The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Design and Development - Process and Product


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 28th March 2002, 09:39 AM
Roger Eastin Roger Eastin is offline
An Original Cover!

Registration Date: Dec 1998
Location: Greenville, SC
 
Posts: 471
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 54
Karma: 45
Roger Eastin has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Question Processes in Design & Development

I see that the addition of manufacturing process design and development survived in the release of TS16949. Does anyone have ideas on how to implement this with respect to the sections in 7.3? How have you(will you) defined manufacturing process design? How have you (will you) defined process development?
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 1st April 2002, 10:41 AM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is online now
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,567 Times in 1,019 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 605
Karma: 11564
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
I Say...

I think the thing here is just to loosen one's paradigm of 'Design'. It's just to say you have to have a process like the APQP process. As far as development - data / process feedback and continuous improvement is how I read it.

Thoughts from others?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 1st April 2002, 11:25 AM
Randy Stewart's Avatar
Randy Stewart Randy Stewart is offline
VINI, VIDI, DORMIVI

Registration Date: Feb 2002
Location: Walled Lake, Michigan
 
Posts: 1,153
Thanks Given to Others: 20
Thanked 79 Times in 51 Posts
Karma Power: 84
Karma: 1481
Randy Stewart is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Randy Stewart is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Randy Stewart is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Randy Stewart is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Randy Stewart is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Randy Stewart is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Randy Stewart is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Randy Stewart is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Randy Stewart is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.Randy Stewart is appreciated, and has over 1300 Karma points.
Exclamation

We've taken the APQP route also. Process development comes from our Contract Review process and die line up sheets and similar commodities. Our process design takes customer requirements (material, specs, etc.) as inputs, links them to what was discussed in the process development to come up with a prototype control plan. The rest is monitoring and verification of the output.
__________________
"What this country needs is more unemployed politicians." Edward Langley
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 2nd April 2002, 12:35 AM
Howard Atkins's Avatar
Howard Atkins Howard Atkins is offline
Forum Administrator

Registration Date: Jul 1997
Location: Revivim, Israel
 
Posts: 2,412
Thanks Given to Others: 100
Thanked 448 Times in 253 Posts
Blog Entries: 8
Karma Power: 195
Karma: 4817
Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Howard Atkins is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via Skype™ to Howard Atkins
Default

This is in fact an option in ISO9001:2000, note to 7.1
Quote:
NOTE 2 The organization may also apply the requirements given in 7.3 to the development of product realization processes.
To my mind this is just a sensible recognition by ISO of what the auto industry has been pushing.

PPAP is PART and PROCESS Approval.

The main problem in most companies is the connection between development and production, this should make the development aware of their responsibility to design a part that can be produced and ensure input of production in their process. This is the essence of APQP.
__________________
You can’t fake quality any more than you can fake a good meal.
* William S. Burroughs
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19th September 2002, 09:17 AM
Xman's Avatar
Xman Xman is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Nov 2001
Location: Guelph, ON, Canada
Age: 37
 
Posts: 19
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 33
Karma: 10
Xman has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

...development of product realization processes...

I guess another way to word this could simply be the old line "Design for Manufacturability"?
__________________
Any fact facing us is not as important as our attitude toward it, for that determines our success or failure.
Norman Vincent Peale
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25th October 2003, 12:44 AM
qsmso qsmso is offline
Involved in Discussions

Registration Date: Jan 2001
Location: Bangkok, Thailand
 
Posts: 62
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Karma Power: 38
Karma: 10
qsmso has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default Mfg process design performance

Dear friends,
If anyone can help me for some example of Manufacturing Process Design Performance?
We are trying to create some. Right now, what we think about are
- Overall Equipment Effectveness
- MTBF, MTTR
- VA/VE target achivement
- % of achieving productivity target
- Lead time of issuing PPAP

But some staffs say, we should monitor our design process as
- How fast we can establish Control Plan
- How fast we can establish PFMEA

Not sure correct or enough?
Really need some samples and advice.


Regards,
QSMSO
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 26th October 2003, 10:16 PM
bpritts bpritts is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Aug 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
 
Posts: 211
Thanks Given to Others: 2
Thanked 10 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 38
Karma: 400
bpritts is appreciated, and has over 400 Karma points.bpritts is appreciated, and has over 400 Karma points.bpritts is appreciated, and has over 400 Karma points.bpritts is appreciated, and has over 400 Karma points.
Default

qsmso,

We are using as measurements:

1. Meeting customer cpk targets for process capability
2. Meeting our quoted cycle time (efficiency)

right now, only those 2 measures. We will probably add

3. Meeting project timeline for development/launch

I would suggest that you keep it very simple at first.

Regards,

Brad
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 27th October 2003, 07:09 AM
p_tww p_tww is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Jun 2003
Location: CHINA
 
Posts: 102
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Karma Power: 30
Karma: 54
p_tww has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by qsmso

Dear friends,
If anyone can help me for some example of Manufacturing Process Design Performance?
We are trying to create some. Right now, what we think about are
- Overall Equipment Effectveness
- MTBF, MTTR
- VA/VE target achivement
- % of achieving productivity target
- Lead time of issuing PPAP

But some staffs say, we should monitor our design process as
- How fast we can establish Control Plan
- How fast we can establish PFMEA

Not sure correct or enough?
Really need some samples and advice.


Regards,
QSMSO
Most targets you said is against quality of design process, you could also monitor the timing/cost control for each project.
say, 100% on time design, 100% cost achiving(better for lower than forecast) etc.\
I did not agree for how fast we can establish control plan etc. It's too detailed and nothing benefit for improvement of design process.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Design and Development - Process and Product

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Design & Development of Professional Services - Consultants to manufacturing industry Bernie ISO 9001 - Quality Management Systems Standard 12 13th November 2009 03:14 AM
Specified stages of design and development shall be defined - TS 16949 clause 7.3.4.1 pinpin ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4 24th October 2008 12:21 PM
Determining Legal& Statutory requirements while Auditing Design & Development process juliov Design and Development - Process and Product 8 12th February 2008 06:38 PM
Design & Development Process - Graphic Design Work advice needed stephenh Design and Development - Process and Product 13 14th January 2008 08:42 PM
7.3.4.1 Design and Development Monitoring - Monitor/analyize the defined measurements Ron Mercer Design and Development - Process and Product 1 9th November 2005 08:03 PM



The time now is 09:41 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts