The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Registrars and National / International Organizations > Registrars (Certification Bodies) and Registration


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 4.00 average. Display Modes
  #1  
Old 4th March 2002, 04:08 PM
M Greenaway's Avatar
M Greenaway M Greenaway is offline
Courtesy Access

Registration Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
 
Posts: 1,643
Thanks Given to Others: 10
Thanked 63 Times in 44 Posts
Karma Power: 80
Karma: 794
M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.
Question Do You Look at Your Registrar as a Supplier?

Does anyone out there view their registrar as a supplier ?

If so what supplier assessment do you conduct ?

I think its a great idea to go and audit your registrar - is this just stupidly asking for trouble, or could there be any real benefit (other than personal pleasure) ?
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 4th March 2002, 04:41 PM
CarolX's Avatar
CarolX CarolX is offline
Super Moderator

Registration Date: Jun 2000
Location: North of Chicago,Illinois, USA
Age: 49
 
Posts: 2,087
Thanks Given to Others: 419
Thanked 314 Times in 234 Posts
Karma Power: 176
Karma: 4810
CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.CarolX is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Spin! yes-that would be fun

Quote:
I think its a great idea to go and audit your registrar - is this just stupidly asking for trouble, or could there be any real benefit (other than personal pleasure) ?
I think it's a great idea, but not always practical. I can just see it now, telling the boss I have to make a trip east to audit our registrar- I'm sure I would get "What - are you NUTS?" To which I would just politely nod my head.

CarolX
__________________
CarolX

Theater is life, film is art, and television is furniture.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 4th March 2002, 07:19 PM
Al Dyer
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Default

The registrar supplies a service that is directly related to the quality/management system. I would surely have them on the supplier list and let them hang themselves if they don't answer you supplier questionairre or whatever tool you use to monitor suppliers.

My not so humble opinion!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 4th March 2002, 08:31 PM
energy
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs down Not good

Quote:
Originally posted by Al Dyer
The registrar supplies a service that is directly related to the quality/management system. I would surely have them on the supplier list and let them hang themselves if they don't answer you supplier questionairre or whatever tool you use to monitor suppliers.
My not so humble opinion!
They may be on your supplier's list, but to atagonize them is akin to asking a policeman to see his identification as he orders you out of your car because you're naked in a school zone! If it's the first year of a three year contract, it's akin to the above, except you are also holding hands with your cocker spaniel who is dressed up in a red babydoll nightgown. Unless, you have lots of cash to get another registrar and go for the whole certification again, be careful about beating them up like you would do to your normal suppliers. When I choose a registrar, they will be treated like a Customer, no matter who's paying. No one is squeaky clean and you may need some cooperation. You get what you give. JMHO.

Last edited by energy; 4th March 2002 at 08:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 5th March 2002, 05:02 AM
M Greenaway's Avatar
M Greenaway M Greenaway is offline
Courtesy Access

Registration Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
 
Posts: 1,643
Thanks Given to Others: 10
Thanked 63 Times in 44 Posts
Karma Power: 80
Karma: 794
M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.
Default

A relationship with your suppliers can be as productive and co-operative as the relationship you would like to have with your customers.

But yes I am sure it would be seen as antagonistic, and would probably deteriorate after a short while, even with the best intentions.

I guess it is right to treat them as a customer as they are in effect the customers representative (even if they have no idea what the customer actually wants of the product).

Still its nice to dream.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 5th March 2002, 09:21 AM
Aaron Lupo's Avatar
Aaron Lupo Aaron Lupo is offline
QA-LA

Registration Date: Jan 2000
Location: Rochester, NY
Age: 39
 
Posts: 897
Thanks Given to Others: 5
Thanked 37 Times in 30 Posts
Karma Power: 71
Karma: 722
Aaron Lupo is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Aaron Lupo is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Aaron Lupo is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Aaron Lupo is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Aaron Lupo is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Aaron Lupo is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Aaron Lupo is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.
Default

Yes, you should treat your Registrar as a supplier. You should put them through the same qualifying process you would any critical supplier. When I do certification/surveillance audits, I check to see that the registrar is on the approved supplier list, if not I let them know they should be. Should you audit them, IMHO I would say no. You are already paying enough for some of these registrars services, let them come to you. Should you interview them have them visit you, have them fill out a supplier qualification form yes! If they see it an antagonizing then I would not use them. Yes, it is a delicate relationship, but they are not special. If they screw up call them on it, they would you wouldn’t they. I let our current registrar know in no uncertain terms they are not meeting our expectations, and that I am very unhappy with their current services. Not the auditors they are sending us, but the office staff. Don’t be afraid of your registrar.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 5th March 2002, 09:56 AM
energy
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Laughing Okay!

Quote:
Originally posted by ISO GUY
Yes, you should treat your Registrar as a supplier. You should put them through the same qualifying process you would any critical supplier. When I do certification/surveillance audits, I check to see that the registrar is on the approved supplier list, if not I let them know they should be. Should you audit them, IMHO I would say no. You are already paying enough for some of these registrars services, let them come to you. Should you interview them have them visit you, have them fill out a supplier qualification form yes! If they see it an antagonizing then I would not use them. Yes, it is a delicate relationship, but they are not special. If they screw up call them on it, they would you wouldn’t they. I let our current registrar know in no uncertain terms they are not meeting our expectations, and that I am very unhappy with their current services. Not the auditors they are sending us, but the office staff. Don’t be afraid of your registrar.
You just remember that!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 5th March 2002, 10:31 AM
Aaron Lupo's Avatar
Aaron Lupo Aaron Lupo is offline
QA-LA

Registration Date: Jan 2000
Location: Rochester, NY
Age: 39
 
Posts: 897
Thanks Given to Others: 5
Thanked 37 Times in 30 Posts
Karma Power: 71
Karma: 722
Aaron Lupo is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Aaron Lupo is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Aaron Lupo is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Aaron Lupo is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Aaron Lupo is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Aaron Lupo is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.Aaron Lupo is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.
Default Re: Okay!

Quote:
Originally posted by energy

You just remember that!
Unless of course you are Energy then you should be afraid VERY AFRAID! LOL

Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Registrars and National / International Organizations > Registrars (Certification Bodies) and Registration

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Registrar Costs and fees for 2004 - Going rate range for a registrar man day morgand Registrars (Certification Bodies) and Registration 18 11th February 2009 07:26 PM
Registrar requiring sub-supplier management Mike Smith Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 12 16th January 2006 04:52 PM
Approved supplier/vendor - How do I approve my Registrar? Carl Keller Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 17 4th October 2005 03:51 PM
ANSI-RAB NAP (Registrar Accreditation Board) Registrar Suspensions Sidney Vianna ASQ, IRCA, IATF, RABQSA, and Related Organizations 117 22nd March 2005 08:02 AM



The time now is 06:47 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts