The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 3.00 average. Display Modes
  #1  
Old 8th May 2002, 09:44 AM
mcarter mcarter is offline
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected

Registration Date: May 2002
Location: Greenville, SC
Age: 58
 
Posts: 1
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0
Karma: 10
mcarter has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Let Me Help You Defining what a Posted Work Instruction is

I have organizational responsibility for Document and Data Control. Our Production Manager wants the authority to "post" information in the production area. He has done so on many occasions. I'm concerned that some of these postings are "work instructions". In fact, the PM agrees that some could be defined as such. Some are even taken directly from documented SOPs! However, they are not "controlled" with revision leves/dates, nor have they been subjected to an "approval" process.

Two questions: 1) How does your organization define a Posted Work Instruction, and 2) Do you interpret the Standard as providing an organization with the discretion and/or lattitude to authorize an individual, such as a Production Manager, to post work instructions as described?
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 8th May 2002, 10:14 AM
M Greenaway's Avatar
M Greenaway M Greenaway is offline
Courtesy Access

Registration Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
 
Posts: 1,643
Thanks Given to Others: 10
Thanked 63 Times in 44 Posts
Karma Power: 80
Karma: 794
M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.
Default

There is nothing in the standard to say a PM cant issue documents (the standard is not that specific), but like you say they must be issued under the controlled conditions required by ISO9001. The PM can operate this control himself.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 8th May 2002, 10:37 AM
Claes Gefvenberg's Avatar
Claes Gefvenberg Claes Gefvenberg is offline
Forum Administrator

Registration Date: May 2000
Location: Eskilstuna, Sweden
Age: 49
 
Posts: 3,771
Thanks Given to Others: 246
Thanked 244 Times in 172 Posts
Blog Entries: 13
Karma Power: 213
Karma: 4951
Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Claes Gefvenberg is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Lightbulb Yes, they own the written procedures

Absolutley.... Our managers are the owners of the work instructions concerning their departments. As long as they follow our procedure for control of documents, I'm all for it.

/Claes
__________________
Hanlon's Razor.
Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
User Groups: Elsmar Cove Cycling Enthusiasts Formula 1 fanatics Photo freaks Readers Corner
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 8th May 2002, 11:59 AM
barb butrym barb butrym is offline
Courtesy Access

Registration Date: Dec 1998
Location: South Central Massachusetts
 
Posts: 788
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 12 Posts
Karma Power: 63
Karma: 151
barb butrym is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.barb butrym is appreciated, and has over 100 Karma points.
Default local control

I typically recommend a part of doc control I call "local control' that allows excerpts, blow ups of an area of a drawing or diagram and posted memos, color coded assy stuff, WI or the like...to be controlled by the area supervisor etc..... i usually design a representative stamp or label for it that the controller/issuer fills in...ie the doc # and rev it was taken from ( or correct to, so if a rev changes and the info doesn't a detailed new color coded/blow up example doesn't have to be generated just a new label), who and when issued, exp date if required (not typically...but some times) and so on. detailed WI get a little closer to the normal doc control procedure with revisions. the stamp is designed for each company based on what they do......as is the verbage/rules
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 9th May 2002, 11:07 AM
Laura-2002's Avatar
Laura-2002 Laura-2002 is offline
E-Mails Invalid or Rejected

Registration Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
 
Posts: 61
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 0
Karma: 10
Laura-2002 has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

Work instructions are the responsibility of the originator as is the control.

It is up to the originator to ensure their work instructions are controlled in accordance with the data and document control procedure.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 9th May 2002, 01:10 PM
Mike S. Mike S. is offline
An Early 'Cover'

Registration Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Coast US
 
Posts: 1,773
Thanks Given to Others: 24
Thanked 51 Times in 39 Posts
Karma Power: 103
Karma: 1849
Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Mike S. is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Default

I agree that a PM or area manager, etc. can post work instructions IF they maintain the required doc. control as per your procedures. This is perhaps the ideal situation as well. However, I have found that, especially in the infancy (maybe through the adolesence!) of a QMS often times these managers will "forget" or not follow the doc. control procedures (maybe they're too busy with the "important stuff"), resulting in the predictable chaos of poor doc. control not to mention audit troubles. They often like the "freedom" /"authority" of doing it but sometimes can't play by the rules.

One option is to train them well in the proper doc. control procedures and tell them they can do it on their own as long as they play by the rules. Then, formally or informally, audit them often until you are confident they pass muster. If they drop the ball, you have two choices: Report them to their superior if you think that'll do any good (in some cultures yes, in others, no). Or, take it from them, forcing them to go through you for issuance/change control etc. More work for you, unfortunatley, but perhaps less than dealing with the chaos when they don't behave. Then, perhaps later, when the QMS is more ingrained and mature (one hopes!) maybe they can take it back and do it right.

Just one of those many cases where sometimes the ideal doesn't work in the real world, unfortunately. JMHO.

Mike S.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 9th May 2002, 03:20 PM
choices choices is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Oct 2001
Location: Seattle, WA.
 
Posts: 9
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 33
Karma: 10
choices has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default W/I, Notes etc.

Our policy is:

Anything related to "how you do your job" has to be controlled.


Below is in my W/I.

"Any individual page(s) removed from the document and placed at a site away from the controlled document shall be kept intact and controlled by the process number and revision. The person posting will document page(s) posted and their location on the front page of the controlled document. This will alert Document Control to update/ remove posted copies when changing over documents. The removed copies will be forwarded to the appropriate Engineer and the Engineer will update posted copy as deemed necessary and annotate on coversheet."

Michelle<who is the doc tech.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Work Standard / Work Instruction Template Example wanted P.Natarajan FMEA and Control Plans 3 3rd September 2009 05:54 PM
One Work Instruction or Multiple Work Instructions (WI's) necessary Jmcdonald870 ISO 10013 - Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 13 24th April 2009 08:50 AM
Humorous work instruction - Relief Station Work Instruction Crusader Funny Stuff - Jokes and Humour 6 28th October 2008 05:53 PM
What are Work Instructions for? Company Owner doesn't like Work Instruction beaser3 Documentation Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 7 4th December 2007 05:18 PM
Work Instruction - TS 16949 - Is work instruction for packing and delivery mandatory sathis ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6 31st August 2005 02:24 AM



The time now is 02:03 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts