The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard > QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10th November 1998, 09:01 PM
Dawn Dawn is offline
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected

Registration Date: Sep 1998
Location: St. Marys, PA
 
Posts: 302
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0
Karma: 40
Dawn has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Question What exactly is needed on the subcontractor list for evaluating subcontractors

What exactly is needed on the subcontractor list for evaluating subcontractors.
Our list is extremely lengthy, including box companies, Starret gage suppliers (buying from a catalog), etc.
Can anyone specify exactly what we evaluate and what we don't?
Thanks, Dawn
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 11th November 1998, 05:45 PM
Dawn Dawn is offline
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected

Registration Date: Sep 1998
Location: St. Marys, PA
 
Posts: 302
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0
Karma: 40
Dawn has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

Kevin,
Thank you for the input.
I was considering using only material providers, calibration labs, and secondary machinist companies. Think that will work?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 11th November 1998, 06:06 PM
Kevin Mader's Avatar
Kevin Mader Kevin Mader is offline
One of THE Original Covers!

Registration Date: Nov 1998
Location: Wallingford, CT USA
Age: 43
 
Posts: 1,158
Thanks Given to Others: 22
Thanked 63 Times in 43 Posts
Karma Power: 94
Karma: 1335
Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Kevin Mader
Default

Dawn,

You're welcome. Looks like a good start. Don't forget to include consulting sources you may be using and your registrar. On my way out the door, but I'll try to visit here tomorrow if something else comes to mind. Good luck.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12th November 1998, 01:15 AM
Kevin Mader's Avatar
Kevin Mader Kevin Mader is offline
One of THE Original Covers!

Registration Date: Nov 1998
Location: Wallingford, CT USA
Age: 43
 
Posts: 1,158
Thanks Given to Others: 22
Thanked 63 Times in 43 Posts
Karma Power: 94
Karma: 1335
Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Kevin Mader is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Kevin Mader
Default

Dawn,

Some thoughts on an Approved Supplier List. You should probably include:

-Vendor's On-time Delivery Rating (4.6.2.2)
-Vendor's Quality Rating (4.6.2.a, Quality System, or, an expected registration date and current Quality Rating)
-All suppliers required by your Customers (4.6.1.1)

I would also:

-Break down suppliers by type (ie. direct impact to product, indirect impact, no impact; or product, service, non-product). Be careful when doing this. Connections may be difficult to determine.
-Create a column to note the Vendor's Development rating (4.6.2.1). Keep in mind the second note of 4.6.2.1. Some type of rating system would probably make prioritization easier.
-I might include a column to note if Regulatory agencies apply (4.6.1.2).
-I might include a column to track premium freight. You will need to track it, but you may want to do it elsewhere (ie. Cost of Quality Reporting).

Keep in mind that the intent of the QS requirement is to optimize your system needs (shorten the list to reduce costs of processing for example) and to develop a strong supplier base.

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17th November 1998, 12:43 PM
Deb Weissler
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dawn,

We treat productive and non-productive suppliers (subcontractors) differently re. evaluations. Using Kevin's format for production parts suppliers, we have developed an abbreviated method for suppliers of packaging, outside services (plating, heat treating) and outside laboratories. Here we utilize a self-survey that is then reviewed by a cross-functional team and that subcontractor is then rated according to their survey info. This is covered under a separate procedure from the one pertaining to production suppliers.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard > QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Good source for Checking and Evaluating Control Plans needed dbulak FMEA and Control Plans 4 28th October 2009 08:58 PM
Approved Subcontractor List - The standard states "other methods may be utilized" Dawn Documentation Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 8 21st June 2005 04:48 PM
Evaluating Subcontractor On-time Delivery Dawn Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 3 9th August 2004 12:38 AM
Evaluating training, needed for office personnel? Gman2 ISO 9001 - Quality Management Systems Standard 18 14th October 2003 10:05 AM
Approved Supplier List and Subcontractor Development JSmith Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 13 9th June 2003 07:29 PM



The time now is 04:39 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts