|
Elsmar Cove Forum Sidebar
|
|
|
|
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
|
| Monitor New Forum Posts
|
|
Follow Marc & Elsmar
|
|
|
Elsmar Cove Groups
|
|
|
Sponsor Links
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access
|
 |
|
Sponsored Links
|
|
|
|
Courtesy Quick Links
|
 Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:
Howard's International Quality Services
Atul's Symphony Technologies
Marcelo Antunes' SQR Consulting
Bob Doering's Correct SPC - Precision Machining
NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook
IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors
SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers
Quality Digest Portal
IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology
ASQ - American Society for Quality
|
|
 |

21st July 2011, 09:48 AM
|
 |
Shy Poster (1 to 5 Posts)
Registration Date: Aug 2008
Location: Melbourne Florida
|
|
Posts: 5
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 20 Karma: 10 
|
|
Assistance with a Cable Issue
We have recently encountered an issue with M17/113-RG316 cable in which the braid wire strands are displaying what appears to be corrosion. The substance identified appears in varying colors and color combination's (green, red, black). Our analysis has identified that all of the affected cable contains braid wire damage (exposed copper areas) and, in some cases, areas of plating that are less than the Mil-Spec requirements. We have spoken to the cable manufacturers and have been told that the Mil-Spec plating requirements for the braid wire are (per industry standard) considered pre-processing requirements. Does anyone have any experience with this type of issue? Also, is there anywhere we can obtain a definitive explanation of what the Mil-Spec does, or does not, require?
|

21st July 2011, 07:43 PM
|
 |
Your Elsmar Cove Host
Registration Date: Jan 1996
Location: West Chester - Southern Ohio - USA
Age: 62
|
|
Posts: 22,803
Thanks Given to Others: 7,447
Thanked 4,540 Times in 2,892 Posts
Karma Power: 400
|
|
|
Re: Assistance with a Cable Issue
I'm not a cable person, but what specific Mil-Spec is being referenced?
__________________
A Search is a terrible thing to waste!
One Test is Worth 1000 Expert Opinions - The plural of anecdote is not data - Correlation does not imply Causation
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them. - Unknown
|

22nd July 2011, 03:50 PM
|
 |
Shy Poster (1 to 5 Posts)
Registration Date: Aug 2008
Location: Melbourne Florida
|
|
Posts: 5
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 20 Karma: 10 
|
|
|
Re: Assistance with a Cable Issue
Marc,
Thanks for the response! The specification in question is MIL-C-17.
|

22nd July 2011, 04:05 PM
|
 |
Cross Forum Moderator
Registration Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southeast Wisconsin
|
|
Posts: 13,332
Thanks Given to Others: 1,779
Thanked 5,353 Times in 3,430 Posts
Karma Power: 1445
|
|
|
Re: Assistance with a Cable Issue
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by TBIRD18
Marc,
Thanks for the response! The specification in question is MIL-C-17.
|
A copy of the standard is attached. Happy reading! BTW, many, if not most, MIL standards are freely available on the web. Just Google for the standard number.
__________________
We aim to please. You aim too, please.
|
|
Thank You to Jim Wynne for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
|
|

25th July 2011, 10:25 AM
|
 |
Shy Poster (1 to 5 Posts)
Registration Date: Aug 2008
Location: Melbourne Florida
|
|
Posts: 5
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 20 Karma: 10 
|
|
|
Re: Assistance with a Cable Issue
Jim,
Thanks very much for the spec document. I took a look and I still have some concerns. The cable manufacturers are referencing the spec, but making statements regarding industry standards. Unfortunately, the statements they are making are not supported by any specifics in the spec. Is there a "final" authority with responsibility for interpreting the mil-spec?
|

25th July 2011, 10:43 AM
|
 |
Cross Forum Moderator
Registration Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southeast Wisconsin
|
|
Posts: 13,332
Thanks Given to Others: 1,779
Thanked 5,353 Times in 3,430 Posts
Karma Power: 1445
|
|
|
Re: Assistance with a Cable Issue
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by TBIRD18
Jim,
Thanks very much for the spec document. I took a look and I still have some concerns. The cable manufacturers are referencing the spec, but making statements regarding industry standards. Unfortunately, the statements they are making are not supported by any specifics in the spec. Is there a "final" authority with responsibility for interpreting the mil-spec?
|
If they're referencing the MIL spec in the contract, but what they want isn't addressed by the MIL spec, you need to get it clarified in writing, and not rely on any nebulous "industry standards." The only real standards are those that both parties agree to, and if it's not in writing, you shouldn't agree to it. If what you're producing complies with the referenced standard, you've done what was asked for. Anything beyond that needs to be specified.
__________________
We aim to please. You aim too, please.
|
|
Thank You to Jim Wynne for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
|
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Forum Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|