The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 19011 and ALL Auditing Discussions > Internal Auditing


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 20th May 2002, 10:15 AM
Chris May's Avatar
Chris May Chris May is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bristol, England
Age: 54
 
Posts: 82
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 33
Karma: 10
Chris May has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Please Help! Internal Audits - System and/or Compliance Audits

I have recently "inherited" the task of scheduling and conducting our internal auditing.

A bit of background first..........

We manufacture electronic control systems for domestic central heating and hot water. Also, we manufacture meters for the utilities market.

This is achieved using cellular manufacturing and a ship to line Kanban system (no stores.......whoohooo!!)

I am just beginning on the road of 9K2K having been raised on ISO9001 '94. I have conducted audits before in a previous life, but I have a few questions.

The audit report form that I have at present has a checklist that is to be compiled prior to audit during the desktop system audit phase (does what we have documented cover the requirements).

This has a column for ref. Number (01,02..etc). The last page has a cross reference sheet to indicate which clauses of 9K2K you have covered by referering back to your ref number.

Now, due to the method of cellular manufacturing here, it appears to be more practical to audit by cell and conduct a Product / conformance audit (are we doing what we say we do).

However with cell manufacture, by looking at which clause of 9K2K I have covered, it tends to be most of them with a few obvious exceptions.

I am thinking about, maybe, identifying on the audit report whether or not the audit is a System Audit or a Compliance Audit.

System Audits would go across ALL cells checking for compliance to 9K2K and a Compliance Audit would be more product/cell based.

Can you split the audits this way ??
I realise that good auditing practice should be to verify your desktop audit against the standard but................

Has anyone got any similar stories to share

Does this make sense??

Regards,

Chris May
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 20th May 2002, 12:13 PM
M Greenaway's Avatar
M Greenaway M Greenaway is offline
Courtesy Access

Registration Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
 
Posts: 1,643
Thanks Given to Others: 10
Thanked 63 Times in 44 Posts
Karma Power: 80
Karma: 794
M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.
Default

I know where you are coming from Chris.

I have a similar problem at the company I recently joined. They traditionally audited processes for compliance to a single procedure, not the 'proper' internal systems audits.

Like you I have re-defined these traditional audits as 'process audits' (note - not process in the ISO9001:2000 sense), and will be conducting systems audits myself.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 19011 and ALL Auditing Discussions > Internal Auditing

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Internal Audits - Integrated system audits mortosb Internal Auditing 7 29th September 2008 06:44 PM
Layered Process Audits vs. Internal System Audits jkittle Process Audits and Layered Process Audits 17 9th March 2007 07:43 AM
Outsourcing Internal Audits - 60 Retail Stores - Effectiveness vs. Compliance Marc Internal Auditing 6 2nd May 2004 08:14 PM
Outsourcing Internal Audits - Hiring a contractor to plan and perform internal audits Richard K Internal Auditing 21 16th July 2001 06:47 PM
System Audits vs. Process Audits - A clear definition of the differences between each Alf Gulford Process Audits and Layered Process Audits 2 27th February 2001 04:18 PM



The time now is 01:48 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts