The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Benchmarking > Benchmarking - Methods and General Discussions


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 16th March 2009, 01:31 PM
SurveyLady SurveyLady is offline
Shy Poster (1 to 5 Posts)

Registration Date: Mar 2009
Location: Minnesota
 
Posts: 1
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 3
Karma: 10
SurveyLady has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Question Satisfaction scales - positive to negative or negative to positive

Are there rules about how to list a satisfaction scale, such as Strongly Agree to Disagree? We generally list the scale negative to positive if using a matrix design (online or mail survey). If we list the options below a question, should we start with the negative or positive? Is there a difference if we're asking the question in a phone survey?
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 16th March 2009, 01:58 PM
Ted Schmitt's Avatar
Ted Schmitt Ted Schmitt is offline
$ Contributor

Registration Date: Oct 2006
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
Age: 41
 
Posts: 614
Thanks Given to Others: 250
Thanked 241 Times in 178 Posts
Karma Power: 57
Karma: 1637
Ted Schmitt is appreciated, and has over 1500 Karma points.Ted Schmitt is appreciated, and has over 1500 Karma points.Ted Schmitt is appreciated, and has over 1500 Karma points.Ted Schmitt is appreciated, and has over 1500 Karma points.Ted Schmitt is appreciated, and has over 1500 Karma points.Ted Schmitt is appreciated, and has over 1500 Karma points.Ted Schmitt is appreciated, and has over 1500 Karma points.Ted Schmitt is appreciated, and has over 1500 Karma points.Ted Schmitt is appreciated, and has over 1500 Karma points.Ted Schmitt is appreciated, and has over 1500 Karma points.Ted Schmitt is appreciated, and has over 1500 Karma points.
Send a message via MSN to Ted Schmitt
Default Re: Satisfaction scales - positive to negative or negative to positive

Welcome to the Cove !!

Being the optimistic person I am, I would always start with the positive first...

You might want to check ISO 10001:2007 - Guideline for Customer Satisfaction. Not sure it will have your answer there, but might be a good starting point.
__________________
Ted

Nothing is difficult, you just didn´t understand it yet...
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 26th March 2009, 02:58 PM
warton-john warton-john is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: Apr 2006
Location: UK
 
Posts: 10
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 17
Karma: 112
warton-john is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.warton-john is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.
Default Re: Satisfaction scales - positive to negative or negative to positive

I don't think that there is any real convention on layout i.e. whether to show scales as positive to negative or negative to positive.

Would be worth ensuring consistency across a number of questions though, not to confuse the respondant therefore make all scales range the same way (whichever way you choose).

Also, for rating type scales it would be sensible to have an even number of choices (scores) that the respondant has to choose from (this forces a decison to be made) rather than just select the middle option when there is an odd number of choices.

You may decide you want to have more positive choices than negative choices or vice versa - depends on what you expect the results might be and how discreetly you want to measure the scores. Also, a larger amount of positive choices might allow for more incremental improvement to be measured.

Hope this is useful.

All the best.

John.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 27th March 2009, 09:55 AM
SteelMaiden's Avatar
SteelMaiden SteelMaiden is offline
Super Moderator

Registration Date: Jan 2001
Location: NC, USA
 
Posts: 3,139
Thanks Given to Others: 318
Thanked 770 Times in 525 Posts
Karma Power: 255
Karma: 7897
SteelMaiden is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.SteelMaiden is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
SteelMaiden is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.SteelMaiden is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.SteelMaiden is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.SteelMaiden is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.SteelMaiden is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.SteelMaiden is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.SteelMaiden is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.SteelMaiden is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.SteelMaiden is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.SteelMaiden is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.SteelMaiden is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.SteelMaiden is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default Re: Satisfaction scales - positive to negative or negative to positive

I usually see negative to positive, as the scales are typically numeric, no?
1=strongly disagree 5=strongly agree?
__________________
"It's fun to have fun, but you have to know how", Dr. Seuss
Man may have invented fire, it took a woman to learn how to play with it.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 2nd April 2009, 04:46 AM
JaneB's Avatar
JaneB JaneB is offline
Consultant / Auditor

Registration Date: Feb 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
 
Posts: 1,868
Thanks Given to Others: 599
Thanked 783 Times in 528 Posts
Karma Power: 174
Karma: 6073
JaneB is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.JaneB is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
JaneB is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default Re: Satisfaction scales - positive to negative or negative to positive

Quote:
Originally Posted by warton-john View Post

Would be worth ensuring consistency across a number of questions though, not to confuse the respondant therefore make all scales range the same way (whichever way you choose).
Good advice, John.

You particularly want to watch out for the 'donkey vote' - ie, assume one is happy, and that almost all the questions in that case would be ticked at the RH end of the scale. Avoid the one or two questions that actually require the left side to be ticked instead.
__________________
Regards, Jane
Intelligent quality: practical, simple & flexible
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 2nd April 2009, 01:28 PM
warton-john warton-john is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: Apr 2006
Location: UK
 
Posts: 10
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 17
Karma: 112
warton-john is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.warton-john is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.
Default Re: Satisfaction scales - positive to negative or negative to positive

Quote:
Originally Posted by JaneB View Post

Good advice, John.

You particularly want to watch out for the 'donkey vote' - ie, assume one is happy, and that almost all the questions in that case would be ticked at the RH end of the scale. Avoid the one or two questions that actually require the left side to be ticked instead.
Jane,

I am sure that this catches a lot of people out.

As well as ranging the scales in one direction only e.g. left (poor) to right (excellent) or vice versa, I would say that if possible make the scoring consistent as well i.e. score all questions in the same number range e.g. scores for each question range 1-4 or 1-10 or something similar but not mixed ranges.

I would make sure that an optional free format comments box is also available for each question. Raw numbers do not provide the whole story as we all know, and a Customer Satisfaction Survey is a real chance to gather customer feedback, and we need to get as much value from the Survey as we can.

Regards,

John.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 2nd April 2009, 06:01 PM
JaneB's Avatar
JaneB JaneB is offline
Consultant / Auditor

Registration Date: Feb 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
 
Posts: 1,868
Thanks Given to Others: 599
Thanked 783 Times in 528 Posts
Karma Power: 174
Karma: 6073
JaneB is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.JaneB is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
JaneB is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default Re: Satisfaction scales - positive to negative or negative to positive

Excellent advice all round, John. I agree with all you say.

I'm always strongly in favour of the free format part for the various reasons you describe. And I particularly dislike any kind of form that either omits it, or allocates such a stingy amount of space that I figure they're seriously NOT interested in hearing. (I never bother completing such forms myself, either).
__________________
Regards, Jane
Intelligent quality: practical, simple & flexible
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Benchmarking > Benchmarking - Methods and General Discussions

Bookmarks

Tags
customer satisfaction, customer satisfaction index, iso 10001


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Is the normal Cpk calculation applicable for data with positive & negative values? Anonaman Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. 4 11th August 2009 08:54 AM
Anybody seeing negative trends with Connector manufacturers? MCTiki Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 4 15th June 2009 05:09 PM
Is it possible to get a negative Cpk value? preetham Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. 13 13th February 2006 04:47 PM
Customer Poll (Satisfaction Measurement) - Meeting Requirements but Negative Replies Carlos Echeverry ISO 9001 - Quality Management Systems Standard 8 16th May 2005 10:42 AM
Negative Views of Quality in One Word? Randy Philosophy, Gurus, Controversy and Evolution 27 26th January 2004 11:06 AM



The time now is 07:05 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts