|
Elsmar Cove Forum Sidebar
|
|
|
|
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
|
| Monitor New Forum Posts
|
|
Follow Marc & Elsmar
|
|
|
Elsmar Cove Groups
|
|
|
Sponsor Links
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access
|
 |
|
Sponsored Links
|
|
|
|
Courtesy Quick Links
|
 Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:
Howard's International Quality Services
Atul's Symphony Technologies
Marcelo Antunes' SQR Consulting
Bob Doering's Correct SPC - Precision Machining
NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook
IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors
SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers
Quality Digest Portal
IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology
ASQ - American Society for Quality
|
|
 |

19th May 2011, 04:09 AM
|
|
Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: Mar 2011
Location: China
|
|
Posts: 56
Thanks Given to Others: 15
Thanked 21 Times in 17 Posts
Karma Power: 14 Karma: 115  
|
|
How to understand the "full scale peak-to-valley output" mentioned in IEC 60601-2-27
Dear everybody
Currently, i am conducting tests per IEC 60601-2-27. In clause 50, many subclause mentioned the term "full scale peak-to-valley output" .
ie, about the accuracy of signal reproduction test,the standard says "Adjust the SENSITIVITY of the EQUIPMENT to 10 mm/mV. Adjust the signal generator to produce a peak-to-valley output on a display device that is 10 % of the full scale peak-tovalley output. Increase the output of the signal generator by factors of 2, 5 and 10. The displayed output shall be linear within ± 20 % of the full scale output."
How can i understand the highlighted term, does it mean the channel width or the 10 mm due to the sensitivity.
thaks in advance!
|

22nd May 2011, 09:50 PM
|
|
Appreciated Information Resource
Registration Date: Oct 2009
Location: Japan / Ise
|
|
Posts: 629
Thanks Given to Others: 35
Thanked 474 Times in 324 Posts
Karma Power: 86
|
|
|
Re: How to understand the "full scale peak-to-valley output" mentioned in IEC 60601-2
For a printer strip that has for example 50mm, this would mean a signal that is approximately 5mV peak to peak (+2.5mV / -2.5mV). I say approximate, as most systems will have small sensitivity errors, so the standard usually wants you to adjust the source to give exactly full scale.
On a screen this may be more difficult to define the boundaries of "full scale", as some manufacturers allow the signal to drift well beyond the allocated space. But the designers of the screen layout should be able to indicate what they consider to be "full scale", e.g. point at which two adjacent signals will not overlap. This would be the channel width as you say.
On a related point, the new edition just published (IEC 60601-2-27:2011) has fixed many of the errors in the 2005 edition.
So for example, the 2005 edition says start at 10% of full scale, and increase to 20%, 50% and 100% which makes no sense from a laboratory point of view, because at 10% the resolution is too small.
The 2011 edition says start at 100% full scale, then reduce 50%, 20% and 10% which makes much more sense. Another example is the multichannel cross talk test which is now clearly defined where to apply the signal and where to verify the result.
|

22nd May 2011, 11:13 PM
|
|
Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: Mar 2011
Location: China
|
|
Posts: 56
Thanks Given to Others: 15
Thanked 21 Times in 17 Posts
Karma Power: 14 Karma: 115  
|
|
|
Re: How to understand the "full scale peak-to-valley output" mentioned in IEC 60601-2
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by Peter Selvey
For a printer strip that has for example 50mm, this would mean a signal that is approximately 5mV peak to peak (+2.5mV / -2.5mV). I say approximate, as most systems will have small sensitivity errors, so the standard usually wants you to adjust the source to give exactly full scale.
On a screen this may be more difficult to define the boundaries of "full scale", as some manufacturers allow the signal to drift well beyond the allocated space. But the designers of the screen layout should be able to indicate what they consider to be "full scale", e.g. point at which two adjacent signals will not overlap. This would be the channel width as you say.
On a related point, the new edition just published (IEC 60601-2-27:2011) has fixed many of the errors in the 2005 edition.
So for example, the 2005 edition says start at 10% of full scale, and increase to 20%, 50% and 100% which makes no sense from a laboratory point of view, because at 10% the resolution is too small.
The 2011 edition says start at 100% full scale, then reduce 50%, 20% and 10% which makes much more sense. Another example is the multichannel cross talk test which is now clearly defined where to apply the signal and where to verify the result.
|
thank you for your detailded interpretation.
but i am still a little intangible.
On a screen, the "full scale" is the maximum scale designed by the manufacturer or the actual scale measured by us.
for example, the maximum scale designed by manufacturer is 30 mm (channel width) but the actual scale measured by us may be larger than that.
so, which is the full scale, the former or the latter?
|

22nd May 2011, 11:50 PM
|
|
Appreciated Information Resource
Registration Date: Oct 2009
Location: Japan / Ise
|
|
Posts: 629
Thanks Given to Others: 35
Thanked 474 Times in 324 Posts
Karma Power: 86
|
|
|
Re: How to understand the "full scale peak-to-valley output" mentioned in IEC 60601-2
I would use the scale designated by the manufacturer.
For patient monitors, the manufacturer may allow the ECG signal to go beyond the channel so the user can still see the signal in case of overload or other problems with the baseline (e.g. poor electrode contact).
However, I don't think it is resononable to worry about accuracy and sensitivity in these cases. It is just a kind of user trouble shooting feature.
If the manufacturer says 30mm then test for 30mm.
|
|
Thanks to Peter Selvey for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
|
|

23rd May 2011, 05:42 AM
|
|
Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: Mar 2011
Location: China
|
|
Posts: 56
Thanks Given to Others: 15
Thanked 21 Times in 17 Posts
Karma Power: 14 Karma: 115  
|
|
|
Re: How to understand the "full scale peak-to-valley output" mentioned in IEC 60601-2
thank you
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Forum Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|