The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > FMEA and Control Plans


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 22nd May 2001, 10:06 AM
PRODENG
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Question Shipping by our own truck as part of an FMEA - Where FMEAs should end

We have an ongoing debate at my facility as to where our FMEAs should end. Some say it should We ship to our customer via our own truck. Should we include this as part of our FMEA? Currently our FMEAs only go up to packing...
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 22nd May 2001, 10:08 AM
PRODENG
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Oops....when I said, "Some say it should We ship to our customer via our own truck", I meant to say

"some say it should end with Shipping and other say it should end with Packaging. we ship to our customer..."

Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 22nd May 2001, 11:01 AM
Al Dyer
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Lightbulb

I would say that shipping should be considered. It is part of the process of getting your customer what they contracted to receive.

There are instances where product that is properly packaged can be damaged during transport.

MHO

ASD...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 22nd May 2001, 04:01 PM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is online now
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,564 Times in 1,017 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 604
Karma: 11549
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Yin Yang

You posted this in the QS-9000 forum.

For QS-9000 folks, shipping is required in FMEAs as is receiving.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 22nd May 2001, 04:05 PM
PRODENG
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Thanks guys. We will be adding Shipping to our FMEAs.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 23rd May 2001, 10:26 AM
tim banic
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Question

Just slightly off topic...

When writing your FMEA, do you review every step of your process?

Or do you just look at the potential Failures that could reach your customer?

Our auditor told us the 2nd way was required. Just need some clarification.

Thanks Tim
"If it moves, train it...if it doesn't move, calibrate it...if it isn't written down it never happened!"
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 23rd May 2001, 10:42 AM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is online now
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 15,857
Thanks Given to Others: 1,895
Thanked 1,564 Times in 1,017 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 604
Karma: 11549
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
Yin Yang

-> When writing your FMEA, do you review every step of your
-> process?

Yes.

-> Or do you just look at the potential Failures that could
-> reach your customer?

What about internal failures which could affect subsequent process steps?

I guess its a matter of whether you want to do a proper FMEA or if you're just trying to be compliant. However, I have never before heard of an auditor who would allow a company to only address problems which would reach the customer. This negates, to a large degree, the need to address receiving - a required part of an FMEA according to QS-9000 requirements as I understand them.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > FMEA and Control Plans

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Shipping / Receiving Forklift Truck Work Instruction TheSaeftyManager Documentation Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 6 23rd September 2008 08:02 PM
ISO 13485 Certification - No Sterilization, Packing nor Direct Shipping to End User. wrustywrench ISO 13485 - Medical Devices - Quality Management Systems 6 8th February 2008 01:23 PM
FMEA Scaling - Both D and P FMEAs' in Electronics Manufacturing qualityboi FMEA and Control Plans 2 7th January 2008 08:21 PM
Fourslide FMEA - Part Specific vs. Family Specific FMEAs paccnc FMEA and Control Plans 12 29th November 2006 03:36 AM
Truck Industry Part Submission Warrant Drew H APQP and PPAP 6 30th November 2000 10:32 AM



The time now is 09:01 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts