|
Elsmar Cove Forum Sidebar
|
|
|
|
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
|
| Monitor New Forum Posts
|
|
Follow Marc & Elsmar
|
|
|
Elsmar Cove Groups
|
|
|
Sponsor Links
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access
|
 |
|
Sponsored Links
|
|
|
|
Courtesy Quick Links
|
 Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:
Howard's International Quality Services
Atul's Symphony Technologies
Marcelo Antunes' SQR Consulting
Bob Doering's Correct SPC - Precision Machining
NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook
IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors
SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers
Quality Digest Portal
IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology
ASQ - American Society for Quality
|
|
 |

28th February 2009, 12:05 AM
|
|
Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: Feb 2009
Location: india
|
|
Posts: 13
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 19 Karma: 10 
|
|
Acceptance criteria for visual defects of electronic components
Hi
i m an in charge for inward good inspection in electronic manufacturing industry ,
i have a few problem while accepting the components, i m unable to fix the acceptance criteria for visual inspection for electronic component
eg: we received the ceramic disc capacitor where the powder coating near lead got damaged during forming of lead . , these components used for medical project
i know there is no harm to performance of the component but i could not able to convince our production team with our proof
Please help me to sort out this issue by providing the acceptance criteria for visual defects
Requirement of AS9100 and 13485
Please help
ramesh
|

28th February 2009, 02:16 AM
|
|
Super Moderator
Registration Date: Sep 2005
Location: Johore/Malaysia
|
|
Posts: 5,957
Thanks Given to Others: 1,409
Thanked 2,750 Times in 1,911 Posts
Karma Power: 662
|
|
|
Re: Acceptance criteria for visual defects of electronic components
Quote:
|
Please help me to sort out this issue by providing the acceptance criteria for visual defects
|
So you want us, people who do not know anything about your product, what market segment you served, which/what clients you served and what product you manufacture to provide acceptance criteria to you for something very subjective? Doesn't make sense isn't?
Such criterias should normally come from your customer. If not then you need to set one yourself (within your organization) - make sure you do it in consultation with people who are experienced enough to know the market in general as well as what others are doing.
If you already had one, do you have customer complains on this issue? If so, you may need to tighten. If not, why do you need to change it since you mentioned that it does not affect performance.
|

28th February 2009, 02:24 AM
|
 |
Consultant / Auditor
Registration Date: Feb 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
|
Posts: 3,414
Thanks Given to Others: 1,303
Thanked 1,683 Times in 1,109 Posts
Karma Power: 393
|
|
|
Re: Acceptance criteria for visual defects of electronic components
Rameshs,
Find a couple of people to work with you on this. THey need experience & especially must know what 'good' things should look like and what 'bad things' might look like.
Go through a number of items (eg, stuff already accepted), and get them to talk aloud about what makes each thing/s 'good/OK to accept'. You may need to ask them specific questions to prompt them.
Once you've got that list of criteria, then turn attention to the opposite. Ask them to give you examples / identify 'bad ones' that should not be accepted or that require review.
One good way to do this may be to take pictures (digital cameras make this easy) and use them as illustrative examples (eg, post on wall in inspection place). If/next time something is accepted that shouldn't have been, find out why and add that to the pics/list.
It will take you a little while, but you need to develop these criteria internally. Plus it gets people involved, which is always a good thing.
__________________
people call me a feminist whenever I express sentiments that differentiate me from a doormat. Rebecca West
|

28th February 2009, 04:26 AM
|
|
Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: Feb 2009
Location: india
|
|
Posts: 13
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 19 Karma: 10 
|
|
|
Re: Acceptance criteria for visual defects of electronic components
Dear Jane
Thanks for your inputs , it helped me to proceed further in problem solving
thanks a lot
regards
ramesh
|

28th February 2009, 09:46 PM
|
 |
Consultant / Auditor
Registration Date: Feb 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
|
Posts: 3,414
Thanks Given to Others: 1,303
Thanked 1,683 Times in 1,109 Posts
Karma Power: 393
|
|
|
Re: Acceptance criteria for visual defects of electronic components
Rameshs,
You're welcome. Don't ignore customer perception either as Harry points out.
Even if something doesn't affect performance (I don't know what, because I don't know the product, but suppose it was fine scratches on what's normally a smooth surface), if your customers don't like the look, & thus get a perception that what you produce 'isn't good' - even if it works perfectly, they'll not be happy.
__________________
people call me a feminist whenever I express sentiments that differentiate me from a doormat. Rebecca West
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Forum Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Discussion Threads
|
| Discussion Thread Title |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post or Poll Vote |
|
Effectiveness of 200% Visual Inspection to Identify Defects and Defectives
|
beaser3 |
Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics |
32 |
7th December 2010 11:50 AM |
|
High Technology Visual Inspection for Casting and Forging Parts - Zero Defects
|
Chennaiite |
Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics |
11 |
7th December 2009 09:09 AM |
|
Visual Acceptance Criteria for Porosity in Ferrous Castings
|
RayZ-Insp |
Manufacturing and Related Processes |
4 |
25th August 2008 08:31 AM |
|
Visual inspection and acceptance criteria
|
kcallaway |
Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics |
1 |
7th August 2008 02:50 AM |
|
Acceptance Criteria for Attribute Data Sampling Plans shall be Zero Defects
|
Joe_1 |
Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics |
14 |
14th January 2008 10:49 AM |
|
|