|
|
 |
|

9th January 2001, 05:13 PM
|
|
|
Barb,
If you e-mail me I will send you a supplier Rating Form that has worked well for us.
ASD...
------------------
Al Dyer
Mngt. Rep.
ullysses3@excite.com
|

9th January 2001, 07:08 PM
|
 |
Aussie Bloke
Registration Date: Nov 1999
Location: Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Age: 47
|
|
Posts: 495
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 8 Posts
Karma Power: 51 Karma: 84 
|
|
1. Al, guess what, me too please!
2. The best supplier rating system is based on the value of kick-backs. If you don't get any, they are clearly an unsatisfactory supplier.
3. The toughy is, can you automate the supplier rating system, or are you stuck with a manual type. If manual, I'd suggest one of the many variations based on the 1-5 system. I'll pull a sample and post it tomorrow.
------------------
|

9th January 2001, 07:23 PM
|
|
|
|
David,
A copy is on its way. I agree with you that cost factors need to be taken into consideration for a total supplier system. We are currently working on revising our system to reflect this and yet keep it simple.
We are currently looking into updating our data bases to reflect cost and comminucation.
Give me a yell if you have a problem with the e-mail attachment or if you would like to see the other documents we use for supplier quality systems.
ASD...
------------------
Al Dyer
Mngt. Rep.
ullysses3@excite.com
|

2nd February 2001, 05:35 AM
|
|
|
Hi Al,
Two weeks ago our External Auditors that they found a strong observation that might create a major issue on our purchasing. And they found out that we are using the same form in evaluating our suppliers.
In view of this we have to generate a form.
Would it be possible to get a copy of the form you were telling? I am also interested in receiving a copy.
Thanks in advance.
Vash Stampede
vashstampede@hotmail.com
|

10th February 2001, 02:32 AM
|
 |
Inactive Registered Visitor
Registration Date: Feb 2001
Location: Brisbane, Qld Australia
|
|
Posts: 71
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 37 Karma: 10 
|
|
|
Hi all,
We use a system whereby we provide a number from 1-4 (4=Excellent, 3=Good, etc). These are then rated in four categories.
We also compliment this by using any evidence of supplier meetings (minutes) and Corrective Actions.
Our suppliers are assessed according to a frequency assessed by their importance to our business. For example, Level 1 are assessed every six months and are considered to pose a considerable input to our processes and therefore affect our performance to our customers. Level 2's are assessed annually and have a moderate affect on our processes. Level 3's have little or no affect on the output from our processes and are assessed every two years. (These may include Stationery suppliers for example)
We find this easy to use and keeps it all simple. Suppliers are rated first (Level 1, 2, or 3) and then the Supplier Assessment log indicates all details of assessments and frequencies.
|

26th June 2001, 04:46 PM
|
 |
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected
Registration Date: Jun 2001
Location: Markham, Ontario, Canada
Age: 46
|
|
Posts: 38
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0 Karma: 10 
|
|
Back to the original topic for a minute...
We categorize suppliers as: Level 1 for custom, and level 2 for off-the-shelf products.
We evaluate suppliers based on evidence that WE feel is important;
are they meeting our needs?
do they deliver on time?
have we had a good experience with them?
do they resolve CAR's issued by us to them in reasonable time?
are their products unique such that we must continue using them regardless of their performance?
do they provide good value for the money in terms of product and service?
does their product generate customer complaints?
Meeting your needs is very specific to each business. Only you can determine what you need. (don't let an auditor tell you any different!) Therefore in evaluating your suppliers, tailor the evaluation to your needs. If you need ISO registered suppliers, then so be it!
Beware (  ! ) that supplier review must occur at your defined intervals, and you need to stick to them.
Honestly folks, go easy on yourselves (  ) don't hog tie purchasing with space-age evaluations, but, be sure to meet the needs of your company.
Keep being Inventive.
Trakman.
|

26th June 2001, 06:29 PM
|
 |
Your Elsmar Cove Host
Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Karma Power: 605
|
|
And of course for those 'small' companies, one client system is REAL simple: http://Elsmar.com/pdf_files/ - Look for sup_eval.pdf
Do remember - Your evaluation system should be appropriate for your company and what you purchase. I even warn all clients that I have to be evalluated and on their Approved Supplier List. One registrar required the company to explain how they evaluated and rated me.
|

27th June 2001, 10:49 AM
|
|
|
|
Marc,
This is not meant to sound flip, but my answer would be "The same way I evaluated and rated you, Mr. Registrar." How you chose a consultant is a tricky thing to address. You are paying for a service that just does consulting work. The actual acceptance and implementing your consultant's recommendations is the company's responsibility. How a registrar can even question the selection of a consultant you choose to assist you in your business, is to me, "beyond his scope". If I didn't use consultants at all, there's nothing for the auditor to question, in that respect. Sounds to me like an opinion again.
energy
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|