The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc.


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 1st July 2002, 12:48 AM
rikkyyee
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Please Help! Cpk calculation for short runs - Manufacturing FFC (flexible flat cable)

Anybody can advise

In our production we are manufacturing FFC (flexible flat cable) The product life cycle for a model is very short due a lot that contain 2000-4000pcs can be finished within 1 hour. everyday a prodcution line (total of 4) are schedule to run minimun 5 to 6 models, each model may only run a day only and may need to wait a week or a month later to run again. Hence the production is almost running dilferent model from day to day.

due to customer request only Cpk data the management are also only concern about it.

our current method are randomly select a model/line in a week and get 30 sample/lot to calculate the Cpk data. and we will use it as a reference for that week Cpk reference for all model.

this method not working very well because the Cpk data keep fluctuating from week to week.

pls give some advise
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 1st July 2002, 07:49 AM
Al Dyer
Unregistered Guest

 
Posts: n/a
Lightbulb

Cpk values will fluctuate no matter the sample size. Try increasing your sample size and see of the fluctuation between the samples is consistant.

I think the main concern would be the trends in the Cpk values. Possibly set a target Cpk and react when the trend indicates you are running close to or below the target.

Also consider the variables when reviewing Cpk:

Time
Shift
Operator
Setup
Maintenance
Material

etc......
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 1st July 2002, 08:13 AM
Dave W Dave W is offline
Inactive Registered Visitor

Registration Date: Aug 2001
Location: Bristol, England
Age: 42
 
Posts: 24
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 34
Karma: 20
Dave W has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

Rikkyyee

Al is right,

There are 'confidence limits' for cpk. The larger the number of samples, the more confident you can be that the cpk value is actually correct (as you have captured more variation).
30 is actually quite a small number. For example, to guarantee that your cpk is actually 1.33 or above, you need to have calculated a cpk of 1.62 for your batch of 30. With 100 samples, this number drops to 1.47.
You should not be surprised if your calculated cpk values vary with 30 samples.

The other question is: are you confident that the same process variation affects all of your product groups in the same way?

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14th September 2002, 03:30 PM
Ravi Khare's Avatar
Ravi Khare Ravi Khare is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pune, India
Age: 48
 
Posts: 70
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Karma Power: 35
Karma: 58
Ravi Khare has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

Thomas Pyzdek has described methods of Short Run SPC in his Six Sigma Handbook...just may prove useful.

He advises to focus on the process than the small/ short batch that gets over before you can start looking for samples. The process focus could consolidate together batches of different products passing through the same process.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc.

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Cpk Calculation - Tolerance to maintain 1.33 & 1.67 Cpk respectively gianni Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. 20 24th July 2009 11:23 AM
Short Runs and Control Charts trainee SPC Monitoring and Statistical Analysis Techniques 3 6th February 2007 04:53 PM
PAPP on very short runs of very low volumes ( < 50) rrofkar APQP and PPAP 3 16th November 2006 04:19 PM
Precontrol and Process Capability - CNC Lathes that run small batches - Short Runs Steven Sulkin SPC Monitoring and Statistical Analysis Techniques 12 9th December 2002 02:36 PM
Short Run - Low Volume Cpk Calculation tohbin Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Process, Machine, etc. 10 20th February 2002 05:28 PM



The time now is 06:56 PM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts