The Cove Business Standards Discussion Forums More Free Files Forum Discussion Thread Post Attachments Listing Cove Discussion Forums Main Page
UL - Underwriters Laboratories - Health Sciences
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Nonconformance and Corrective Action
Forum Username

Elsmar Cove Forum Visitor Notice(s)

Wooden Line

The Distribution that represents the Severity of Nonconformances


Elsmar XML RSS Feed
Elsmar Cove Forum RSS Feed

Monitor the Elsmar Forum
Sponsor Links



Courtesy Quick Links

Links that Cove visitors will find useful in your quest for knowledge:


International Standards Bodies - World Wide Standards Bodies

ASQ - American Society for Quality

International Standards Organization - ISO Standards and Information

Howard's
International Quality Services

Marcelo Antunes'
SQR Consulting, and
Medical Devices Expert Forum

Bob Doering
Bob Doering's Blogs and,
Correct SPC - Precision Machining

NIST's Engineering Statistics Handbook

IRCA - International Register of Certified Auditors

SAE - Society of Automotive Engineers

Quality Digest

IEST - Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology


Related Topic Tags
defects and defectives, distribution (statistics), nonconformances, severity (general), statistical analysis and studies
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 4.00 average. Display Modes
  Post Number #1  
Old 10th August 2011, 05:09 AM
blody's Avatar
blody

 
 
Total Posts: 5
Truce The Distribution that represents the Severity of Nonconformances

Hello,

I wish to ask the opinion of you,quality gurus, before I start pushing my company to take an action to have a better knowledge about our own defects in production.

The Heinrich´s triangle is used to represent the severity and importance of small mistakes in order to prevent causalities in a facility.(which I was not allowed to attach a link for an example view) basically;
  • 1000 minor unimportant unsafe acts can cause;
  • 100 unimportant accidents;
  • 10 important accidents
  • 1 fatality.

What I wish to ask is that; if it would be irrational to assume a similar triangle for the defects in production. basically;
  • 1 customer claim
  • 10 internal claims
  • 100 scrapped parts
  • 1000 unimportant productions defects
My purpose is to show my company the risk of the loss due to poor quality in our facility.

So if I assume that the distribution of the defects and the relation of them with the customer claims do have a pattern and it can be expressed with the exponential distribution, that might allow me to calculate a cost for the management in order to take an action to have a system to follow up unimportant defects and causes.

What I am asking from you is to give me your opinions on; if this sounds
  • sane
  • logical
  • irrational
  • silly
  • stupid etc.

Thank you

Note: with assuming this can be applied, I already have calculated a cost that definitely will make them rush around like crazy

Sponsored Links
  Post Number #2  
Old 10th August 2011, 11:50 AM
Sidney Vianna's Avatar
Sidney Vianna

 
 
Total Posts: 8,304
Re: The distribution that represents the severity of the non conformances

Welcome to The Cove, blody.

What you described is pretty much in line with the loss causation model.


the actual factors in between the pyramid layers tend to vary, depending on the discipline/subject at hand, i.e., quality losses, occupational safety losses, process safety losses, etc.

But the premise remains pretty much the same. For an article expanding the concept, point your browser here.

Last edited by Sidney Vianna; 10th August 2011 at 01:30 PM.
Thank You to Sidney Vianna for your informative Post and/or Attachment!
Sponsored Links

  Post Number #3  
Old 10th August 2011, 01:28 PM
blody's Avatar
blody

 
 
Total Posts: 5
Re: The distribution that represents the severity of the non conformances

Thank you very much Sidney,

I have been searching for an article, this is perfect.
Reply

Lower Navigation Bar
Go Back   The Elsmar Cove Business Systems and Standards Discussion Forums > Common Quality Assurance Processes and Tools > Nonconformance and Corrective Action

Bookmarks



Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors (Members) and 1 Unregistered Guest Visitors)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Forum Search
Display Modes Rate Thread Content
Rate Thread Content:

Forum Posting Settings
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Discussion Threads
Discussion Thread Title Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post or Poll Vote
Risk = Likelihood * Severity - Can we mitigate the Severity? fiona_young Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 41 29th August 2013 04:32 AM
PFMEA Severity - What is Process FMEA Severity estimation based on? Matthew_Hopkins FMEA and Control Plans 75 28th August 2013 07:45 PM
Boss doesn't want Nonconformances called Nonconformances in Internal Audit Reports piningg ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 72 14th March 2012 07:56 PM
Does the PFMEA Severity have to match the DFMEA Severity? Cynik72 FMEA and Control Plans 3 18th August 2009 08:35 PM
Severity Matrix - Severity Evaluation less critical for a Sub-Components Company? Internet-101 FMEA and Control Plans 0 17th September 2002 10:00 PM



The time now is 11:20 AM. All times are GMT -4.
Your time zone can be changed in your UserCP --> Options.


 
 


NOTE: This forum uses "Cookies"