The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 8th May 2001, 04:36 PM
Reg
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Question EFQM Model vs. ISO 9001

WHY SOME ORGANISATIONS ADOPTED efqm MODEL INSTEAD OF ISO 9001?

WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCES OF ASSESSMENT ADOPTED BY EFQM MODEL AND ISO 9001?
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 3rd June 2001, 05:57 PM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is online now
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 605
Karma: 11559
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Yin Yang

I hadn't heard of the model before. I did visit www.efqm.org and looked around. I checked out the model briefly and it's pretty much the same stuff presented differently. I'm sure there are a lot of detail differences but in overview they're basically the same.

My own opinion is much of the value in either 'method' is positive and that the 'standard' is of little consequence in and of its self. To me ISO 9001 is simply good business sense. Going through implementation is the most important part - opening up the eyes to what is happening and the status of the company with respect to 'standard' good business practices.

One example of this is ISO 9001's 'Continuous Improvement' aspect. Now - there isn't a company out there that has competition which isn't continually improving. And I bet ISO auditors will have a field day with this.

It doesn't appear anyone had done an analysis (as has been done for ISO 9001 vs. Baldrige). If you end up doing one, we sure would like to know!

Sorry I can't help more.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 4th July 2001, 10:04 AM
Andy Bassett Andy Bassett is offline
An Early Cover

Registration Date: Jun 1999
Location: Donegal Ireland
 
Posts: 278
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 48
Karma: 15
Andy Bassett has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Whoa whoa whoa

How did i miss this one. Allow me to throw in a few points. The EFQM Business Excellence Model is essentially based on the USA's Malcolm Baldridge Award. It was designed to try to help European Companies bridge the competitiveness gap with the USA.

I agree with Marc that both ISO 9000:2000 (not the old model) and the Business Excellence Model are both based on sound business principles.

Business Excellence has 9 major sections, of which ISO 9000 theoretically could fit into just one section 'Processes'. This gives you an idea of the scale of the difference.

Most companies tread something of a Quality Path, starting with ISO 9000, and then EMS 14000, then TQM and probably lastly Business Excellence.

You could go direct to Business Excellence, but you would need a very open minded and forward thinking Management Team (If you can find one they are probably flying on pigs, wearing hens teeth and sweeping up rocking horse dung).

I could go on forever, let me know if you want more info, i am an Ward Assessor for Business Excellence.

Regards

------------------
Andy B
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 5th November 2006, 11:56 PM
Raffy's Avatar
Raffy Raffy is offline
Courtesy Access

Registration Date: Mar 2001
Location: Manila, Philippines
Age: 38
 
Posts: 639
Thanks Given to Others: 225
Thanked 63 Times in 49 Posts
Karma Power: 73
Karma: 1270
Raffy is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.Raffy is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.Raffy is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.Raffy is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.Raffy is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.Raffy is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.Raffy is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.Raffy is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.Raffy is appreciated, and has over 1100 Karma points.
Please Help! Re: EFQM Business Excellence Model vs. ISO 9001 vs. Baldrige Award

Hi guys,
I had some questions to ask. Would it be possible to intergrate MBQNA to ISO 9001:2000, ISO14001 and ISO18001? Would it be a Integrated Quality Manual? Where would I start? Do i have to paraphrased the three standard? Or separate manual for each?
Any feedback would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
raffy
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
MSc Research, EFQM business excellence approach used within ultra small organisations Manix Student Research Questions - Any Educational Institution 1 3rd December 2008 10:32 AM
Malcom Baldrige NQA Vs European's EFQM Model fauji Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations 4 16th April 2008 12:28 PM
European Model for Quality Excellence vs. ISO Guide 62 vs. MBNQA (Baldrige) db ISO 9001 - Quality Management Systems Standard 14 5th May 2005 12:48 PM
EFQM Business Excellence Model vs. The Malcolm Baldrige Award BrianHu Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 2 12th August 2002 10:38 AM
Baldrige Criteria for its internal Business Excellence Model - The Baldrige Dance lmfoong Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 7 5th October 2001 09:58 AM



The time now is 06:12 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts