|
Elsmar Cove Forum Sidebar
|
|
|
|
Monitor the Elsmar Forum
|
| Monitor New Forum Posts
|
|
Follow Marc & Elsmar
|
|
|
Elsmar Cove Groups
|
|
|
Sponsor Links
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donate and $ Contributor Forum Access
|
 |
|
Sponsored Links
|
|
|
|
Courtesy Quick Links
|
 Links that Elsmar Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:
Howard's International Quality Services
Atul's Symphony Technologies
Marcelo Antunes' SQR Consulting
Bob Doering's Correct SPC - Precision Machining
NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook
IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors
SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers
Quality Digest Portal
IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology
ASQ - American Society for Quality
|
|
 |
|

8th August 2011, 01:45 PM
|
|
Shy Poster (1 to 5 Posts)
Registration Date: Aug 2010
Location: USA
|
|
Posts: 1
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Karma Power: 12 Karma: 10 
|
|
Delegation of Verification Activities to a Supplier - 7.4.3 Interpretation
Hello everyone!
We recently had an "incredibly qualified" consultant perform Rev. C internal auditor training at one of our facilities. When it came to the topic of "delegation of verification activities to a supplier", this person maintained that this would include:
Any outside calibration houses
Any special processor
Any testing lab of raw materials
When I stated that I haven't seen the aerospace industry interpret the requirement that way, I was met with an icy stare and dismissed.
Doesn't this requirement only apply to purchased product (as in the title of the clause)? Is special processing a "product" or a service? Any thought on this?
I've always seen this requirement as a company is delegating the supplier's quality system as its own acceptance (inspection), where a log of approved inspectors are on file, etc. The company can issue its authority media (i.e. stamp) to the delegate for i.d. of acceptance, with a procedure in place for define supplier delegates.
|

8th August 2011, 05:07 PM
|
 |
Moderator
Registration Date: Feb 2001
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Age: 51
|
|
Posts: 694
Thanks Given to Others: 66
Thanked 165 Times in 137 Posts
Karma Power: 123
|
|
|
Re: 7.4.3 Interpretation
Unless I am misunderstanding your question, I tend to agree with your consultant at least for a special processor. The service they would provide is the product. That said, I am not sure how (or why) you would delegate inspection/acceptance responsibility to a test lab or cal house.
__________________
Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati
|

8th August 2011, 05:27 PM
|
 |
Post Responsibly
Registration Date: Oct 2001
Location: Long Beach, CA - USofA
|
|
Posts: 7,688
Thanks Given to Others: 1,588
Thanked 4,617 Times in 2,423 Posts
Karma Power: 878
|
|
|
Re: 7.4.3 Interpretation
Your consultant is mistaken. AS9100 lists several methods for incoming product acceptance and supplier delegation is ONE of them. It also allows for CoC's and test reports, what you normally get from special process houses and cal labs. Note 2 under AS9100C 7.4.3 clarifies:
Quote:
NOTE 2 Verification activities can include
- obtaining objective evidence of the conformity of the product from the supplier (e.g., accompanying documentation, certificate of conformity, test records, statistical records, process control records),
- inspection and audit at the supplier’s premises,
- review of the required documentation,
- inspection of products upon receipt, and
- delegation of verification to the supplier or supplier certification.
|
__________________
Sustainable conformity assessment must add value to all stakeholders
Last edited by Sidney Vianna; 8th August 2011 at 10:57 PM.
|
|
Thank You to Sidney Vianna for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
|
|

8th August 2011, 05:51 PM
|
|
Appreciated Member
Registration Date: Oct 2007
Location: United States, connecticut
|
|
Posts: 525
Thanks Given to Others: 130
Thanked 217 Times in 144 Posts
Karma Power: 78
|
|
|
Re: 7.4.3 Interpretation
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by rmorgan3
Hello everyone!
We recently had an "incredibly qualified" consultant perform Rev. C internal auditor training at one of our facilities. When it came to the topic of "delegation of verification activities to a supplier", this person maintained that this would include:
Any outside calibration houses
Any special processor
Any testing lab of raw materials
When I stated that I haven't seen the aerospace industry interpret the requirement that way, I was met with an icy stare and dismissed.
Doesn't this requirement only apply to purchased product (as in the title of the clause)? Is special processing a "product" or a service? Any thought on this?
I've always seen this requirement as a company is delegating the supplier's quality system as its own acceptance (inspection), where a log of approved inspectors are on file, etc. The company can issue its authority media (i.e. stamp) to the delegate for i.d. of acceptance, with a procedure in place for define supplier delegates.
|
7.4.3 Verification of Purchased Product
The organization shall establish and implement the inspection or other activities necessary for ensuring that purchased product meets specified purchase requirements.
Now..
Any outside calibration houses - (Not applicable - not product)
Any special processor - (special process - YES, if sent out from your shop -
you want to verify what it was done)
Any testing lab of raw materials - Not applicable on AS9100 C - unless
customer makes a statement on PO or your company wants to
do it because it has had bad experiences with certain suppliers)
|
|
Thank You to dsanabria for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
|
|

