|
|
 |
|

5th June 2002, 09:06 AM
|
 |
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
|
|
Posts: 1,643
Thanks Given to Others: 10
Thanked 63 Times in 44 Posts
Karma Power: 80
|
|
Scheduling
Hi all
Has ISO9001:2000 made any of you guys re-think your audit schedule ?
If so - how, and if not - why not ?
|

5th June 2002, 12:57 PM
|
 |
Where's the shall?
Registration Date: Jul 2001
Location: Plymouth, MI
Age: 53
|
|
Posts: 2,202
Thanks Given to Others: 208
Thanked 166 Times in 128 Posts
Karma Power: 129
|
|
Re re-think
Martin, I'm not sure why it should. I do believe we need to re-think HOW we audit, and that might cause us to change our schedule (assuming the change to auditing by process). What are you trying to get at????
__________________
Dave B (the other Dave)
|

5th June 2002, 01:34 PM
|
|
|
Although it has not caused me to re-think the schedule, I believe that we all still have to have both system and process/product audit schedules.
The system audits of course would have less frequency than the process/product audits. Process/products are where we should put the most effort as they are generally more cost effective and provide actionable results in a timely manner.
MHO
|

5th June 2002, 01:53 PM
|
 |
QA-LA
Registration Date: Jan 2000
Location: Rochester, NY
Age: 39
|
|
Posts: 897
Thanks Given to Others: 5
Thanked 37 Times in 30 Posts
Karma Power: 71
|
|
Hmmm interesting question. Yeah with 9K2K we figure we don't need to do internal audits anymore so we have scrapped scheduling them altogether, since the company I work for is perfect and we see no value added from doing them. We called our registrar and said hey we don’t need to do internal audits, continual improvement, or have a quality manual and we gave our justification and they certified us. “Hey, nice weather we are having”.
Of course it has not caused us to re-think our audit schedule, we are still required to do them based on status and importance. I will still do they audits in a process approach as I have in the past, and the frequency will all depend on how that particular area of the company is doing. The one difference is now I can audit the QA dept. and tear them apart as long as I do not audit what I am responsible for.
you asked the question M.Greenaway, what do you say?
|

5th June 2002, 03:28 PM
|
|
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Dec 1998
Location: South Central Massachusetts
|
|
Posts: 788
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 12 Posts
Karma Power: 63 Karma: 151  
|
|
I am always rethinking the audit schedules/plans/programs...continuous improvement?
Seriously, to be effective you should always be rethinking the schedule. What works today doesn't necessarily work tomorrow, priorities change and the audit schedule needs to keep up with them.
If you are thinking of the "process approach" stuff then what needs to be addresses is how were you auditing, what was covered? Is it still effective? Does it still meet the requirements? Everyone needs to look at the facts, then adjust what doesn't make sense. For my clients, I don't need any changes...but looking at some companies I audit they need MEGA changes, some don't...but even the ones I see that need changes, always needed them...I never thought they were using the audit program to their advantage/CI...but sometimes my hands were tied by the shalls and I had to allow it.
|

5th June 2002, 03:55 PM
|
 |
Where's the shall?
Registration Date: Jul 2001
Location: Plymouth, MI
Age: 53
|
|
Posts: 2,202
Thanks Given to Others: 208
Thanked 166 Times in 128 Posts
Karma Power: 129
|
|
Quote:
|
. What works today doesn't necessarily work tomorrow, priorities change and the audit schedule needs to keep up with them.
|
Excellent Barb! I would also like to add (if I may) that even if it does work, there may be a better way tomorrow.
__________________
Dave B (the other Dave)
|

5th June 2002, 10:19 PM
|
|
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Dec 1998
Location: South Central Massachusetts
|
|
Posts: 788
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 12 Posts
Karma Power: 63 Karma: 151  
|
|
in auditing there is always a better way.....
|

6th June 2002, 09:33 AM
|
 |
Where's the shall?
Registration Date: Jul 2001
Location: Plymouth, MI
Age: 53
|
|
Posts: 2,202
Thanks Given to Others: 208
Thanked 166 Times in 128 Posts
Karma Power: 129
|
|
Better Ways
especially now that Randy has passed QMS-LA!
__________________
Dave B (the other Dave)
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|