The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Medical Devices, Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics > Medical Device Related Standards > ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management
Forum Username


Elsmar Cove Forum Sidebar
Custom Search
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
Follow Marc & Elsmar
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed  Marc Smith's Google+ Page  Marc Smith's Linked In Page   Marc Smith's Elsmar Cove YouTube Page  Marc Smith's Facebook Page
Elsmar Cove Groups
Elsmar Cove Google+ Group  Elsmar Cove LinkedIn Group  Elsmar Cove Facebook Group
Sponsor Links







Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access
Sponsored Links
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's
International Quality Services

Atul's
Symphony Technologies

Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting

Bob Doering's
Correct SPC - Precision Machining


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


Related Topic Tags
fmea - failure modes and effects analysis, user risk
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 5th April 2010, 01:59 PM
jtavares jtavares is offline
Shy Poster (1 to 5 Posts)

 
Registration Date: Aug 2009
Location: Canada
 
Posts: 4
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 16
Karma: 10
jtavares has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Please Help! FMEA Evaluation of "User Risk" - Wording FMEA 3rd party advisors

I am in need of a bit of help on how one would word in a FMEA evaluation of "user risk" by using a third party and then mitigation of it by using a third party and the 3rd party is also the inventor. So he is qualified to advise us on how to use the product and the risks and mitigating those risks but he is external and NOT ISO certified.

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 6th April 2010, 11:47 AM
Marcelo Antunes's Avatar
Marcelo Antunes Marcelo Antunes is offline
Addicted to standards

 
Registration Date: Mar 2006
Location: São Paulo, SP, Brazil
 
Posts: 1,977
Thanks Given to Others: 286
Thanked 1,480 Times in 800 Posts
Karma Power: 248
Karma: 10972
Marcelo Antunes is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marcelo Antunes is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marcelo Antunes is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marcelo Antunes is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marcelo Antunes is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marcelo Antunes is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marcelo Antunes is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marcelo Antunes is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marcelo Antunes is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marcelo Antunes is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marcelo Antunes is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marcelo Antunes is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marcelo Antunes is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marcelo Antunes is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marcelo Antunes is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via ICQ to Marcelo Antunes Send a message via MSN to Marcelo Antunes Send a message via Skype™ to Marcelo Antunes
Re: FMEA Evaluation of "User Risk" - Wording FMEA 3rd party advisors

I´m not sure i understand what you say, there´s too much 3 parties involved :-)

"User risks", and i understand you are talking usability here, can only me mitigated if you talk to users.

The "inventor" of the medical device surely will know hoe he envisions the device to function, but cannot know how the users will behave related to the device if there´s no user interaction in the device development.
__________________
I'm a moderator on the medical device forums, so if you need help with something, feel free to ask!
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 6th April 2010, 12:22 PM
Bev D's Avatar
Bev D Bev D is offline
Heretical Statistician

 
Registration Date: Jan 2003
Location: New England
 
Posts: 2,532
Thanks Given to Others: 991
Thanked 1,661 Times in 1,014 Posts
Karma Power: 320
Karma: 12776
Bev D is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Bev D is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Bev D is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Bev D is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Bev D is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Bev D is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Bev D is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Bev D is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Bev D is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Bev D is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Bev D is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Re: FMEA Evaluation of "User Risk" - Wording FMEA 3rd party advisors

yes please clarify your question, it is bit cryptic
__________________
Statistics without physics is gambling; Physics without statistics is psychics
  #4  
Old 7th April 2010, 05:32 AM
Martin IT Martin IT is offline
Involved in Discussions

 
Registration Date: Oct 2009
Location: Italy
Age: 35
 
Posts: 104
Thanks Given to Others: 32
Thanked 64 Times in 36 Posts
Karma Power: 25
Karma: 384
Martin IT is appreciated, and has over 300 Karma points.Martin IT is appreciated, and has over 300 Karma points.Martin IT is appreciated, and has over 300 Karma points.Martin IT is appreciated, and has over 300 Karma points.
Re: FMEA Evaluation of "User Risk" - Wording FMEA 3rd party advisors

The first step to mitigate the users' risk is to know how they use the medical
device.
Try to use the report done by the product specialists of your company, they usually are the ones that have an overview of the users. Another way could be the analisys of the service reports, often they are plenty of uncorrect using and behind an uncorrect using there is a possible hazard.
Thanks to Martin IT for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Medical Devices, Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics > Medical Device Related Standards > ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management

Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?


Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
FMEA "Types" - ISO 14971 (Medical Devices - Application of Risk Management) jampot ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 7 19th December 2007 05:41 AM
What to include in a "Risk management/FMEA" process brutas FMEA and Control Plans 3 8th May 2007 03:21 PM
FMEA 3rd edition - FMEA is required only for high risk operations? Andrews FMEA and Control Plans 7 24th March 2006 01:20 PM
"LEAD AUDITOR" terminology - 3rd Party Auditors can't make up their minds xfngrs ISO 19011 *and* ALL other Auditing Discussions 19 30th June 2004 10:46 AM
FMEA and "continuous improvement" - Simple electronic FMEA database Mikey Boy FMEA and Control Plans 3 17th November 2000 12:27 AM



The time now is 06:53 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


   


Marc Timothy Smith - Elsmar.com
8466 LeSourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929
513 341-6272