10th August 2011, 01:08 PM
|
 |
Appreciated Member
Registration Date: Jun 2011
Location: Canada
|
|
Posts: 511
Thanks Given to Others: 207
Thanked 290 Times in 207 Posts
Karma Power: 64
|
|
|
Re: Delegation of Verification Activities to a Supplier - 7.4.3 Interpretation
I agree with your interpretation. We use DSQR's (Designated Supplier Quality Representative) for assemblies made out of house to our specifications; they are approved by us and have stamping authority to show that they have inspected the assembly against set criteria. Note that this does NOT free us from the responsibility of ensuring that the product or service is good; follow-up is still our baby.
Cal houses? No.
|
|
Thanks to Mikishots for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
|
|

6th February 2012, 07:12 AM
|
 |
Appreciated Member
Registration Date: Apr 2002
Location: Wheeling, IL
|
|
Posts: 533
Thanks Given to Others: 20
Thanked 71 Times in 35 Posts
Karma Power: 100
|
|
|
Re: 7.4.3 Interpretation
Quote:
In Reply to Parent Post by dsanabria
7.4.3 Verification of Purchased Product
The organization shall establish and implement the inspection or other activities necessary for ensuring that purchased product meets specified purchase requirements.
Now..
Any outside calibration houses - (Not applicable - not product)
Any special processor - (special process - YES, if sent out from your shop -
you want to verify what it was done)
Any testing lab of raw materials - Not applicable on AS9100 C - unless
customer makes a statement on PO or your company wants to
do it because it has had bad experiences with certain suppliers)
|
I am still a little fuzzy on how to interpret 'WHERE THE ORGANIZATION DELEGATES VERIFICATION ACTIVITIES TO THE SUPPLIER, THE REQUIREMENT FOR DELEGATION SHALL BE DEFINED AND A REGISTER OF DELEGATIONS MAINTAINED.'
We have special processes being performed by outside sources, and we receive Certification of Compliance to the specified requirements. We have Destructive Testing and NDT performed by outside sources, and we receive Test Reports. We have calibrations performed by outside sources, and we receive calibration certificates / reports. But we have no register of delegated verification activites by these suppliers. I am not understanding when this delegation is required.
Thanks In-Advance!
Doug
|

7th February 2012, 07:58 AM
|
|
Involved in Discussions
Registration Date: Oct 2006
Location: huntsville, AL
|
|
Posts: 43
Thanks Given to Others: 38
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Karma Power: 31 Karma: 30 
|
|
|
Re: Delegation of Verification Activities to a Supplier - 7.4.3 Interpretation
My interpretation is....If your company approves a supplier to manufacture a product completely (from start to finish) and your company approves that that supplier can inspect, test and ship that product without your company doing any inspection, testing or verification activities then you have "delegated verification activities" to that supplier. Your company must have documentation within your supplier management process stating that this supplier has this authorization. We have never authorized this but we have a process to document a supplier with codes that would show up on our Qualified Supplier listing if we ever decided to do that.....I hope this isn't too far off.....
|
|
Thanks to goodnede for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
|
|

12th February 2012, 01:49 AM
|
|
Registered Visitor
Registration Date: Jan 2006
Location: New Zealand
|
|
Posts: 165
Thanks Given to Others: 13
Thanked 117 Times in 44 Posts
Karma Power: 47
|
|
|
Re: Delegation of Verification Activities to a Supplier - 7.4.3 Interpretation
Hi rmorgan3,
Your interpretation is correct, the requirement at 7.4.3 is about delegated verification activities that you may assign to a supplier, regardless of who they are or what they supply. I can't say I have seen many delegations to Special Process providers or calibration organisations.
You may decide that, following several months or years of successful delivery of a supplied product, that you provide the supplier with an approval to act on your behalf and undertake verification activities in their own premises, rather than you doing it when you receive the product. You essentially approve one or more of their inspectors under your approval system. Some of the larger aircraft manufacturer's actually issue the supplier's inspector with their stamps.
Product can then come straight into your production line without any further inspection as it already holds the release the your need, no further inspection required. You need to have a register of who holds these delegations. I normally ask how they were trained and what records show equivalence to your own training and approval process for incoming inspectors.
I'm not sure what to say about your incredibly qualified consultant, other than go with your first instincts when you suspect there is something not quite right.
Cheers,
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
Do you find this discussion thread helpful and informational?
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
Linear Mode
|
|
Forum Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|