The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > General Metrology, Measurement Device, Calibration and Test Laboratories > General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

Environmental Conditions for Calibration - Temperature and Humidity


Elsmar XML RSS Feed
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links



Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Standards Organization - ISO Standards and Information

Howard's
International Quality Services

Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum

Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Related Topic Tags
calibration environmental conditions, measurement and monitoring and test devices, calibration (general topics)
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 4 votes, 4.75 average. Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 9th April 2002, 03:29 PM
paulmorrow

 
 
Total Posts: n/a
Question Environmental Conditions for Calibration - Temperature and Humidity

Are there a standard set of environmental conditions, e.g., temperature and humidity, that must be met during the calibration of standard measuring instruments [calipers, micrometers, etc.? A prospective supplier of calibration services is offering to perform such calibrations on site [to save transportation time and $] but I am concerned that the proposed location does not meet the required [?]controls.

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 9th April 2002, 04:54 PM
Ryan Wilde's Avatar
Ryan Wilde

 
 
Total Posts: 185
Standard conditions for almost all dimensional calibrations is 20C (68F). Now is where it gets tricky. To hold the uncertainties that you are looking for, temperature range varies.

In a nutshell, gauge blocks and instruments grow with temperature increases. They grow (assuming steel gauge blocks and calipers/mic spindles) at a rate of 11.5m/m/C (6.4in/in/F) about 10%.

Therefore, with each C change from 20C, we add to uncertainty of 2.3m/m (or 0.06m per 25mm). Uncertainty on a micrometer at 2.5m (0.0001") over a 25mm (1") span would dictate that you would not want to stray from 20C by more than about 5C (68F 9F). If your micrometers are less accurate, then you could stray more. If they are more accurate, then you need a tighter environment still. This is all reliant on the base uncertainty of the company calibrating your tools, because if they start high, it lessens the room for error allowable for temperature.

The biggest worry is usually rate of change, because the mass of a gauge block versus the mass of a set of calipers or micrometer spindle is a big difference. If your environment can't stay within about 2C/hour, then calibrations start really giving false measurements. If the temperature of the instrument and the temperature of the standard vary by much, errors really start adding up quickly (hence the little chunks of plastic on the micrometer are known as 'heat shields', and are meant to slow the transfer of heat from your hand to the micrometer).

Calipers are more forgiving (because of the 10:1 accuracy of a mic vs. a caliper), and you can generally get away with about 20C a ballpark.

I omitted a lot of calculations here, for brevity and sanity that some of the savvy folks reading this should pick up on, such as distributions, etc., but this is a pretty good rule of thumb for a quick environmental check.

Humidity does not effect caliper or micrometer calibration, although as a supplier, I never liked taking my blocks into an environment with >60% humidity because they rust so quickly.

Hope this helps,

Ryan

Last edited by Ryan Wilde; 9th April 2002 at 04:59 PM.
Thank You to Ryan Wilde for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Sponsored Links

  Post Number #3  
Old 10th April 2002, 02:29 AM
Atul Khandekar's Avatar
Atul Khandekar

 
 
Total Posts: 1,457
Read This! Some pointers

I can't provide as detailed and elaborate response as Ryan has done.

The two websites I can suggest are:

http://www.a2la.org/
http://www.ukas.com/
Both these have got lots of pdf documentation on various aspects of calibration lab requirements. May be you'll find something there also.
-Atul.
  Post Number #4  
Old 10th April 2002, 11:38 AM
Ken K's Avatar
Ken K

 
 
Total Posts: 410
Quote:
Humidity does not effect caliper or micrometer calibration, although as a supplier, I never liked taking my blocks into an environment with >60% humidity because they rust so quickly.

The lab which does our gage blocks and weights does so in an environment with humidity < 45%. Temperature range is
68.0 +/-1C.
  Post Number #5  
Old 10th April 2002, 02:49 PM
Ryan Wilde's Avatar
Ryan Wilde

 
 
Total Posts: 185
Quote:
Originally posted by Ken K



The lab which does our gage blocks and weights does so in an environment with humidity < 45%. Temperature range is
68.0 +/-1C.
That is actually a fairly broad temp range for a lab doing gage blocks. Even at 20C 0.25C, temperature accounted for over 50% of our uncertainty on gage blocks, even with thermal compensation. We also had problems with humidity (we spec'd 25-45% RH, and in the winter it always tried to go below 25%, which is not healthy for electronic devices such as gage block comparators).

