The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 14001 and Environmental Related Standards


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 13th March 2002, 01:00 PM
Luke Hannant Luke Hannant is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Mar 2002
Location: Cider Country, UK
Age: 33
 
Posts: 26
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 32
Karma: 16
Luke Hannant has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Send a message via Yahoo to Luke Hannant
Question Practical Aspect and Impact Assessment

Any tips on setting threshold values to determine if an impact is going to be significant before assigning a significance score (I take it this is better known as the Thumbs Up/Down Approach???

I am currently implementing ISO 14001 in a paper mill. We have been recommended 400 KWhr/day as an acceptable benchmark figure to detemine if any selected process unit would be signifcant and therefore scored for Energy Use. Does anyone know of any other usefull theshold values???

-------------------------In Other Words ----------------------------

In other words I trying to get a feeling for values for water, oil, energy usage (L/day, etc), whereby I can say, such and such process unit will has a significant impact on the environment (such as in Energy and Resource Use) because it uses x,y,z above the threshold values.

From this point the impact would be deemed significant (thumbs down) and scored accordingly

Thanks for your help
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 13th March 2002, 02:29 PM
Randy's Avatar
Randy Randy is offline
Super Moderator

Registration Date: Jun 1999
Location: Greenwood (Ft Smith area), Arkansas, USA
Age: 58
 
Posts: 6,224
Thanks Given to Others: 33
Thanked 1,248 Times in 807 Posts
Karma Power: 397
Karma: 11534
Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via Skype™ to Randy
Default

OK Luke welcome to the Cove.

Don't mess with those other sites, you'll find a good network here.

As I stated in our mail, I will try to find what I can, and you can be sure the others here will provide what assistance they can also.

I would recommend that you review the archived threads, you may find something there.

Free free to jump in anywhere you want and don't be shy. Marc is providing the best source of real world info you can get.

I'll get back
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 14th March 2002, 06:20 AM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,859
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,568 Times in 1,020 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 605
Karma: 11569
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Unhappy

I can't help with respect to a paper mill personally. Sorry.
__________________
A Search is a terrible thing to waste!
One Test is Worth 1000 Expert Opinions - The plural of anecdote is not data.
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them. - Unknown
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14th March 2002, 10:26 AM
Randy's Avatar
Randy Randy is offline
Super Moderator

Registration Date: Jun 1999
Location: Greenwood (Ft Smith area), Arkansas, USA
Age: 58
 
Posts: 6,224
Thanks Given to Others: 33
Thanked 1,248 Times in 807 Posts
Karma Power: 397
Karma: 11534
Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Randy is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via Skype™ to Randy
Default

Luke alot of what you are asking for will be based on regulatory agency requirements. Those Aspects that are not governed by regulation may have some recommendations from industrial or scientific organizations. You should also investigate Best Business Practices for your type of industry. For paper one good source is Weyerhauser. Weyerhauser is leading the pack as far as I'm concerned with their EMS program.

When all else fails, set your own limits. Use sound reasoning when you do it, not arbitrary guesses. Document your methodology and then set you O&T's.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 15th March 2002, 05:25 AM
Luke Hannant Luke Hannant is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Mar 2002
Location: Cider Country, UK
Age: 33
 
Posts: 26
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 32
Karma: 16
Luke Hannant has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Send a message via Yahoo to Luke Hannant
Default

Randy,

Thanks for your help mate

I think industry best practice, will be the best starting point. If I find out any usefull threshold values, I'll post them, so that anyone else using such a bizarre assessment methology can make use of them!

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25th August 2007, 01:12 PM
Larry99 Larry99 is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Aug 2007
 
Posts: 22
Thanks Given to Others: 5
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 10
Karma: 15
Larry99 has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default Re: Practical ISO 14001 Aspect and Impact Assessment

If we consider electricity, gas and water as aspects, not significant aspects, do we still need to measure them and have objectives to control them. We cant reduce use of utilities as they are required.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 26th August 2007, 07:04 AM
Dr. L. Ramakrishnan Dr. L. Ramakrishnan is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: Apr 2004
Location: India
 
Posts: 181
Thanks Given to Others: 53
Thanked 52 Times in 36 Posts
Blog Entries: 24
Karma Power: 38
Karma: 624
Dr. L. Ramakrishnan is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.Dr. L. Ramakrishnan is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.Dr. L. Ramakrishnan is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.Dr. L. Ramakrishnan is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.Dr. L. Ramakrishnan is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.Dr. L. Ramakrishnan is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.
Default Re: Practical Aspect and Impact Assessment

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luke Hannant View Post

Any tips on setting threshold values to determine if an impact is going to be significant before assigning a significance score (I take it this is better known as the Thumbs Up/Down Approach???

I am currently implementing ISO 14001 in a paper mill. We have been recommended 400 KWhr/day as an acceptable benchmark figure to detemine if any selected process unit would be signifcant and therefore scored for Energy Use. Does anyone know of any other usefull theshold values???

-------------------------In Other Words ----------------------------

In other words I trying to get a feeling for values for water, oil, energy usage (L/day, etc), whereby I can say, such and such process unit will has a significant impact on the environment (such as in Energy and Resource Use) because it uses x,y,z above the threshold values.

From this point the impact would be deemed significant (thumbs down) and scored accordingly

Thanks for your help

Hi,

I would recommend that you see the case studies on Paper products in the WBCSD site: http://www.wbcsd.org/templates/Templ...kMenu=LeftMenu. I am sure you will have some numbers that you are looking for by searching this site further.

With best regards,

Ramakrishnan
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 27th August 2007, 05:41 PM
dhammonds dhammonds is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ohio USA
 
Posts: 42
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Karma Power: 13
Karma: 158
dhammonds is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.dhammonds is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.
Default Re: Practical ISO 14001 Aspect and Impact Assessment

Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry99 View Post

If we consider electricity, gas and water as aspects, not significant aspects, do we still need to measure them and have objectives to control them. We cant reduce use of utilities as they are required.
Some people judge utility expenses as overhead and are not controllable. However, with the proper monitoring and controls, you absolutely can reduce them. My company is in the middle of cutting all utility usages from 15-35%. If your electric bill is $20,000/month and reducing it 20%, you are saving $48,000 per year!

Don't think though utilities can't be significant however, picture water consumption in a desert area. I count my utilities usage as an aspect, and use my reductions to get noteworthy efforts.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 14001 and Environmental Related Standards

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Environmental impact and aspect for foundries rivgnesh ISO 14001 and Environmental Related Standards 10 5th November 2009 10:46 AM
Aspect & Impact Assessment For Electricity Consumption and water usage pmwong ISO 14001 and Environmental Related Standards 2 16th October 2008 06:02 AM
Do we need to have a Significant Aspect? ISO 14001 Aspects and Impacts Larry99 ISO 14001 and Environmental Related Standards 4 25th August 2007 06:44 AM
ISO 14001 Clause 3.3, 3.4 - Or, which came first, the Impact or the Aspect? jmp4429 ISO 14001 and Environmental Related Standards 6 23rd March 2005 10:02 AM
ISO 14001 Aspect and Impact Assessment - Direct and Indirect Environmental Impacts Luke Hannant ISO 14001 and Environmental Related Standards 14 27th March 2002 03:40 AM



The time now is 06:28 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts