|
Elsmar Cove Forum Sidebar
|
|
|
|
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
|
| Monitor New Forum Posts
|
|
Follow Marc & Elsmar
|
|
|
Elsmar Cove Groups
|
|
|
Sponsor Links
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access
|
 |
|
Sponsored Links
|
|
|
|
Courtesy Quick Links
|
 Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:
Howard's International Quality Services
Atul's Symphony Technologies
Marcelo Antunes' SQR Consulting
Bob Doering's Correct SPC - Precision Machining
NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook
IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors
SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers
Quality Digest Portal
IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology
ASQ - American Society for Quality
|
|
 |

27th January 2011, 09:53 AM
|
|
Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: Mar 2006
Location: US/FL
|
|
Posts: 45
Thanks Given to Others: 40
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 34 Karma: 30 
|
|
Time Line for getting registered to AS9100B
Hello All,
Does anyone have a time line they can share for getting registered to AS9100B?
|

27th January 2011, 10:08 AM
|
|
Appreciated Information Resource
Registration Date: Feb 2008
Location: USA, Southern California
|
|
Posts: 1,920
Thanks Given to Others: 848
Thanked 829 Times in 568 Posts
Karma Power: 225
|
|
|
Re: Time line for 9100B
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by wooden nickle
Hello All,
Does anyone have a time line they can share for getting registered to AS9100B?
|
Do you mean the time from the start of the implementation until you are registered? Or are you talking about the time line for the transition from AS9100B to its replacement, AS9100C?
AS9100B is nearly gone. It will cease to exist after July 1st 2012, and certification bodies will not be auditing to it after July 1st 2011.
The time line for implementation to registration within a company varies widely, mostly depending on commitment, resources, and current state of anything that resembles a quality management system. In very loose terms, a company that is already disciplined with some sort of system may take six months or less, where a company that needs to fully overhaul their culture and systems may need twelve months or more.
|
|
Thanks to Big Jim for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
|
|

27th January 2011, 10:19 AM
|
|
Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: Mar 2006
Location: US/FL
|
|
Posts: 45
Thanks Given to Others: 40
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 34 Karma: 30 
|
|
|
Re: Time line for 9100B
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Big Jim
Do you mean the time from the start of the implementation until you are registered? Or are you talking about the time line for the transition from AS9100B to its replacement, AS9100C?
AS9100B is nearly gone. It will cease to exist after July 1st 2012, and certification bodies will not be auditing to it after July 1st 2011.
The time line for implementation to registration within a company varies widely, mostly depending on commitment, resources, and current state of anything that resembles a quality management system. In very loose terms, a company that is already disciplined with some sort of system may take six months or less, where a company that needs to fully overhaul their culture and systems may need twelve months or more.
|
Big Jim,
Thanks for the quick reply. We are currently registered to 9001:2008 and 13485, so this is not our first rodeo. We have been advised by our registrar to go for 9100B because it is easier and would be quicker. Baby steps, I guess. I have updated our manual to Rev C but implementation will take some time, so I am looking for some guidance.
|

27th January 2011, 11:29 AM
|
 |
It's my 1st Day
Registration Date: Oct 2009
Location: So Cal
|
|
Posts: 403
Thanks Given to Others: 51
Thanked 169 Times in 121 Posts
Karma Power: 58
|
|
|
Re: Time line for 9100B
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by wooden nickle
Big Jim,
Thanks for the quick reply. We are currently registered to 9001:2008 and 13485, so this is not our first rodeo. We have been advised by our registrar to go for 9100B because it is easier and would be quicker. Baby steps, I guess. I have updated our manual to Rev C but implementation will take some time, so I am looking for some guidance.
|
You should take a look at the intent of your CB. While they may be acting in your best interest it would also appear they are, understandably, looking at their own.
If you get certified to Rev. B, you are going to need to upgrade to Rev. C next year regardless. What that means is more cost for your organization. I would inquire about these aspects and make sure that the costs are ironed out prior to initiation.
|
|
Thank You to Jason PCSwitches for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
|
|

27th January 2011, 11:50 AM
|
 |
Super Moderator
Registration Date: May 2003
Location: Clinton Township, MI USA
Age: 44
|
|
Posts: 1,858
Thanks Given to Others: 693
Thanked 307 Times in 165 Posts
Karma Power: 234
|
|
|
Re: Time line for 9100B
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Jason PCSwitches
You should take a look at the intent of your CB. While they may be acting in your best interest it would also appear they are, understandably, looking at their own. If you get certified to Rev. B, you are going to need to upgrade to Rev. C next year regardless. What that means is more cost for your organization. I would inquire about these aspects and make sure that the costs are ironed out prior to initiation.
|
That's what I was going to say!  Or, maybe that registrar doesn't have their auditors through the transition training yet.
__________________
First thing each morning, I try on my bathing suit. Then, nothing worse can happen the rest of the day.
Last edited by Cari Spears; 28th January 2011 at 10:31 AM.
|
|
Thank You to Cari Spears for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
|
|

27th January 2011, 12:16 PM
|
 |
It's my 1st Day
Registration Date: Oct 2009
Location: So Cal
|
|
Posts: 403
Thanks Given to Others: 51
Thanked 169 Times in 121 Posts
Karma Power: 58
|
|
|
Re: Time line for 9100B
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Cari Spears
That's what I was going to say!  Or, maybe that registrar doesn't have their auditors through the transition training yet.
|
That's actually a very good point and one the OP should investigate.
|

28th January 2011, 10:08 AM
|
|
Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: Mar 2006
Location: India
|
|
Posts: 407
Thanks Given to Others: 205
Thanked 105 Times in 74 Posts
Karma Power: 72
|
|
|
Re: Time line for 9100B
At this point it would be really risky to start for Rev.B.It needs some time to complete your preparation for audit and you have to complete two phases of audits.In the process,if you miss the dead line set by IAQG,you will only get sorry & sorry from your CB.
Another point to note is the pressure the CBs going to face to complete either another round of audit in Rev.B or for transition as the dead line nears.So the CB may not be able to schedule your audit when you need it.
So my friends have correctly pointed out to go for Rev.C.Hope you have choice for CBs.
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Forum Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|