|
Elsmar Cove Forum Sidebar
|
|
|
|
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
|
| Monitor New Forum Posts
|
|
Follow Marc & Elsmar
|
|
|
Elsmar Cove Groups
|
|
|
Sponsor Links
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access
|
 |
|
Sponsored Links
|
|
|
|
Courtesy Quick Links
|
 Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:
Howard's International Quality Services
Atul's Symphony Technologies
Marcelo Antunes' SQR Consulting
Bob Doering's Correct SPC - Precision Machining
NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook
IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors
SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers
Quality Digest Portal
IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology
ASQ - American Society for Quality
|
|
 |

24th January 2011, 09:47 AM
|
|
Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: Nov 2005
Location: NC
|
|
Posts: 10
Thanks Given to Others: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 32 Karma: 10 
|
|
How to Capture Discrepant Material identified at Supplier in NC system
I am looking for suggestions concerning the recording of discrepant (NC) material identified by suppliers. We have a checkbox for incoming on the NC form, but it’s not really incoming since it’s already been identified by the supplier. I would like to capture it in our system, since it is still NC and upsets the process. I also want a consistent way to track and report problems for military/aerospace FAI’s, etc.
Does anyone have 2 forms and use one to send to the supplier to make requests on discrepant material? I prefer one form, but would like to hear from the forum.
Hope that makes sense.
Thanks,
Kathy
|

24th January 2011, 10:13 AM
|
 |
Cross Forum Moderator
Registration Date: May 2003
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina.
Age: 65
|
|
Posts: 13,407
Thanks Given to Others: 2,941
Thanked 4,268 Times in 3,025 Posts
Karma Power: 1428
|
|
|
Re: How to Capture Discrepant Material identified at Supplier in NC system
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Beauclan
I am looking for suggestions concerning the recording of discrepant (NC) material identified by suppliers. We have a checkbox for incoming on the NC form, but it’s not really incoming since it’s already been identified by the supplier. I would like to capture it in our system, since it is still NC and upsets the process. I also want a consistent way to track and report problems for military/aerospace FAI’s, etc.
Does anyone have 2 forms and use one to send to the supplier to make requests on discrepant material? I prefer one form, but would like to hear from the forum.
Hope that makes sense.
Thanks,
Kathy
|
I am a little confused.... If a supplier identifies nonconforming material, why would they send it to you?
Or, why would you take action since it is their responsibility?
Can you clarify?
Thanks.
Stijloor.
Last edited by Stijloor; 24th January 2011 at 10:18 AM.
|

24th January 2011, 10:25 AM
|
|
Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: Nov 2005
Location: NC
|
|
Posts: 10
Thanks Given to Others: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 32 Karma: 10 
|
|
|
Re: How to Capture Discrepant Material identified at Supplier in NC system
It might be a long-lead item or a very technical part that they want to get a deviation on.
I only want to take action to record the discrepancy and then create the chain to my supplier. The parts may be on a government contract requiring AS9102 FAI and records of nonconfomances/deviations.
Does that help?
|

24th January 2011, 11:25 AM
|
 |
Cross Forum Moderator
Registration Date: May 2003
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina.
Age: 65
|
|
Posts: 13,407
Thanks Given to Others: 2,941
Thanked 4,268 Times in 3,025 Posts
Karma Power: 1428
|
|
|
Re: How to Capture Discrepant Material identified at Supplier in NC system
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Beauclan
It might be a long-lead item or a very technical part that they want to get a deviation on.
I only want to take action to record the discrepancy and then create the chain to my supplier. The parts may be on a government contract requiring AS9102 FAI and records of nonconfomances/deviations.
Does that help?
|
Sort of... But I am not an AS expert,  so my distinguished aerospace industry colleagues here at the Cove Forums, will likely respond.
Stijloor.
|

24th January 2011, 01:14 PM
|
 |
Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: Sep 2006
Location: USA
|
|
Posts: 227
Thanks Given to Others: 64
Thanked 17 Times in 13 Posts
Karma Power: 50 Karma: 166  
|
|
|
Re: How to Capture Discrepant Material identified at Supplier in NC system
From what I have seen is that your supplier will report you the yields which will be some math of what he tried to make and what got scrapped. The NCR's are his internal records and should make it available upon your request during an investigations or may be a part of monthly/weekly review of the suppliers quality data.
hope it helps.
|

24th January 2011, 07:49 PM
|
|
Registered Visitor
Registration Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA Las Vegas, Nevada
|
|
Posts: 62
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Karma Power: 37 Karma: 48 
|
|
|
Re: How to Capture Discrepant Material identified at Supplier in NC system
On your company portal you should have a link for your suppliers to download concession form which usually called: “request for material review action so called RMRA” or “request for deviation” with description of nonconformity, corrective action, part number, description etc. As you know per AS9100 you should have a database to rate your suppliers and this would be a good place to register all RMRAs activities for each supplier. One RMRA form is good enough.
|

4th February 2011, 05:05 PM
|
 |
Quality Engineer
Registration Date: Mar 2004
Location: Iowa
Age: 45
|
|
Posts: 188
Thanks Given to Others: 38
Thanked 101 Times in 52 Posts
Karma Power: 57
|
|
|
Re: How to Capture Discrepant Material identified at Supplier in NC system
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Stijloor
I am a little confused.... If a supplier identifies nonconforming material, why would they send it to you?
Or, why would you take action since it is their responsibility?
Can you clarify?
Thanks.
Stijloor.
|
I agree. No need to track nc's that the supplier is finding and taking responsibility for. It is a good thing if they are finding the nc's on their own.
The part supply process may still be disrupted, however I would expect something like this to affect their on-time delivery %.
__________________
Andy
Do as little as possible, but that which you choose to do, do very well.
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Forum Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|