Elsmar Cove Forum Header Graphic The Elsmar Cove Wiki Sitemap More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar Cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page
NQA-USA
NQA-USA
Miner's MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) Blog 
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 17025 - General Metrology, Measurement Device, Calibration and Test Laboratories > ISO 17025 and related Metrology Topics - Measurement Devices, Calibration and Test Laboratories
Forum Username

Wooden Line

Do basic Microscopes require Calibration per FDA and ISO 13485

Search the Elsmar Cove
Search Elsmar
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Follow Marc & Elsmar
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed  Marc Smith's Google+ Page  Marc Smith's Linked In Page   Marc Smith's Elsmar Cove YouTube Page  Marc Smith's Facebook Page  Elsmar Cove Twitter Feed
Elsmar Cove Groups
Elsmar Cove Google+ Group  Elsmar Cove LinkedIn Group  Elsmar Cove Facebook Group
Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:

Howard's
International Quality Services
Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting
Bob Doering's
Correct SPC - Precision Machining

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook
IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors
SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers
Quality Digest Portal
IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology
ASQ - American Society for Quality

Related Topic Tags
disposition of defectives, fda (food and drug administration), fda requirements, iso 13485 - medical device qms, microscopes, calibration (general topics)
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 5th May 2011, 09:00 AM
medicalcomp

 
 
Total Posts: 10
Question Do basic Microscopes require Calibration per FDA and ISO 13485

We make a medical device. per FDA and ISO 13485, can anyone tell me if we need (are required) to calibrate a basic microscope? It is used to disposition product as the acceptance criteria is a visual attribute noted/or not noted at 10 x. Thank you.

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 5th May 2011, 09:13 AM
Gert Sorensen's Avatar
Gert Sorensen

 
 
Total Posts: 1,266
Re: microscopes

I do not believe that you should worry about calibration of the microscope. You should however worry about the operators ability to set up the microscope in a correct manner - that is actually a tricky task. You may also want to get into the operators eyesight - is it OK, or do they need glasses/lenses?
Sponsored Links

  Post Number #3  
Old 5th May 2011, 09:23 AM
AnaMariaVR2's Avatar
AnaMariaVR2

 
 
Total Posts: 512
Re: microscopes

Quote:
It is used to disposition product as the acceptance criteria is a visual attribute noted/or not noted at 10 x.
The answer is yes.
Whatever your "visual attribute" is that you are verifying through the microscope needs a device that if fit for use and compliant with industry standards. Operator training goes hand in hand but operator's eyesight health (is unique & different) on top of using an optical instrument that is not properly maintained will exponentionally increase variability & inconsistency in your acceptance criteria procedure.

The instrument is used to make a decision of pass vs. fail therefore it should be reliable & reproducible. If equipment is not maintained regularly & consistently, this is a big gap in your quality system & someone will easily figure it out & find it. I look at critical steps in a process, then I look at how are these steps controlled & look deeper into those steps and go even deeper until there is a clear logical description & proof that it is followed every single time during production. If I don't see evidence of it, then it is a non-conformance & I flag it.
Basic preventive maintenance & calibration services can be scheduled from an external vendor annually, you get your paper work and then your are set.

The decision is good for your quality system and the quality of your product but a business decision as well.

Good luck!

Last edited by AnaMariaVR2; 5th May 2011 at 09:47 AM.
  Post Number #4  
Old 5th May 2011, 09:34 AM
Jim Wynne's Avatar
Jim Wynne

 
 
Total Posts: 14,077
Re: microscopes

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by medicalcomp View Post

We make a medical device. per FDA and ISO 13485, can anyone tell me if we need (are required) to calibrate a basic microscope? It is used to disposition product as the acceptance criteria is a visual attribute noted/or not noted at 10 x. Thank you.
I don't know about medical device requirements in this regard (there are two conflicting responses as I write this), but if the microscopic verification involves use of a reticle ( or what an old boss of mine used to call a "radical" ) in the microscope, I would think that calibration would be necessary.
  Post Number #5  
Old 5th May 2011, 09:46 AM
pkost

 
 
Total Posts: 597
Re: microscopes

What would happen if the attribute was observed at 11x...it may have passed if at the proper mag; similarly it may be missed if only at 9x mag.

you have to be able to demonstrate that you are getting 10x magnification (or if appropriate >10x) otherwise it could lead to an incorrect pass/fail of your product; which is bad news from the FDA's and other regulatory bodies point of view.

