The Elsmar Cove Forum and Site Map The Elsmar Cove Wiki More Free Files The Elsmar Cove Forums Discussion Thread Index Post Attachments Listing Failure Modes Services and Solutions to Problems Elsmar cove Forums Main Page Elsmar Cove Home Page

Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues


The Elsmar Cove Forum SideBar!
Monitor the Forum
Monitor New Forum Posts
New Threads Feeds
RSS FeedRSS Feed
Sponsor Link










$ Contributor Forum Access
Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


Howard's International Quality Services

Atul's Symphony Technologies

Dave Scott's Scott Quality Solutions

Praxiom Research Group


NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest Portal

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology

ASQ - American Society for Quality


All the Important Standards and Related Web Sites in the World
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Content Display Modes
  #1  
Old 17th July 2002, 02:26 PM
Rosana Rosana is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Age: 39
 
Posts: 94
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 32
Karma: 20
Rosana has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Question 7.4.3 Purchasing - Evaluation of Suppliers and Establishing Inspections and Tests

Hi

I am working in a company that design and assembles brakes. I am trying to implement ISO/TS 16949:2002. I am developing the Purchasing process but I found a number of things that are not clear to me.

1) I will evaluate my suppliers and I have two kinds of evaluations pre-selection and periodic. Pre-selection is for new suppliers and periodic is for the suppliers I already have. The question is, how can I implement the procedure? Do I need to evaluate (pre-select) all the suppliers I have already or can I start with the new suppliers?

2) In 7.4.3 "the organization shall establish and implement the inspection or other activities necessary for ensuring that purchased product meets specified purchase requirements. Where the organization or its customer intends to perform verification at the supplier's premises, the organization shall state the intended verification arrangements and method of product realease in the purchasing information."
What does this mean? What I understand is that if a customer wants to verify the materials we are buying from a supplier, the customer can go to our supplier's place and make the verification. We need to have an authorization from our supplier to do this, no? The issue here is that the company's president where I work considers it confidential information about where we buy our materials. That means that if one of our customer wants to verify our supplier the company's president won't let the customer go there. Do I understand this requirement ok? If I understand ok, what can I do so I can meet the requiremt?

3) I need to inspect all incoming products. This is the way we are doing this now it: We send the purchasing order with the materials we want + the print. On the print we show the critical dimensions and the inspection points. The supplier makes the inspections according to the print and makes a report before shipping. The supplier sends the report. If we are agree with the report they send the product. Does this meet the requirements of 7.4.3?

4) The company I am working for is a family company so everyone in the family can buy at anytime and they don't use a purchase order. They go to the supplier and get the product, that's it. Is it necessary to have:
* a purchasing order ?
* someone approve the purchasing order?
how can I meet the requirement 7.4.2 Purchasing information?

Thanks
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 17th July 2002, 04:07 PM
M Greenaway's Avatar
M Greenaway M Greenaway is offline
Courtesy Access

Registration Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
 
Posts: 1,643
Thanks Given to Others: 10
Thanked 63 Times in 44 Posts
Karma Power: 80
Karma: 794
M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.
Default

Rosana some of my thoughts.

1) Dont conduct your pre-selection on your existing established suppliers - it will be a waste of time. You already have sufficient historical data to warrant having these suppliers (or otherwise).

2) This statement harks back to the good old days of the defence standards from which ISO9001 originated. It basically means that if your customer specifically requests in the contract that they wish to verify materials or other purchases you make at your suppliers premises then you have to afford them that right. It is kind of meaningless in that whatever the customer demands, and you accept in their contract you would be legally obliged to comply with - but note that this is contract specific, you do not have to do it for everyone.

3) If that method of control works for you then that is OK. The amount and type of incoming inspection done by yourselves depends on the other controls you exercise over your suppliers. We perform no goods inwards inspection.

4) The standard doesnt dictate how purchasing information is communicated. But personally I feel that a verbal agreement leaves you open to some risk.

Hope this helps.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

  #3  
Old 18th July 2002, 09:40 AM
gpainter gpainter is offline
Courtesy Access

Registration Date: Sep 2001
Location: Southern Indiana
Age: 47
 
Posts: 941
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 29 Times in 25 Posts
Karma Power: 65
Karma: 696
gpainter is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.gpainter is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.gpainter is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.gpainter is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.gpainter is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.gpainter is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.
Default

1) State in your SP that effective xx/xx/02 all new suppliers are selected based on pre-select.
2) If you or your customer wants to inspect at your supplier it must be stated on your P.O.. I understand this is common for government and military orders.
3) We have various levels of inspection. All materials get a general inspection at the dock (check of paper work, amount,visiable damage). Most of our material comes with a cert. of analysis or conformance and are not inspected further. We do have about 30 items that are inspected by us due to criticality or problems.
4) Say what you are doing and say that by turning in the receipt to accounting is approval and remember this is section 7
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 18th July 2002, 03:46 PM
Rosana Rosana is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Age: 39
 
Posts: 94
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 32
Karma: 20
Rosana has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

Thanks for your answer M Greenaway

"1) Dont conduct your pre-selection on your existing established suppliers - it will be a waste of time. You already have sufficient historical data to warrant having these suppliers (or otherwise)."

I have 3 types of suppliers A, B and C. The A suppliers have an evaluation every year, B every 2 years and C every 3 years. So when I implement the procedure all the suppliers I have I will evaluate 1 or 2 or 3 years later depending on the category. Is this ok?

"3) If that method of control works for you then that is OK. The amount and type of incoming inspection done by yourselves depends on the other controls you exercise over your suppliers. We perform no goods inwards inspection."

