|
|
 |
|

28th March 2002, 09:39 AM
|
|
An Original Cover!
Registration Date: Dec 1998
Location: Greenville, SC
|
|
Posts: 471
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 54 Karma: 45 
|
|
Processes in Design & Development
I see that the addition of manufacturing process design and development survived in the release of TS16949. Does anyone have ideas on how to implement this with respect to the sections in 7.3? How have you(will you) defined manufacturing process design? How have you (will you) defined process development?
|

1st April 2002, 10:41 AM
|
 |
Your Elsmar Cove Host
Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
|
|
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,567 Times in 1,019 Posts
Karma Power: 605
|
|
I think the thing here is just to loosen one's paradigm of 'Design'. It's just to say you have to have a process like the APQP process. As far as development - data / process feedback and continuous improvement is how I read it.
Thoughts from others?
|

1st April 2002, 11:25 AM
|
 |
VINI, VIDI, DORMIVI
Registration Date: Feb 2002
Location: Walled Lake, Michigan
|
|
Posts: 1,153
Thanks Given to Others: 20
Thanked 79 Times in 51 Posts
Karma Power: 84
|
|
We've taken the APQP route also. Process development comes from our Contract Review process and die line up sheets and similar commodities. Our process design takes customer requirements (material, specs, etc.) as inputs, links them to what was discussed in the process development to come up with a prototype control plan. The rest is monitoring and verification of the output.
__________________
"What this country needs is more unemployed politicians." Edward Langley
|

2nd April 2002, 12:35 AM
|
 |
Forum Administrator
Registration Date: Jul 1997
Location: Revivim, Israel
|
|
Posts: 2,412
Thanks Given to Others: 100
Thanked 448 Times in 253 Posts
Karma Power: 195
|
|
This is in fact an option in ISO9001:2000, note to 7.1
Quote:
|
NOTE 2 The organization may also apply the requirements given in 7.3 to the development of product realization processes.
|
To my mind this is just a sensible recognition by ISO of what the auto industry has been pushing.
PPAP is PART and PROCESS Approval.
The main problem in most companies is the connection between development and production, this should make the development aware of their responsibility to design a part that can be produced and ensure input of production in their process. This is the essence of APQP.
__________________
You can’t fake quality any more than you can fake a good meal.
* William S. Burroughs
|

19th September 2002, 09:17 AM
|
 |
Inactive Registered Visitor
Registration Date: Nov 2001
Location: Guelph, ON, Canada
Age: 37
|
|
Posts: 19
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 33 Karma: 10 
|
|
...development of product realization processes...
I guess another way to word this could simply be the old line "Design for Manufacturability"?
__________________
Any fact facing us is not as important as our attitude toward it, for that determines our success or failure.
Norman Vincent Peale
|

25th October 2003, 12:44 AM
|
|
Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: Jan 2001
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
|
|
Posts: 62
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 38 Karma: 10 
|
|
Mfg process design performance
Dear friends,
If anyone can help me for some example of Manufacturing Process Design Performance?
We are trying to create some. Right now, what we think about are
- Overall Equipment Effectveness
- MTBF, MTTR
- VA/VE target achivement
- % of achieving productivity target
- Lead time of issuing PPAP
But some staffs say, we should monitor our design process as
- How fast we can establish Control Plan
- How fast we can establish PFMEA
Not sure correct or enough?
Really need some samples and advice.
Regards,
QSMSO
|

26th October 2003, 10:16 PM
|
|
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Aug 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
|
|
Posts: 211
Thanks Given to Others: 2
Thanked 10 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 38
|
|
qsmso,
We are using as measurements:
1. Meeting customer cpk targets for process capability
2. Meeting our quoted cycle time (efficiency)
right now, only those 2 measures. We will probably add
3. Meeting project timeline for development/launch
I would suggest that you keep it very simple at first.
Regards,
Brad
|

27th October 2003, 07:09 AM
|
|
Involved - Posts
Registration Date: Jun 2003
Location: CHINA
|
|
Posts: 102
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Karma Power: 30 Karma: 54 
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by qsmso
Dear friends,
If anyone can help me for some example of Manufacturing Process Design Performance?
We are trying to create some. Right now, what we think about are
- Overall Equipment Effectveness
- MTBF, MTTR
- VA/VE target achivement
- % of achieving productivity target
- Lead time of issuing PPAP
But some staffs say, we should monitor our design process as
- How fast we can establish Control Plan
- How fast we can establish PFMEA
Not sure correct or enough?
Really need some samples and advice.
Regards,
QSMSO
|
Most targets you said is against quality of design process, you could also monitor the timing/cost control for each project.
say, 100% on time design, 100% cost achiving(better for lower than forecast) etc.\
I did not agree for how fast we can establish control plan etc. It's too detailed and nothing benefit for improvement of design process.
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|