|
|
 |
|

15th March 2002, 03:38 PM
|
|
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Mar 2001
Location: Johannesburg - South Africa
|
|
Posts: 14
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 36 Karma: 10 
|
|
What is a Service vs. What is a Product? Production and Service provision
Going through ISO 9001:2000, we read in 7.5: "Production and Service provision" and in 7.5.1: "Control of production and service provision" and then it goes on, describing the respective conditions and referring to the product (as usual), like in a) "….the product characteristics".
In the line of all the other sections and sentences, it appears that one could preferably read in both cases, “...... and Product provision”, as opposed to ".......... and Service provision" don’t you think?
What are your opinions? Was it a mistake or a deliberate sentence? In this later case, what is the rationale, when all the other sections, subsections and paragraphs refer to product (provision, monitoring, etc), and not the service (provision, monitoring, etc)?
Certainly, I am aware of the explanation given in paragraph 3 of the same document, stating that whenever the term “product” is mentioned, it can also mean “service”.
However, nowhere in that document is said that the contrary is also true, i.e., whenever you find the word service, it can also mean product!
|

17th March 2002, 02:17 PM
|
 |
Your Elsmar Cove Host
Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Karma Power: 605
|
|
Jim,
I agree with your comments 100%. BTW, you say:
> But there are three places where a record is required but
> the reference is missing!
Which/where are these?
__________________
A Search is a terrible thing to waste!
One Test is Worth 1000 Expert Opinions - The plural of anecdote is not data.
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them. - Unknown
|

17th March 2002, 02:36 PM
|
|
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Feb 2002
Location: California
|
|
Posts: 20
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 32 Karma: 15 
|
|
Missing Reference to Records
I'm curious about the hidden records too. I found:
7.3.7 Design and development changes: "Design and development changes shall be identified and records maintained..."
(I suppose one could argue that the records of the review of the changes required just after this would be also a record of the change)
and
7.6 Control of Monitoring and Measuring Devices: "The organization shall assess and record the validity of the previous measuring results.."
But I didn't find a third. All I did was search for the word "record" or "records" in the document, and looked for a reference to 4.2.4. Perhaps there's something I missed.
Also, thank you for pointing out that "These processes shall be managed by the organization in accordance with the requirements of this International Standard" is a totally redundant statement. I always laugh when I have to explain that one.
Julie
|

17th March 2002, 03:18 PM
|
 |
Your Elsmar Cove Host
Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Karma Power: 605
|
|
> In the line of all the other sections and sentences, it
> appears that one could preferably read in both cases,
> "...... and Product provision", as opposed to "..........
> and Service provision" don't you think?
A service is always a product but a product is not always a service. So I'd say yes.
> Also, thank you for pointing out that "These processes
> shall be managed by the organization in accordance with
> the requirements of this International Standard" is a
> totally redundant statement. I always laugh when I have to
> explain that one.
Me too.
__________________
A Search is a terrible thing to waste!
One Test is Worth 1000 Expert Opinions - The plural of anecdote is not data.
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them. - Unknown
|

18th March 2002, 12:05 AM
|
 |
Your Elsmar Cove Host
Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,566 Times in 1,018 Posts
Karma Power: 605
|
|
Well, yes. I believe so. This is an area where things become quite company specific, but in general the records you mention are, I believe, kept in a typical company. See http://elsmar.com/Imp/sld187.htm
Don't let the lack of a requirement in the standard seduce you into the 'only do what the standard says' trap. Look at your company, your product and your processes and determine what records are appropriate.
__________________
A Search is a terrible thing to waste!
One Test is Worth 1000 Expert Opinions - The plural of anecdote is not data.
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them. - Unknown
|

18th March 2002, 05:44 PM
|
 |
Still plugging along
Registration Date: Nov 2001
Location: Texas
|
|
Posts: 502
Thanks Given to Others: 4
Thanked 9 Times in 7 Posts
Karma Power: 44
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Henrique
Going through ISO 9001:2000, we read in 7.5: "Production and Service provision" and in 7.5.1: "Control of production and service provision" and then it goes on, describing the respective conditions and referring to the product (as usual), like in a) "….the product characteristics".
In the line of all the other sections and sentences, it appears that one could preferably read in both cases, “...... and Product provision”, as opposed to ".......... and Service provision" don’t you think?
What are your opinions? Was it a mistake or a deliberate sentence? In this later case, what is the rationale, when all the other sections, subsections and paragraphs refer to product (provision, monitoring, etc), and not the service (provision, monitoring, etc)?
Certainly, I am aware of the explanation given in paragraph 3 of the same document, stating that whenever the term “product” is mentioned, it can also mean “service”.
However, nowhere in that document is said that the contrary is also true, i.e., whenever you find the word service, it can also mean product!
|
"Service" as opposed to your "Product" (which can be a service or a product) is explained in an ISO9000 note as an activity performed at the interface with your customer and is generally intangible. ( the hotel turning down your sheets, the driving directions to the highway that the rental car company gives you, etc. )
My understanding is that when the word "service" is used, it is referring to this intangible that you provide to your customers that is not a part of the product that are supplying to them (a product that may be a service!).
To give an example of how a service company can provide "service" in addition to their service product, ...consider the washing machine repairman who gives you a quick lesson on a small maintenance issue, or who writes down the serial and model number of your machine on a magnet and sticks it in a location where you can easily read it.
|

5th November 2003, 05:25 PM
|
|
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lombard, IL
|
|
Posts: 508
Thanks Given to Others: 10
Thanked 41 Times in 24 Posts
Karma Power: 58
|
|
7.5 Production & Service Provision
I would like a definition for service. Is it only the intangible? Or is repair, or plating, or heat-treating or those non-production type operations a service provision? I would think that Service Provision would be a vocabulary term in 9000, especially when it is often an exclusion to a QMS Scope!
Thanks for the Service! (I THINK!)
Doug
|

5th November 2003, 05:52 PM
|
|
An Early 'Cover'
Registration Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Coast US
|
|
Posts: 1,773
Thanks Given to Others: 24
Thanked 51 Times in 39 Posts
Karma Power: 103
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Douglas E. Purdy
I would like a definition for service. Is it only the intangible? Or is repair, or plating, or heat-treating or those non-production type operations a service provision? I would think that Service Provision would be a vocabulary term in 9000, especially when it is often an exclusion to a QMS Scope!
Thanks for the Service! (I THINK!)
Doug
|
Good question! Well, ISO 9000-2000, section 3.4.2. covers it. They list 4 product categories, services, software, hardware, and processed materials. If something contains more than 1 of the above, pick the "dominant element". It also says "service is ... generally intangible". There is lotsa text there, and I don't have the e-copy or I would cut and paste it for you. Maybe someone else does, or, if not and you need it, I'll type it all when I have more time.
__________________
Mike S. ("Gun Nut")
And they ask me why I drink....
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|