So is it enough if I inspect my materials only at my suppliers location, or do I need to do something else? When we receive the material we inspect the amount of boxes and the weight too, but we don't inspect the critical dimensions, because our supplier sent us the report.

Another question: when we need to buy something do we need to have an estimate from 2 or 3 supplier so we can choose the supplier?


Thanks for your answer gpainter



"1) State in your SP that effective xx/xx/02 all new suppliers are selected based on pre-select."

XX/XX/02 will be the date I implement the SP, no? Do I need to write something in my SP that all the suppliers we have are accepted?

"3) We have various levels of inspection. All materials get a general inspection at the dock (check of paper work, amount,visiable damage). Most of our material comes with a cert. of analysis or conformance and are not inspected further. We do have about 30 items that are inspected by us due to criticality or problems."

Is this certificate of analysis from a laboratory or is it from your supplier?

I can say in my SP that we will inspect certain materials and our "first article" that will go to the Design department.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 18th July 2002, 04:15 PM
gpainter gpainter is offline
Courtesy Access

Registration Date: Sep 2001
Location: Southern Indiana
Age: 47
 
Posts: 941
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 29 Times in 25 Posts
Karma Power: 65
Karma: 696
gpainter is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.gpainter is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.gpainter is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.gpainter is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.gpainter is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.gpainter is appreciated, and has over 500 Karma points.
Default

I would put down and it should be true: Based on past history,effective July 17,02 all current suppliers are on the Approved Supplier List.
Cert. of conformity - generally from a supplier- statement that the product has passed the inspection required by us
Cert. of analysis - generally from a lab on material integrity

Last edited by gpainter; 21st July 2003 at 11:06 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 18th July 2002, 07:47 PM
Rosana Rosana is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Age: 39
 
Posts: 94
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 32
Karma: 20
Rosana has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

gpainter

thank you for your information
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 18th July 2002, 10:14 PM
Rosana Rosana is offline
Involved - Posts

Registration Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Age: 39
 
Posts: 94
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 32
Karma: 20
Rosana has less than 100 Karma points so far.
Default

gpainter

I am sorry I don't understand "Cert. of conformity - generally from a customer - statement that the product has passed the inspection required by us ".
Specifically who is "a customer" and who is "us"


Thanks again
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 19th July 2002, 05:56 AM
M Greenaway's Avatar
M Greenaway M Greenaway is offline
Courtesy Access

Registration Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
 
Posts: 1,643
Thanks Given to Others: 10
Thanked 63 Times in 44 Posts
Karma Power: 80
Karma: 794
M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.M Greenaway is appreciated, and has over 700 Karma points.
Default

Over this side of the world we have a standard BS/EN10204 which describes the types fo inspection certificates that can be issued.

According to this document a type 2.1 certificate is what you might commonly call a 'certificate of conformity' in that ti contains a broad statement on product conformity that is unspecific to an order or product, and does not detail inspections undertaken or their results.

A type 3.1.b certificate is what you might call a certificate of analysis in that it states specific tests undertaken against specific products supplied on a specific order, and provides specific test results. Typically from material suppliers this type of certificate will show the chamical analysis of the actual material supplied, and any relevant mechanical properties, such as hardness, percentage elongation, etc.

I would say that a material supplier who can provide a type 3.1.b certificate should not require any actual inspection of the material supplied, just verification that the certified material properties meet the specification required.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Forum > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues

Bookmarks


Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Periodic evaluation of suppliers - ISO 17025 4.6 Purchasing services and supplies remedina ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories 3 15th July 2009 02:08 PM
ISO 9001 Clause 7.4 Purchasing, Evaluation and Re-Evaluation - Consulting Company Iman Attarzadeh ISO 9001 - Quality Management Systems Standard 15 5th April 2009 08:43 AM
Subcontracting Inspections and Tests - ISO 17020:1998 clause 14.2 amanbhai ISO 17025 - Calibration, Measurement Gages and Test Laboratories 6 29th December 2008 04:24 PM
7.4.1 Purchasing Process Criteria for re-evaluation of suppliers Road Rider ISO/TS 16949 - International Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3 18th May 2007 09:26 AM
Purchasing Procedure - Supplier selection, evaluation and re-evaluation Cari Spears Documentation Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 22 25th April 2006 08:48 PM



The time now is 08:40 AM. All times are GMT -4.
The time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.



   

All Y'All Come Back Now, Y' Hear?

Made With A Mac! FreeBSD OS Powered by Apache!
Using php4 Forums provided and maintained by Marc Smith Database by MySQL

FAIR USE and CORRECTNESS NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe herein constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/ If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. In addition, I do not guarantee the correctness of the content. The risk of using content from the Elsmar Cove web site and forums remains with the user/visitor.

Responsibility Statement: Each person is responsible for anything they post in the Elsmar Cove forum. Neither I, Marc Timothy Smith, nor any of the forum Moderators, are responsible for the content of posts people make. Liability for post content resides with the poster as does interpretation and/or acceptance and/or use of advice by the reader.

Complaints: If you have a complaint with a post in a forum discussion thread, including Content in general, fighting, flaming, copyright infringement, defamation and/or 'slander', please use the 'Report This Post Report This Post Button button which appears at the top of every post in every thread.

Site courtesy of:
Marc Timothy Smith - Cayman Business Systems, 8466 Lesourdsville-West Chester Road, West Chester, Ohio 45069-1929 - USA
(513) 341-6272

To contact me, click the Google Voice link below, enter Your Name and Your Phone Number and Google will ring your phone and connect you for free!

The Elsmar Cove Web Site is *CopyFree*
no new posts