Ford, Daimler Chrysler and GM Now Require ISO 14001 Registration

[Spaceman Spiff]

Interesting point. With QS9000 going the way of ISO16949, AIAG has to justify it's existance, don't they? Let's all say it together now... QS14000!

[Marc]

Ah! QS-14000! Another automotive forum!

[dewie]

Relax....pals. Let's think like an optimist. After you pay some grand for the system, you get some cent back.

[barb butrym]

Oops...i did it again...(the 100th time this week....LOL) i wasn't complaining or venting...i was just joking around that i need to slow down...I really do...i am ready for a horse and buggy week..... Nothing to do with the standard...sorry if i sounded bitchy....

Don't apologize Barb, We all have weeks like that.
I just figured it out...if I take every class that AIAG offers (no matter what it is) I should be COMPLETELY prepared for what ever the big 3 comes up with. Or they could just combine all of the programs and call it
ISO/QS/TS 16949900012342000...whatcha think?

[Randy]

Good Lord,

All these numbers you guys keep spouting is starting to make my head spin and give me Exedrin headache #292.

I thought I had a bunch to keep up with trying to comply with 29CFR, 40CFR, 49CFR, 10CFR, 8CCR, 22CCR, Army Regulations, Post Regulations, Corporate crap, and all the other stuff in the EHS realm.

You guys got it tuff.

Just read all the comments and thought I'd throw this in: my co-workers and I have heard that Ford told its suppliers that to qualify for Q1 status, they have to be QS-9000 registered.

[Marc]

Where did you folks 'hear' this?