The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Information Resources - Papers - Articles - Etc. > Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notices


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Thread Tags
Tag Cloud
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 31st July 2001, 06:00 PM
vshields vshields is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Nov 2000
Location: Indpls, In. USA
 
Posts: 9
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 38
Karma: 10
vshields has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Question OEM - Definition of OEM - Original Equipment Manufacturer

I would like to discuss the definition of OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer. Marc, you have stated that as far as QS 9000 that you feel that it pertains only to Ford,GM and DC. I disagree, read the (note) in section 4.11.2.b.1. " Where a qualified laboratory does not exist for a given piece of equipment, calibration services may be performed by the original equipment manufacturer" Now are you saying that the big three wants us to send our special piece of equipment to them for calibration. I don't think so. I think that they are talking about the company that designed, built, and produced this piece of equipment. If my company produces hubcaps, and we have a patent, we are the OEM. If the big three buys them from us, and puts them on their cars, then we are the 1st tier supplier but also the OEM, which gives us the freedom to audit our own subcontracters and qualify them. If however we are contracted by the big three to paint hubcaps,that they have already bought from some other OEM, then the supplier of the paint, to us must be 3rd party registered. What do you think???
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 31st July 2001, 08:14 PM
Al Dyer
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
I need more convincing before I would give up the thought that under QS-9000 the big 3 are the OEM's.

ASD...
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 1st August 2001, 09:45 AM
Jim Evans
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
In QS-9000 Appendix E: Acronyms and Their Meanings, OEM is defined as:

Original Equipment Manufacturer (e.g. Chrysler, Ford, General Motors).

Jim

[This message has been edited by Jim Evans (edited 01 August 2001).]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 1st August 2001, 12:58 PM
vshields vshields is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Nov 2000
Location: Indpls, In. USA
 
Posts: 9
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 38
Karma: 10
vshields has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Out of all the acronyms given on that page (e.g.)is only used once, websters dictionary says it stands for (for the sake of example) to me this means others could exist. Since the big three wrote the book it only stands to reason that they would use their
own company names as the example.I feel they are giving an example, not saying we are the only OEM's out there.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 1st August 2001, 05:09 PM
Jim Evans
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Try this one: QS-9000 Section II -- Title page under Section Organization:
Chrysler-Specific Requirements
Ford-Specific Requirements
General Motors-Specific Requirements
Other OEM-Specific Requirements

There is a short list of other companies (mostly truck manufacturers) in that section such as Mack Truck, Volvo Truck etc.

The implication seems to be that the authors of QS-9000 (namely the Big 3) consider themselves and a few select other vehicle manufacturers as the only OEMs.

Jim
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 1st August 2001, 06:42 PM
Al Dyer
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs up

Jim,

Good references. Any "Big 3" SQA's lurking out there to shed some light, although I think the correct anwsers have been posted already.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 2nd August 2001, 09:25 AM
Jim Evans
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Thanks Al. The big 3 could have saved us all some grief by including a definition of OEM in the QS glossary. Their failure to include it in the glossary would seem to imply that they felt the definition of OEM was sufficiently clear in the text of the QS document itself. Just my opinion.

Jim
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 2nd August 2001, 09:39 AM
Marc's Avatar
Marc Marc is offline
Your Elsmar Cove Host

Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester, Ohio - USA
Age: 59
 
Posts: 16,390
Thanks Given to Others: 2,170
Thanked 1,781 Times in 1,152 Posts
Blog Entries: 4
Karma Power: 637
Karma: 12634
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.Marc is appreciated, and has over 1700 Karma points.
Send a message via AIM to Marc Send a message via Skype™ to Marc
I Say...

-> The big 3 could have saved us all some grief by including
-> a definition of OEM in the QS glossary.

Next thing you know, you'll be wanting 'sanctioned' interpretations or something!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Information Resources - Papers - Articles - Etc. > Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations

Bookmarks

Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
The relationship between OEM and the subcontracted manufacturer celia4237 Medical Devices (21 CFR part 820) 1 13th October 2009 10:06 AM
OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) - Exact definition of OEM Sanne Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations 9 5th May 2008 01:06 PM
Is TS16949 Only for OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) Customers? mazura ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard 8 30th August 2006 06:35 PM
Honda - What's different from US OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) requirements? bpritts Customer and Company Specific Requirements 4 15th December 2004 02:28 PM
In-House Calibration vs. OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) Calibration Vash Stampede ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories 2 8th November 2000 10:55 AM



The time now is 11:26 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

If you are having problems Registering, Activating your Registration, or other problems, you can phone me in the US. I'm not here 24/7/365, but if I'm here I'll try to help.
The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts