared to be bombarded.

------------------
Andy B

[This message has been edited by Andy Bassett (edited 16 August 2000).]
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 16th August 2000, 02:34 PM
Kevin Mader's Avatar
Kevin Mader Kevin Mader is offline
One of THE Original Covers!

Registration Date: Nov 1998
Location: Wallingford, CT USA
Age: 43
 
Posts: 1,158
Thanks Given to Others: 22
Thanked 63 Times in 43 Posts
Karma Power: 94
Karma: 1335
Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Kevin Mader
Quote:
Originally posted by Andy Bassett:
....Be prepared to be bombarded.

I'll bet you are right!

I am pleased to see that your heart is in the right place Sherry. Helping an organization to World Class status is admirable, but like most of us, you lack a plan.

Well, you came to the right spot. Many wise folks here who can share their experiences with you.

In my mind, you might need to do some preparation work. Create the right atmosphere. I think a good starting point might be to ask Senior Management if they Want Quality or if they Need Quality. See how they respond. Did they use Want or Need in their answer? Do they know the difference? In my experience, most answer that they Want Quality and most do not know the difference. This allows me to segway into the difference betweening wanting and needing something. Teach them. They need to understand that Quality IS necessary for business. If they can cognitively discount Quality, then you might be wasting your time trying to change their minds. Quality in their minds does not add value and isn't necessary to make a sale, and, ultimately profit. It will take something much larger, such as a large account lost, reduced profit or sales, leading to worse. It produces negative Intrinsic Motivation leading to layoffs and filing for bankruptsy protection just to stay in business. That is emergence through EMERGENCY folks, a very External motivational factor. And, it often comes too late! Can we spare our organizations this fate?

Regards,

Kevin



[This message has been edited by Kevin Mader (edited 16 August 2000).]
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
How do QFD (Quality Function Deployment) & KANO MODEL fit in a quality system? KHAN786 Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 10 26th January 2008 12:22 PM
Setting Up an Internal Audit Function for a UK Financial Services Company Sharon13 Training - Internal, External and Distance Learning 10 11th October 2007 10:05 AM
Does Quality Engineering have a role in QFD (Quality Function Deployment)? sushant_kulkarni APQP and PPAP 1 20th July 2007 08:26 AM
centralized document control susanmh Documentation Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 5 5th April 2000 04:07 PM
Auditing the Development function of my company - Strictly a Desk Audit? Mark Smith ISO 19011 and ALL Auditing Discussions 5 27th October 1999 11:05 AM



The time now is 12:04 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts