The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Auditing Quality and Environmental Management Systems > Auditing Discussions
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

AS9100 Audit Cycle


Elsmar XML RSS Feed
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links



Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Standards Organization - ISO Standards and Information

Atul's
Quality Forum Online

Howard's
International Quality Services

Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum

Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Related LinkedIn Groups

ISO 9001 for Small Businesses

ISO 9001:2015 Revision Discussions

Information Security Community

Medical Devices Group

Quality and Regulatory Network

FDA (Food and Drugs)

AS91XX Series - Tips and Advice


Related Topic Tags
audits and auditing, as9100 - aerospace quality management systems
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 3rd March 2009, 03:50 PM
Bob the QE

 
 
Total Posts: 172
Please Help! AS9100 Audit Cycle

We are prepping for our AS registration audit and we are struggling with an issue concerning audit cycles. We call in our ISO system that our QMS will be fully audited at a minimum of twice yearly, and we have met this. While prepping for our AS audit we are also keeping the ISO ball in the air. So our internal audit schedule was set to ISO. We did keep the twice a year requirement in the AS procedure, being we have not went through a complete year buy our AS audit I would not expect this to be a problem. Othere audits or assesments to AS9100 we have had in this year time frame are;
a) A GAP analysis - Findings detailed but not in CA form
b) We had one internal audit of the entire QMS to AS9100, CA's written.
c) One ISO audit of the entire QMS CA's written
d) An audit to AS9100 by a consultant. No formal CA's written.
e) Stage 1 and doc. review by our regristrar. CA's written.

Looking for opinions as to whether or not we may have a major issue just on the frequency or issua as to whether or not we have went through and entire audit cycle to AS9100?

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 3rd March 2009, 04:20 PM
Coury Ferguson's Avatar
Coury Ferguson

 
 
Total Posts: 4,316
Re: AS9100 Audit Cycle

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Bob the QE View Post

We are prepping for our AS registration audit and we are struggling with an issue concerning audit cycles. We call in our ISO system that our QMS will be fully audited at a minimum of twice yearly, and we have met this. While prepping for our AS audit we are also keeping the ISO ball in the air. So our internal audit schedule was set to ISO. We did keep the twice a year requirement in the AS procedure, being we have not went through a complete year buy our AS audit I would not expect this to be a problem. Othere audits or assesments to AS9100 we have had in this year time frame are;
a) A GAP analysis - Findings detailed but not in CA form
b) We had one internal audit of the entire QMS to AS9100, CA's written.
c) One ISO audit of the entire QMS CA's written
d) An audit to AS9100 by a consultant. No formal CA's written.
e) Stage 1 and doc. review by our regristrar. CA's written.

Looking for opinions as to whether or not we may have a major issue just on the frequency or issua as to whether or not we have went through and entire audit cycle to AS9100?
I don't think there will be an issue with your frequencies in my opinion. I would make sure that before your Assessment you cover the added requirement to AS9100.

One thing to consider: If there are findings by the Registrar during the Stage 2 assessment (initially) your registration will be held in limbo until the CA are closed out, by the Registrar. It maybe required to have a "special" on-site visit to close out the CA's.
Sponsored Links

  Post Number #3  
Old 3rd March 2009, 06:50 PM
AndyN's Avatar
AndyN

 
 
Total Posts: 8,456
Look! Re: AS9100 Audit Cycle

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Bob the QE View Post

We are prepping for our AS registration audit and we are struggling with an issue concerning audit cycles. We call in our ISO system that our QMS will be fully audited at a minimum of twice yearly, and we have met this. While prepping for our AS audit we are also keeping the ISO ball in the air. So our internal audit schedule was set to ISO. We did keep the twice a year requirement in the AS procedure, being we have not went through a complete year buy our AS audit I would not expect this to be a problem. Othere audits or assesments to AS9100 we have had in this year time frame are;
a) A GAP analysis - Findings detailed but not in CA form
b) We had one internal audit of the entire QMS to AS9100, CA's written.
c) One ISO audit of the entire QMS CA's written
d) An audit to AS9100 by a consultant. No formal CA's written.
e) Stage 1 and doc. review by our regristrar. CA's written.

Looking for opinions as to whether or not we may have a major issue just on the frequency or issua as to whether or not we have went through and entire audit cycle to AS9100?
I cannot fathom why you didn't get an NC from previous CB audits

How do you comply with the requirement to "establish an audit program....based on status and importance......." if you only audit twice a year? I for one would be very interested to know how you addressed that, or if you were even asked about it, Bob! Take a look at ISO 9004 for guidance or read this http://www.nqa-usa.com/articles/arti...tail.php?id=48
  Post Number #4  
Old 3rd March 2009, 09:38 PM
Bob the QE

 
 
Total Posts: 172
Re: AS9100 Audit Cycle

I don't get your response, we feel the entire QMS is important. That's why it is audited in its entirity are bi-annually. Our Daily, weekly,monthly activities with in the QMS monitor and report on those activities identified in our quality objectives. We also have our registrars audits ever 6 months so we are having our QMS audited 4 times a year at least for the first two years of registration to AS9100.

What type of additional info could I provide you to get your further input on the comments. I am interested in your view

Thank you
  Post Number #5  
Old 4th March 2009, 08:42 AM
AndyN's Avatar
AndyN

 
 
Total Posts: 8,456
Lightbulb Re: AS9100 Audit Cycle

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Bob the QE View Post

I don't get your response, we feel the entire QMS is important. That's why it is audited in its entirity are bi-annually. Our Daily, weekly,monthly activities with in the QMS monitor and report on those activities identified in our quality objectives. We also have our registrars audits ever 6 months so we are having our QMS audited 4 times a year at least for the first two years of registration to AS9100.

What type of additional info could I provide you to get your further input on the comments. I am interested in your view

Thank you
Well, Bob, your CB audits don't count as far as your own internal audit program is concerned, of course.

Basically, by auditing the whole QMS every six months you are treating all processes as equal (or very close). I'd venture to suggest that they aren't, even by your own managements' reckoning. During any period in business, some 'parts' of the system need to come under closer scrutiny than others. This is often indicated by the items in my article - risk and impact.....

Your approach is emulating the CB so they often see nothing wrong with that, but it's often not much use to your management to assure them that when risk is encountered, the qms is used to control the situation.

Did you read my article in the link? Was it not clear to you?
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Auditing Quality and Environmental Management Systems > Auditing Discussions

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Implementing an AS9100 Quality System - Stage 1 Audit for AS9100 is Oct 2012 mlaurie AS9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 22 20th July 2012 11:55 AM
3 Year Audit Cycle (ISO 17021:2011) PaulChad69 Auditing Discussions 2 3rd February 2012 06:19 AM
TS 16949 Audit Cycle for Remote Locations aeatm TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard 17 10th January 2012 02:06 PM
Internal Audit Requirements - All clauses and subclauses covered over the audit cycle Robert Soares Internal Auditing 9 10th December 2005 11:49 PM



The time now is 08:21 PM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


 


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies" -- The Elsmar Cove is *Copyright Free*.
A Peachfarm LLC Internet Property