As pointed out, the biggest source of error is likely to be the operator, therefore you should have adequate training and frequent eye tests in place

Last edited by pkost; 5th May 2011 at 10:00 AM. Reason: clarification
  Post Number #6  
Old 5th May 2011, 10:00 AM
AnaMariaVR2's Avatar
AnaMariaVR2

 
 
Total Posts: 512
Thumbs up Re: microscopes

Any measuring instrument used to verify/accept product must be calibrated and records must be available to support the calibration.
  Post Number #7  
Old 5th May 2011, 10:01 AM
medicalcomp

 
 
Total Posts: 10
Re: Do basic Microscopes require Calibration per FDA and ISO 13485

I agree that risk of it being off and acceptance at 9 x could happen. I want it calibrated. Sometimes logic isn't enough when there is push back. But, is there something in a standard I can use? -there is an interesting change of opinion when when you point out something in a standard. It simply isn't questioned (usually). I just haven't found anything.
  Post Number #8  
Old 5th May 2011, 10:07 AM
pkost

 
 
Total Posts: 597
Re: Do basic Microscopes require Calibration per FDA and ISO 13485

further to my last post:

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by ISO 13485

7.6 Control of monitoring and measuring devices

The organization shall determine the monitoring and measurement to be undertaken and the monitoring and
measuring devices needed to provide evidence of conformity of product to determined requirements
(see 7.2.1).

The organization shall establish documented procedures to ensure that monitoring and measurement can be
carried out and are carried out in a manner that is consistent with the monitoring and measurement
requirements.

Where necessary to ensure valid results, measuring equipment shall
a) be calibrated or verified at specified intervals, or prior to use, against measurement standards traceable
to international or national measurement standards; where no such standards exist, the basis used for
calibration or verification shall be recorded;
The key thing here and I'm sure some calibration expert will jump down my neck for this: the standard does not specify how often you have to calibrate. I would have thought that the variation in a lens and the associated magnification is going to be insignificant over quite a considerable period of time. You should therefore be able to justify a really long calibration period!

edit: the second paragraph about documented procedures is specific to 13485 and not present in 9001
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > ISO (International Organization for Standardization) Standards > ISO 17025 - General Metrology, Measurement Device, Calibration and Test Laboratories > ISO 17025 and related Metrology Topics - Measurement Devices, Calibration and Test Laboratories

Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?


Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Does ISO 13485 require Gauge R&R's? trainerbob ISO 13485 and ISO 14969 - Medical Devices - Quality Management Systems 3 11th November 2011 02:01 AM
FDA vs. ISO 13485 - Are FDA Documents for Devices accepted in Europe TamTom ISO 13485 and ISO 14969 - Medical Devices - Quality Management Systems 3 10th January 2011 10:36 AM
Calibration Intervals (Frequency) for Stereoscopes, Microscopes, etc. freelovefest Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 2 12th October 2007 08:55 PM
Complying ISO 13485 - Require other documentation specified by regional regulations? Izatul ISO 13485 and ISO 14969 - Medical Devices - Quality Management Systems 5 13th March 2007 08:50 AM
Medical Device Component Suppliers - Require ISO 13485 system? Cathy ISO 13485 and ISO 14969 - Medical Devices - Quality Management Systems 10 16th April 2004 03:36 PM



The time now is 08:05 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


   


Marc Timothy Smith - Elsmar.com
8466 LeSourdsville-West Chester Road, Olde West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929
513 341-6272
NOTE: This forum uses "cookies".