|
|
 |
|

15th January 2002, 04:28 PM
|
|
Inactive Registered Visitor
Registration Date: Jan 2002
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
Age: 52
|
|
Posts: 4
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 32 Karma: 10 
|
|
Internal Audits - Can we to perform audit just using process maps?
If ISO 9001:2000 require at least 6 documented procedures for QMS. Can we to perform audit just using process maps ( flow chart) as work instruction or QAP?
|

15th January 2002, 04:40 PM
|
 |
Forum Moderator
Registration Date: Mar 2000
Location: MID-WEST USA
|
|
Posts: 486
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Karma Power: 51 Karma: 114  
|
|
I wouldnt know why you could not do it that way
BUT what rumors I have heard explain that even auditing methods will be changing....
What external auditors do now is "compare actions to standards requirements." Internal auditors compare actions to written procedures... and verify they are yes/no being satisfied.
The "new look approach" to auditing (big guess here ) is that effectivness of what the standards require or effectivness of what the proceedures are asking for will be the major consideration. NOT necessarily - are the same words used in the standards - used in the procedures - but is the intent of an effective outcome as esxplained in the standards being accomplished.
__________________
Regards
Jim
"Chance is a word void of sense; nothing can exist without a cause."
Voltaire
|

16th January 2002, 06:20 AM
|
 |
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
|
|
Posts: 1,643
Thanks Given to Others: 10
Thanked 63 Times in 44 Posts
Karma Power: 80
|
|
Compliance vs Effectiveness
Its true that the traditional 'compliance' only auditing is considered to be a thing of the past. The requirement to audit effectiveness is now emphasised in ISO9001:2000, although it did exist in the 1994 version. Compliance auditing will still be an important element of the audit process, but blindly quoting non-compliance or compliance where the actual activity is effective or ineffective will hopefully die.
Auditing should now look at the process, consider the inputs, outputs, mechanisms and controls. A written procedure or a flow diagram might be one method of control - what the auditor must satisfy himself with is 'are the controls adequate so that the process performs effectively', clearly looking at the output of the process will be a major part of this assessment.
|

16th January 2002, 06:24 AM
|
 |
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
|
|
Posts: 1,643
Thanks Given to Others: 10
Thanked 63 Times in 44 Posts
Karma Power: 80
|
|
P.S.
As a P.S. to the last post...
ISO9001:2000 now also explicitly states that audits are undertaken against the requirements of the standard. This was always considered 'best practice', and is the method taught by accredited audit training bodies.
So primarily your audit needs to address compliance with ISO9001:2000, therefore without a procedure or flow diagram there is still plenty to audit against.
|

16th January 2002, 08:40 AM
|
|
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Sep 2001
Location: Southern Indiana
Age: 47
|
|
Posts: 941
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 29 Times in 25 Posts
Karma Power: 65
|
|
Please remember that as flow charting is simple and may be easier to comprehend,however you will more than likely need to also supplement with words. Anything you write(flow chart) for you QMS must be understandable by your people who use it. Do not write(flow chart) for the registrar/auditors. Make a value added QMS for your users of the QMS .
|

16th January 2002, 09:08 AM
|
|
Inactive Registered Visitor
Registration Date: Jan 2002
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
Age: 52
|
|
Posts: 4
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 32 Karma: 10 
|
|
Thank You Sirs
I agree both as about a new audit approach as the audit having focus on the effectiveness of output, since I am with advisor hat that look at not only standard compliance but add value to client process output too.
BUT, If someone is on auditor hat, mainly registrar auditors, could miss some information in a diagram flow, as WHO, WHEN, WHERE, WHAT, WHY, HOW, not necessarily all.
And I knowing very well what is a point of view of registrar auditor, for example, some registrars auditors say that is a paradox the standard require at least six written procedures or another auditor wants quality objectives measurable for ALL FUNCTIONS within organization, I would like to remake my question as:
Does anyone have experience with registrars auditors using only diagram flow to perform process assessment and these was accept as a work instruction?
Best Regards
AURELIO
|

16th January 2002, 11:00 AM
|
 |
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
|
|
Posts: 1,643
Thanks Given to Others: 10
Thanked 63 Times in 44 Posts
Karma Power: 80
|
|
diagram flow
We have used flow diagrams for years, and have been successfully audited against them.
Your auditor should be able to accept the format of your documentation whatever it is.
|

18th January 2002, 07:50 AM
|
 |
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected
Registration Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
|
|
Posts: 61
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0 Karma: 10 
|
|
my 2 pen'orth
I've used flow charts to document procedures and had no problems with staff or auditors, in fact I find them easier to audit.
One more thing!
I was given to understand by a BSI assessor that it would be prudent for an organisation to audit the QMS by selecting one of the quality management principles and using it as a theme for the annual audit plan.
Any thoughts?
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|