The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Miner's MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) Blog
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Nonconformance and Corrective Action
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

Does every Nonconformance Require a Corrective Action?

Elsmar XML RSS Feed
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Standards Organization - ISO Standards and Information

Atul's
Quality Forum Online

Howard's
International Quality Services

Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum

Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Related LinkedIn Groups

ISO 9001 for Small Businesses

ISO 9001:2015 Revision Discussions

Information Security Community

Medical Devices Group

Quality and Regulatory Network

FDA (Food and Drugs)

AS91XX Series - Tips and Advice


Related Topic Tags
corrective action (ca), corrective action request (car), nonconformances
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 4.00 average. Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 8th April 2002, 09:35 AM
KenS

 
 
Total Posts: 68
Question Does every Nonconformance Require a Corrective Action?

As part of the implementation of a Quality System in a multi million dollar company that has none, I set up a database on the Intranet to record in process discrepancies. The database is accessable by all employees and is configured to accept input from any point in the manufacturing process, from material receipt to product shipment. The operator has the ability to check a box on the input form to automatically generate a Corrective Action for review/distribution by QA. An example of an entry may be a jumper missing when trouble shooting an electrical rack. The technician will want a CAR if this is something he/she has seen before. Periodically I use Excel to review the data and identify additional entries needing CARs. In addition, this review is used to identify areas requiring training of personnel. As a result we have generated over fifty CARs and SCARs in the few months the system has been in operation.

The problem is the amount of entries, currently 497. The VP Quality (Corporate) questioned why all entries do not have a corrective action. I explained that the system was not only a Corrective Action system, but was gathering data for continuous improvement in many areas. I thought we had cleared this, but he questioned it again today, as "an ISO requirement", the result of a procedure I wrote for using the database.

My question - where does it say every discrepancy must have a written/documented corrective action?

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 8th April 2002, 10:33 AM
Randy Stewart's Avatar
Randy Stewart

 
 
Total Posts: 1,158
It doesn't Ken. It is up to you/your system to determine when it is appropriate. If you documented it in your procedure that all will have corrective action then there may be a problem. I would question the system if the amount of entries haven't generated any CARs.
IMO I would be looking at how the entries are addressed by QA etc. When they are reviewed what criteria generates the CA, is the established criteria consistently used and understood, etc. If CA isn't required is there any feedback to the operator?
It would seem you have buy in from the operators, and that isn't always easy.
Sponsored Links

  Post Number #3  
Old 8th April 2002, 10:56 AM
Claes Gefvenberg's Avatar
Claes Gefvenberg

 
 
Total Posts: 4,871
Lightbulb Definitions...

First of all, that seems like a good way to get a grip on things. I'd say you have a very potent tool there. It's obvious that you have your sights set for continual improvement.
Quote:
My question - where does it say every discrepancy must have a written/documented corrective action?
Interesting... Let's reason a bit:

So let's say a missing jumper is detected. I don't think I'm far off in guessing that some of these things are quite common, and are detected in the normal inspection in your process? That would mean that the situation is under control and just maybe it doesn't warrant a CAR, but rather continual improvement as you point out yourself. If you suddely detect a dramatic increase in some area... Now that's a different story: That should initiate a CAR, and that CAR could adress a number of entries...

"requiring training of personnel" That could be a very suitable corrective action, too...

The definition of a Corrective action is that it shall eliminate the cause of a detected nonconformity, right? And the definition of a nonconformity is that a requirements is not fulfilled. Then we come to your procedure. What does it say?

/Claes
  Post Number #4  
Old 8th April 2002, 11:08 AM
KenS

 
 
Total Posts: 68
I'm partially venting with this topic, and partially looking for input. My greatest fear is that the system will be overloaded with CARs which will defeat the value of the responses, or the techs will not see a clear result and will back off. I'm trying to find a balance and ammunition to sell it. 497 CARs in 4 months is to my mind ridiculous.

Initial operator buy in was not a problem, they were tired of complaining about the same things over and over. Once they saw one problem addressed and corrected they bought in big time.

The system collects a wide range of information on each discrepancy (drop down lists make it easy). The preliminary procedure lists criteria for a CAR, including things like time lost, repetition, input by the tech and, during the review, cost similarity to other instances.

As an example of the area of disagreement consider an electrical rack with over 1000 connecting wires. One is missing. The tech spent less than 15 minutes finding and repairing it. No damage was caused by the missing wire. On nine other tools this was not a problem. I do not consider this a candidate for a CAR, and it does not meet the criteria in the preliminary procedure. This is actually the first of several discrepancies brought to my attention by the powers above, and the first we disagreed on.

Incidentally, the procedure addresses discrepancies that are similar in nature (i.e. different jumpers missing in each of several racks) which get identified during review and addressed with a kind of global CAR, workmanship oriented.
  Post Number #5  
Old 8th April 2002, 11:31 AM
Claes Gefvenberg's Avatar
Claes Gefvenberg

 
 
Total Posts: 4,871
Lightbulb I'm with you

Quote:
I'm partially venting with this topic, and partially looking for input. My greatest fear is that the system will be overloaded with CARs which will defeat the value of the responses, or the techs will not see a clear result and will back off. I'm trying to find a balance and ammunition to sell it. 497 CARs in 4 months is to my mind ridiculous.
Yes it is. I think you have come up with a winner tool, as long as you can keep your number of CAR's on a reasonable level.

Good luck, and do let us know how it's going.

/Claes
  Post Number #6  
Old 7th May 2011, 11:53 AM
amit_rd

 
 
Total Posts: 116
Re: Does every Nonconformance Require a Corrective Action?

In my opinion, corrective actions are applicable when the correction is possible, feasible and necessary.This does not apply for all cases.
However a preventive action for all failures is a must! As you already mentioned that your focus is Continual Improvement, I think you have a good tool ..may be you can add a logic tab where it says types of NC and on selection prompts for CAR ( The criteria can be defined by you) .............. But I must appreciate with the idea of collecting all failure reports, great!
  Post Number #7  
Old 7th May 2011, 03:36 PM
sagai

 
 
Total Posts: 1,094
Re: Does every Nonconformance Require a Corrective Action?

Hi Amit,
I apologize for replying to your post, but you shall change your view.
Quote:
However a preventive action for all failures is a must!
Preventive action can defined in order to avoid the occurance of potential non conformity, so when we are talking about preventive action, the source of such action can NOT be a non conformity.
The source for preventive action is reaching a threshold level BELOW the non conformity, warning us, in case we do not act, potentially the non conformity likely to happen.
br
Sz.
Thanks to sagai for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
  Post Number #8  
Old 20th May 2011, 12:49 AM
amit_rd

 
 
Total Posts: 116
Re: Does every Nonconformance Require a Corrective Action?

I fully agree with you, I missed the word potential before failure
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Nonconformance and Corrective Action


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Corrective Action for a Recurring Nonconformance Michael_M Nonconformance and Corrective Action 16 29th January 2015 09:40 PM
Nonconformances that do not require Corrective Action Fender1 Nonconformance and Corrective Action 21 13th July 2012 06:48 AM
Non-Conformance Reports require Corrective Action? Waterjetter06 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 - Questions and Discussions 7 28th October 2009 12:35 PM
Corrective Action and Preventative Action cover Control of Nonconformance? filebase - 2007 Nonconformance and Corrective Action 13 18th July 2007 02:46 PM
Does every nonconformance require a corrective action? Wendy Nonconformance and Corrective Action 6 1st March 2001 10:11 PM



The time now is 06:02 PM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


 


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies" -- The Elsmar Cove is *Copyright Free*.
A Peachfarm LLC Internet Property