The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 14001 and Environmental Related Standards


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 30th August 2001, 03:56 PM
goose goose is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Apr 2001
Location: nc
 
Posts: 49
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 35
Karma: 10
goose has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default System Effectiveness

How do you determine system suitability and effectiveness of a new system?

Our system is aprx 3 months old and we have just undergone Step 1 in an two Step registration process. An action item was written that "there was no objective evid. that effectiveness had been determined" even though there was documentation in our Mgt reviwed minutes that based on the results of audits the system was in its early stages of development but was effective even though there was room for improvement.

Thoughts anyone on how this can be quantified?
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 30th August 2001, 04:44 PM
Randy's Avatar
Randy Randy is offline
Super Moderator

Registration Date: Jun 1999
Location: Greenwood (Ft Smith area), Arkansas, USA
Age: 58
 
Posts: 6,224
Thanks Given to Others: 33
Thanked 1,248 Times in 807 Posts
Karma Power: 397
Karma: 11534
Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via Skype™ to Randy
Default

How have you been doing in meeting your Targets? It may be that you haven't improved upon your initial position in relation to your proposed one.

The term "effective" is abiguous and open to interpretation.

Can you show improvement? Can you prove it?

Are you complying with legal and other requirements? Can you prove it?

Are your "stakeholders informed and aware of your policy, significant aspects, your targets? Can you prove it?
__________________
None of us is as smart as all of us...Ken Blanchard
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 31st August 2001, 07:55 AM
goose goose is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Apr 2001
Location: nc
 
Posts: 49
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 35
Karma: 10
goose has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

Randy, Thanks, good points you make.
I have since learned that part of problem may have been how our Environmental Manager articulated answer to the Registrar Auditor.

Otherwise the Step 1 of the registration audit went pretty with 8 other Action request over the three days; nothing big just stuff that needs tweaking.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 2nd September 2001, 03:23 PM
senork
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi Folks:

This is my first post, so I'm just a bit nervous...however here is my best shot:

No.1: Three months is indeed a very short time for an ISO 14001 implementation. In my five years of experience with ISO 14001 (my first audit was in 1996, in South America), generally 6 months was found to be a good "minimum" time to collect data. The idea really is to work with the env. objective and targets, that is, gather hard data (kg's of waste, effluent reduction, energy saved..). The other part is to "train the troops" which is often more difficult. All of this takes time and effort.

No.2: "Effectiveness" is indeed ambiguous and often depends on auditor experience. I remember one registration that we ended up taking over because the pre-audit by another registrar had seriously offended the Q-Manager. The auditor (an apparent novice) had written up a finding that groundwater conditions had not been studied in the immediate plant area, normally a valid point but made totally superfluous by the fact that ALL of the groundwater in the area (Buenos Aires, Argentina) is a huge sewer (for more than 100 years of indiscriminate dumping in open pits).

Anyhow, that's my two cents worth. I am a contract auditor based in the Austin, TX area, pretty close to you. If you would like some personal advice, feel free to give me a call, either at (512) 837-3376 or (512) 698-7880 (cell). I also speak German and Spanish.

Regards,

Klaus
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 14001 and Environmental Related Standards

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
ISO 13485 Clause 6.3 - System to determine and provide infrastructure farina ISO 13485 - Medical Devices - Quality Management Systems 5 3rd January 2006 02:12 PM
Suitability of in-process automated inspection system - Stamping house Phil P Inspection and Test, Sampling and Related Topics 11 23rd June 2005 12:13 PM
System Efficiency vs. System Effectiveness - Definitions and Differences murali Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations 11 15th March 2005 11:16 AM
Par.5.6.1 Demonstration of suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of QMS MVladimir ISO 9001 - Quality Management Systems Standard 4 14th January 2005 02:20 PM
Hit for not reviewing System Suitability in Management Review Dawn Management Review Process 6 26th January 2000 12:29 PM



The time now is 04:55 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts