|
|
 |
|
29th July 2002, 12:52 PM
|
|
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Sep 2001
Location: Southern Indiana
Age: 47
|
|
Posts: 941
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 29 Times in 25 Posts
Karma Power: 65
|
|
ISO/IEC Guide 62 (QMS) & 66 (EMS) has been changed - 3 Year Reassessment Required
Just received a letter from our registrar. The just of it was that ISO/IEC Guide 62 (QMS) & 66 (EMS) has been changed and effective July of 2002, a reassessment will be required every 3 years. More $$$$$$$$. Who was that in a previous thread wanted to start a registration company?????
|
29th July 2002, 04:31 PM
|
|
An Original Cover!
Registration Date: Dec 1998
Location: Greenville, SC
|
|
Posts: 471
Thanks Given to Others: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Karma Power: 54 Karma: 45
|
|
I am not sure what you mean by "reassessment" but if you mean re-registration, that's pretty standard now. However, by the looks of your post, you probably mean that the registrar wants to do a complete and full-blown (including doc review) registration-type audit every 3 years. That's the first that I've heard of that, especially based on a change to ISO guide 62!
|
29th July 2002, 04:35 PM
|
|
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Sep 2001
Location: Southern Indiana
Age: 47
|
|
Posts: 941
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 29 Times in 25 Posts
Karma Power: 65
|
|
From my understanding it is a reassessment of the entire system. This applies to ISO 94, 00 and 14001.
|
29th July 2002, 04:50 PM
|
 |
Where's the shall?
Registration Date: Jul 2001
Location: Plymouth, MI
Age: 53
|
|
Posts: 2,202
Thanks Given to Others: 208
Thanked 166 Times in 128 Posts
Karma Power: 129
|
|
Reassessments
Historically, you could meet this requirement by scheduling surveillance audits so that the entire system is audited within 3 years. I’ve not heard anything from any of my registrar contacts that this has changed. I will ask them at the next opportunities.
__________________
Dave B (the other Dave)
|
29th July 2002, 05:02 PM
|
|
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Sep 2001
Location: Southern Indiana
Age: 47
|
|
Posts: 941
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 29 Times in 25 Posts
Karma Power: 65
|
|
Yes db, thats what we had been doing. I had heard in May that some changes were coming. This is a result of the ISO/IAF teaming to crack down to clean up registration process?
|
29th July 2002, 05:06 PM
|
|
Where's the shall?
Registration Date: Jul 2001
Location: Plymouth, MI
Age: 53
|
|
Posts: 2,202
Thanks Given to Others: 208
Thanked 166 Times in 128 Posts
Karma Power: 129
|
|
Don't scare me like that
I hope you are not referring to the Internal Automotive Task Force, the mere thought of the IATF getting involved in ISO stuff frightens me to no end! 
__________________
Dave B (the other Dave)
|
29th July 2002, 05:36 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator
Registration Date: Jun 1999
Location: Greenwood (Ft Smith area), Arkansas, USA
Age: 58
|
|
Posts: 6,224
Thanks Given to Others: 33
Thanked 1,248 Times in 807 Posts
Karma Power: 397
|
|
I just finished auditing a full system reassessment after the initial 3 year cycle under 14K.
|
30th July 2002, 09:32 AM
|
|
Courtesy Access
Registration Date: Sep 2001
Location: Southern Indiana
Age: 47
|
|
Posts: 941
Thanks Given to Others: 3
Thanked 29 Times in 25 Posts
Karma Power: 65
|
|
IAF is International Accreditation Forum
|
Lower Navigation Bar
|
|
|
|
Visitors Currently Viewing this Thread: 1 (0 Registered Visitors and 1 Unregistered Guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate Thread Content |
 Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Settings
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