I now rarely touch dimensional, and I work in a comfy 23 lab. Life is good.

Ryan
  Post Number #6  
Old 7th November 2003, 09:37 PM
AlbertPaglinawan

 
 
Total Posts: 33
Hello,

I would like to know what is the ideal environment in calibrating dimensional and electrical equipment. Ours is currently 21C +/- 5C and 50% +/- 10%. Now, I need to justify this figures. Where did we get these figures? What possible justifications can we give?

Thanks in advance!

cheers,
Lord Ituralde
  Post Number #7  
Old 10th November 2003, 11:59 AM
Graeme's Avatar
Graeme

 
 
Total Posts: 425
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Lord Ituralde

I would like to know what is the ideal environment in calibrating dimensional and electrical equipment. Ours is currently 21C +/- 5C and 50% +/- 10%. Now, I need to justify this figures. Where did we get these figures? What possible justifications can we give?
Here are some figures from a couple of readily available documents --
TEMPERATURE
Dimensional, Optical and Mass
NSCL: 20 C +/- 0.5 C for general calibrations

ISA: 20 C +/- 1 C overall and +/- 0.3 C at the point of measurement

All other disciplines
NCSL: 23 C +/- 2 C for general calibrations

ISA: 23 C +/- 1.5 C

RELATIVE HUMIDITY
Dimensional, Optical, Mass
NCSL: 40% +/- 5% RH at 20 C

ISA: 45% RH maximum at 20 C

All other disciplines
NCSL: 40% +/- 5% RH at 23 C

ISA: 20 - 55% RH at 23 C

Each of these recommended practices contain a lot of other information, of course. Both of them are targeted at "standards" laboratories; if you are in a company's production lab, this is the type of lab you would send your transfer standards to. In both cases, the values above are the most relaxed but still might be tighter than what you want to maintain. On the other hand, they also agree with what I remember (10 years ago) of the US Navy's requirements for general calibration labs --
Measurements using gage blocks: 20 C +/- 0.5 C and 10 - 45% RH

Other dimensional/optical/mass: 23 C +/- 3 C and 20 - 60% RH
Electrical/Electronic/RF/Microwave: 23 C +/- 5 C and 20 - 60% RH.

What you have appears to be a compromise. Do you perform all calibrations in the same aera? The temperature range means that you are giving up some accuracy capability in dimensional measurements, and the high humidity is inreasing the risk of corrosion (rust) on your standards. The only way to get better control is to divide the lab into two areas with sepatrate temperature/humidity control systems. (There may be other ways, maybe an air-conditioning engineer would know ...)


You might also want to check the NIST web site. A couple of items that may be useful are the State Weights and Measures Laboratory Handbook (NIST Handbook 143), and the Gage Block Handbook (NIST Monograph 180).

Last edited by Graeme; 10th November 2003 at 12:02 PM. Reason: corrected fumble-fingered spelling
  Post Number #8  
Old 10th November 2003, 01:24 PM
howste's Avatar
howste

 
 
Total Posts: 4,288
Reading this thread brought to mind a few questions:

1)If you calibrate all of your gages in a laboratory with a controlled environment, then use the gages in an uncontrolled environment, what kind of results do you get?

2) Does it make sense to let the standards "soak" and calibrate the equipment in the environment it will be used in?

3) Is it better to keep gages in the environment they will be used in, or in a controlled lab?
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > General Metrology, Measurement Device, Calibration and Test Laboratories > General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Buying a Temperature and Humidity Device, and Calibration DGShane AS9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 8 5th July 2011 08:43 PM
How to use temperature and humidity environmental control data? Dudes Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 18 1st March 2010 05:38 AM
Analytical Lab Environmental Condition (Temperature & Humidity Control Limit) blueicecube General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5 17th February 2010 03:51 PM
Temperature and Humidity Device Calibration - Came back as Out Of Calibration pancho-2007 General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 8 4th March 2005 02:45 PM
Laboratory Environmental Controls - Temperature and Humidity Ryan Wilde General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5 13th July 2001 08:58 AM



The time now is 09:58 PM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


 
 


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"