The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
Miner's MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) Blog
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > General Metrology, Measurement Device, Calibration and Test Laboratories > Metrology Topics - Measurement Devices, Calibration and Test Laboratories
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

Do basic Microscopes require Calibration per FDA and ISO 13485

Elsmar XML RSS Feed
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Standards Organization - ISO Standards and Information

Atul's
Quality Forum Online

Howard's
International Quality Services

Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum

Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Related LinkedIn Groups

ISO 9001 for Small Businesses

ISO 9001:2015 Revision Discussions

Information Security Community

Medical Devices Group

Quality and Regulatory Network

FDA (Food and Drugs)

AS91XX Series - Tips and Advice


Related Topic Tags
disposition of defectives, fda (food and drug administration), fda requirements, iso 13485 - medical device qms, microscopes, calibration (general topics)
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 5th May 2011, 08:00 AM
medicalcomp

 
 
Total Posts: 10
Question Do basic Microscopes require Calibration per FDA and ISO 13485

We make a medical device. per FDA and ISO 13485, can anyone tell me if we need (are required) to calibrate a basic microscope? It is used to disposition product as the acceptance criteria is a visual attribute noted/or not noted at 10 x. Thank you.

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 5th May 2011, 08:13 AM
Gert Sorensen's Avatar
Gert Sorensen

 
 
Total Posts: 1,264
Re: microscopes

I do not believe that you should worry about calibration of the microscope. You should however worry about the operators ability to set up the microscope in a correct manner - that is actually a tricky task. You may also want to get into the operators eyesight - is it OK, or do they need glasses/lenses?
Sponsored Links

  Post Number #3  
Old 5th May 2011, 08:23 AM
AnaMariaVR2's Avatar
AnaMariaVR2

 
 
Total Posts: 512
Re: microscopes

Quote:
It is used to disposition product as the acceptance criteria is a visual attribute noted/or not noted at 10 x.
The answer is yes.
Whatever your "visual attribute" is that you are verifying through the microscope needs a device that if fit for use and compliant with industry standards. Operator training goes hand in hand but operator's eyesight health (is unique & different) on top of using an optical instrument that is not properly maintained will exponentionally increase variability & inconsistency in your acceptance criteria procedure.

The instrument is used to make a decision of pass vs. fail therefore it should be reliable & reproducible. If equipment is not maintained regularly & consistently, this is a big gap in your quality system & someone will easily figure it out & find it. I look at critical steps in a process, then I look at how are these steps controlled & look deeper into those steps and go even deeper until there is a clear logical description & proof that it is followed every single time during production. If I don't see evidence of it, then it is a non-conformance & I flag it.
Basic preventive maintenance & calibration services can be scheduled from an external vendor annually, you get your paper work and then your are set.

The decision is good for your quality system and the quality of your product but a business decision as well.

Good luck!

Last edited by AnaMariaVR2; 5th May 2011 at 08:47 AM.
  Post Number #4  
Old 5th May 2011, 08:34 AM
Jim Wynne's Avatar
Jim Wynne

 
 
Total Posts: 14,142
Re: microscopes

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by medicalcomp View Post

We make a medical device. per FDA and ISO 13485, can anyone tell me if we need (are required) to calibrate a basic microscope? It is used to disposition product as the acceptance criteria is a visual attribute noted/or not noted at 10 x. Thank you.
I don't know about medical device requirements in this regard (there are two conflicting responses as I write this), but if the microscopic verification involves use of a reticle ( or what an old boss of mine used to call a "radical" ) in the microscope, I would think that calibration would be necessary.
  Post Number #5  
Old 5th May 2011, 08:46 AM
pkost

 
 
Total Posts: 656
Re: microscopes

What would happen if the attribute was observed at 11x...it may have passed if at the proper mag; similarly it may be missed if only at 9x mag.

you have to be able to demonstrate that you are getting 10x magnification (or if appropriate >10x) otherwise it could lead to an incorrect pass/fail of your product; which is bad news from the FDA's and other regulatory bodies point of view.

As pointed out, the biggest source of error is likely to be the operator, therefore you should have adequate training and frequent eye tests in place

Last edited by pkost; 5th May 2011 at 09:00 AM. Reason: clarification
  Post Number #6  
Old 5th May 2011, 09:00 AM
AnaMariaVR2's Avatar
AnaMariaVR2

 
 
Total Posts: 512
Thumbs up Re: microscopes

Any measuring instrument used to verify/accept product must be calibrated and records must be available to support the calibration.
  Post Number #7  
Old 5th May 2011, 09:01 AM
medicalcomp

 
 
Total Posts: 10
Re: Do basic Microscopes require Calibration per FDA and ISO 13485

I agree that risk of it being off and acceptance at 9 x could happen. I want it calibrated. Sometimes logic isn't enough when there is push back. But, is there something in a standard I can use? -there is an interesting change of opinion when when you point out something in a standard. It simply isn't questioned (usually). I just haven't found anything.
  Post Number #8  
Old 5th May 2011, 09:07 AM
pkost

 
 
Total Posts: 656
Re: Do basic Microscopes require Calibration per FDA and ISO 13485

further to my last post:

Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by ISO 13485

7.6 Control of monitoring and measuring devices

The organization shall determine the monitoring and measurement to be undertaken and the monitoring and
measuring devices needed to provide evidence of conformity of product to determined requirements
(see 7.2.1).

The organization shall establish documented procedures to ensure that monitoring and measurement can be
carried out and are carried out in a manner that is consistent with the monitoring and measurement
requirements.

Where necessary to ensure valid results, measuring equipment shall
a) be calibrated or verified at specified intervals, or prior to use, against measurement standards traceable
to international or national measurement standards; where no such standards exist, the basis used for
calibration or verification shall be recorded;
The key thing here and I'm sure some calibration expert will jump down my neck for this: the standard does not specify how often you have to calibrate. I would have thought that the variation in a lens and the associated magnification is going to be insignificant over quite a considerable period of time. You should therefore be able to justify a really long calibration period!

edit: the second paragraph about documented procedures is specific to 13485 and not present in 9001
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > General Metrology, Measurement Device, Calibration and Test Laboratories > Metrology Topics - Measurement Devices, Calibration and Test Laboratories


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Basic ISO 13485 Training Material Aphel ISO 13485 and ISO 14969 - Medical Devices - Quality Management Systems 5 28th October 2014 12:56 PM
ISO 13485 & FDA Requirements - What kinds of software require validation? Fralem ISO 13485 and ISO 14969 - Medical Devices - Quality Management Systems 2 11th January 2012 07:16 PM
Does ISO 13485 require Gauge R&R's? trainerbob ISO 13485 and ISO 14969 - Medical Devices - Quality Management Systems 3 11th November 2011 02:01 AM
Calibration Intervals (Frequency) for Stereoscopes, Microscopes, etc. freelovefest Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 2 12th October 2007 07:55 PM
Complying ISO 13485 - Require other documentation specified by regional regulations? Izatul ISO 13485 and ISO 14969 - Medical Devices - Quality Management Systems 5 13th March 2007 07:50 AM



The time now is 05:03 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


 


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies" -- The Elsmar Cove is *Copyright Free*.
A Peachfarm LLC Internet Property