The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 14001 and Environmental Related Standards


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 2nd October 2001, 11:21 AM
Cheryl Cheryl is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ont. Cda.
Age: 50
 
Posts: 66
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 38
Karma: 12
Cheryl has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Send a message via AIM to Cheryl Send a message via Yahoo to Cheryl
Question D & D Car

Hi Guys, just finished our pre-assessment audit on EMS hich resulted in a few minor CAR's, 1 of them being Document and Data Control and I could use a little guidance please.

We have incorporated our EMS system into our current QS system to eliminate much fo the duplication such as Doc & Data and Internal Audits. We have been QS registered since 1997 and have never recevied a CAR or CI Opportunity for Doc & Data.

As I understand our External Auditor it is a requriement to show/reference a direct linkage from our Level I's to the specific Standard Job Procedures. Under our current QS system our references are generalized under our Level I's to examples such as QS-9000 Element 4.5, Level II; or Quality Level III manual; but not specific procedures. Our auditor is looking to be able to pick up our Level I's and be able to walk through our process unassisted, just by following the links clear through to the final step being record retention. In a nutshell every SJP must be linked specifically to the Level I, or be directed or linked to another SJP No SJP can exist in my manual without a linkage.

This leads me to question the validitiy of our current QS system. Do I need to now spend the next few momonths and link together all of the QS SJP (in excess of 1,000) ? or Have we perhaps been extremely fortunate with our present QS auditor or perhaps, is our EMS auditor asking for more than is really required under the standard. I would really like to hear your "best practices" how is our organization providing linkage or are you?
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 2nd October 2001, 12:21 PM
Randy's Avatar
Randy Randy is offline
Super Moderator

Registration Date: Jun 1999
Location: Greenwood (Ft Smith area), Arkansas, USA
Age: 58
 
Posts: 6,224
Thanks Given to Others: 33
Thanked 1,248 Times in 807 Posts
Karma Power: 397
Karma: 11534
Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via Skype™ to Randy
Default

I assume (that makes an A-- out of you and me) you are refering to 4.4.5 Document control. I can't find in the ISO 14001:1996 in my hot little hands the requirement you are speaking of. Check below and see if you can find it.

"4.4.5 Document Control

The organization shall establish and maintain procedures for controlling all documents required by this International Standard to ensure that

a) they can be located

b) they are periodically reviewed, revised as necessary and approved for adequacy by authorized personnel;

c) the current version of relevant documents are available at all locations where operations essential to the effective functioning of the environmental management system are performed;

d) obsolete documents are promptly removed from all points of issue and points of use, or otherwise assured against unintended use

e) any obsolete documents retained for legal and/or knowledge preservation purposes are suitably identified.

Documentation shall be legible, dated (with dates of revision) and readily identifiable, maintained in an orderly manner and retained for a specified period. Procedures and responsibilities shall be established and maintained concerning the creation and modification of the various types of document."
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 2nd October 2001, 04:36 PM
Unregistered
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Default

Unless I "blew it" I don't see the requirement. 4.4.4 EMS Documentation (a) references "describe the core elements..... and to provide direction to related documentation".

We have been thru a document review and Step 1 of Two Step Registration process and lack of linkages has not been an issue.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 2nd October 2001, 05:16 PM
Al Dyer
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Cheryl,

QS-9000 4.2.1 addresses the need for the quality manual (policy) to include or make reference to quality system procedures.

I don't know your specific document control structure so I really don't want to go into further detail yet.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 2nd October 2001, 05:40 PM
Randy's Avatar
Randy Randy is offline
Super Moderator

Registration Date: Jun 1999
Location: Greenwood (Ft Smith area), Arkansas, USA
Age: 58
 
Posts: 6,224
Thanks Given to Others: 33
Thanked 1,248 Times in 807 Posts
Karma Power: 397
Karma: 11534
Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via Skype™ to Randy
Default

Whoever unregistered is he's right on there too. A list of the required elements with the corresponding documentation meets what you need at a minimum. IMO
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 2nd October 2001, 05:50 PM
Al Dyer
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Default

Here is a sample list in Excel that you can use to document the requirements and where they are found in the quality system.
Attached Files: 1. Scan for viruses before using, 2. Please report any 'bad' files by Reporting the post it is in, 3. Use at your Own Risk.
File Type: xls document control workbook.xls (46.5 KB, 924 views)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 3rd October 2001, 10:25 AM
Cheryl Cheryl is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ont. Cda.
Age: 50
 
Posts: 66
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 38
Karma: 12
Cheryl has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Send a message via AIM to Cheryl Send a message via Yahoo to Cheryl
Default

Thanks for your input guys and the attachment Al. I guess it all comes down to "interpretation".

Q.S. 4.2.1 The quality manual shall include or make reference to the quality system procedures....
EMS 4.4.4 Provide direction to related documentation....
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 3rd October 2001, 10:52 AM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline

Registration Date: Sep 1999
Location: Oklahoma
Age: 67
 
Posts: 1,437
Thanks Given to Others: 1
Thanked 29 Times in 17 Posts
Karma Power: 90
Karma: 1020
Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.Sam is appreciated, and has over 900 Karma points.
Default

Cheryl,

Apparently this is one of those "special topics" used by the EMS auditors.
We just completed our stage 1 audit and received minors in two areas; Operational controls and D&D.

The one for D&D addressed "Linkage of procedures/work instructions. The auditor wanted to see back and forth linkage between the manual, procedures, work instructions and forms.

And yes the same criteria applies to ISO/QS, but is not as rigidly enforced.
Personally I think it is a good idea. It helps to keep track of the who, what, where, when, why and how.
__________________
Sam Goody
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 14001 and Environmental Related Standards

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
CAR (Corrective Action Request) vs. PAR (Preventive Action Request) Vic de Beer ISO 9001 - Quality Management Systems Standard 12 8th September 2009 04:38 PM
Suitable control chart to use to monitor Corrective Action Response Time data UK Steve SPC Monitoring and Statistical Analysis Techniques 2 6th July 2009 05:36 PM
Corrective and Preventive Action definitions - ISO 9001 vs. ISO 14001 Pilot Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations 31 19th March 2009 12:49 AM
Corrective Action REQUEST vs. Corrective Action REPORT Dvora Quality Management Related Issues 18 24th June 2008 04:00 PM
Evaluation of Compliance - Corrective Action - ISO 14001:2004 - 4.5.2 & 4.5.3 whalertim ISO 14001 and Environmental Related Standards 9 13th October 2005 01:46 PM



The time now is 06:26 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts