The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Quality Manager Issues > Quality Management Related Issues


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11th March 2009, 05:01 AM
ccHoongcc ccHoongcc is offline
Shy Poster (1 to 5 Posts)

Registration Date: Mar 2009
Location: Malaysia
 
Posts: 2
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 3
Karma: 10
ccHoongcc has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Please Help! How to improve the yield of a highly workmanship-dependent process.

One of our product are have the yield 60 - 70% (this consider very low), therefore we start to find out a way to improve this. However, we found that 1 defect may come from few different different root cause. This is because our product is too dependant on the workmanship such as a wire bonding (microwave industrial). and because of this, the defect is not direct pin point to certain process or rootcause therefore we found difficulty on controlling the process. How to improve the yield of the product, can someone advice? what is the correct system or tool may help? someone at microwave industrial please kindly advice?
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 11th March 2009, 05:41 PM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 605
Karma: 11559
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Default Re: How to improve the yield of a highly workmanship-dependent process.

Does anyone have any advice on improving workmanship dependent processes?
__________________
A Search is a terrible thing to waste!
One Test is Worth 1000 Expert Opinions - The plural of anecdote is not data.
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them. - Unknown
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 11th March 2009, 05:55 PM
Stijloor's Avatar
Stijloor Stijloor is offline
Cross Forum Moderator

Registration Date: May 2003
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina.
Age: 61
 
Posts: 6,619
Thanks Given to Others: 1,315
Thanked 2,232 Times in 1,595 Posts
Karma Power: 377
Karma: 10934
Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Stijloor is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default Re: How to improve the yield of a highly workmanship-dependent process.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ccHoongcc View Post

One of our product are have the yield 60 - 70% (this consider very low), therefore we start to find out a way to improve this. However, we found that 1 defect may come from few different different root cause. This is because our product is too dependant on the workmanship such as a wire bonding (microwave industrial). and because of this, the defect is not direct pin point to certain process or rootcause therefore we found difficulty on controlling the process. How to improve the yield of the product, can someone advice? what is the correct system or tool may help? someone at microwave industrial please kindly advice?
Welcome to The Cove Forums!

There are various sources of information available on the 'net. I am not an expert at this, but there are some firms that provide advice. Also, there are technical papers written and available, but you have to pay for them.

Any other Covers that can help?

Stijloor.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12th March 2009, 07:22 AM
e006823 e006823 is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: Nov 2003
Location: East Coast
 
Posts: 149
Thanks Given to Others: 2
Thanked 26 Times in 20 Posts
Karma Power: 33
Karma: 324
e006823 is appreciated, and has over 300 Karma points.e006823 is appreciated, and has over 300 Karma points.e006823 is appreciated, and has over 300 Karma points.e006823 is appreciated, and has over 300 Karma points.
Default Re: How to improve the yield of a highly workmanship-dependent process.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ccHoongcc View Post

One of our product are have the yield 60 - 70% (this consider very low), therefore we start to find out a way to improve this. However, we found that 1 defect may come from few different different root cause. This is because our product is too dependant on the workmanship such as a wire bonding (microwave industrial). and because of this, the defect is not direct pin point to certain process or rootcause therefore we found difficulty on controlling the process. How to improve the yield of the product, can someone advice? what is the correct system or tool may help? someone at microwave industrial please kindly advice?
ccHoongcc,

Can you tell us what your current wire bonding process is?


regards,
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12th March 2009, 10:16 AM
prototyper's Avatar
prototyper prototyper is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Age: 47
 
Posts: 267
Thanks Given to Others: 50
Thanked 116 Times in 84 Posts
Karma Power: 36
Karma: 1242
prototyper is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.prototyper is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.prototyper is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.prototyper is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.prototyper is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.prototyper is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.prototyper is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.prototyper is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.prototyper is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.
Default Re: How to improve the yield of a highly workmanship-dependent process.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ccHoongcc View Post

One of our product are have the yield 60 - 70% (this consider very low), therefore we start to find out a way to improve this. However, we found that 1 defect may come from few different different root cause. This is because our product is too dependant on the workmanship such as a wire bonding (microwave industrial). and because of this, the defect is not direct pin point to certain process or rootcause therefore we found difficulty on controlling the process. How to improve the yield of the product, can someone advice? what is the correct system or tool may help? someone at microwave industrial please kindly advice?
Study the process to determine the best method of manufacture. This should involve considerable input from the people actually performing the work.
Document the best method as a standard operating procedure (SOP).
Train all people doing the job to the SOP.
Explain to them how the part they are making works and the problems created if the part is defective.
Have the next person in the process perform checks to ensure the previous operation is correct.
Test them to ensure they have understood the training.
Audit the area periodically to ensure everyone is following the SOP.

People do make mistakes. The best way to reduce these mistakes is to standardise the process and encourage discipline.

Study Poka Yoke or foolproofing techniques and implement them where possible.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12th March 2009, 10:26 AM
Sidney Vianna's Avatar
Sidney Vianna Sidney Vianna is offline
Post responsibly

Registration Date: Oct 2001
Location: Long Beach, CA - USofA
 
Posts: 4,951
Thanks Given to Others: 688
Thanked 1,910 Times in 1,083 Posts
Karma Power: 467
Karma: 16787
Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Sidney Vianna is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default Re: How to improve the yield of a highly workmanship-dependent process.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ccHoongcc View Post

This is because our product is too dependant on the workmanship such as a wire bonding (microwave industrial). and because of this, the defect is not direct pin point to certain process or rootcause therefore we found difficulty on controlling the process. How to improve the yield of the product, can someone advice?
If you can't automate the process, you should consider an operator certification program whereby a clearly established criteria exists to qualify operators performing tasks that require special skills. Only certified operators would be allowed to perform work. Once this is in place, you want to make sure that all potential sources for variation are eliminated/mitigated, including operator visual fatigue due to repetitive work.

Once a defect is observed, engage the operator on the discussion if/how the problem could have been avoided.
__________________
Fighting organizational dysfunction, one post at a time.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 19th March 2009, 01:37 AM
ccHoongcc ccHoongcc is offline
Shy Poster (1 to 5 Posts)

Registration Date: Mar 2009
Location: Malaysia
 
Posts: 2
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 3
Karma: 10
ccHoongcc has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default Re: How to improve the yield of a highly workmanship-dependent process.

When we test it at the end of the process, we found failure at certain test such as frequency test fail or so on... but once we feedback to production, they may due to different root cause.

What is the solution? any advice?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Quality Manager Issues > Quality Management Related Issues

Bookmarks

Tags
improvement, workmanship, yield


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Normalized vs. Rolled Throughput Yield - First Pass Yield metrics for our processes equesnel Manufacturing and Related Processes 6 8th September 2009 10:26 AM
How to define and Calculate the DPU, DPMU, DPMO, Yield, Rolled Throughput Yield (RTY) billlin Manufacturing and Related Processes 3 1st July 2009 08:34 AM
Calculating Throughput Yield or Yield ballastrae Six Sigma 10 17th January 2008 11:07 AM
Rolled Throughput Yield (RTY) Calculations for a Sequential Process HDR Six Sigma 2 12th January 2007 09:21 PM
Help me to calculate the yield and process quality in terms of the dpmu chiuinggum SPC Monitoring and Statistical Analysis Techniques 8 31st January 2006 06:59 PM



The time now is 02:46 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts